NASDAQ:OCSI

Oaktree Strategic Income Competitors

$8.50
0.00 (0.00 %)
(As of 03/19/2021)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$8.50
Now: $8.50
$8.50
50-Day Range
$8.25
MA: $8.47
$8.68
52-Week Range
$4.28
Now: $8.50
$8.74
VolumeN/A
Average Volume59,979 shs
Market Capitalization$250.47 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield7.29%
Beta0.98

Competitors

Oaktree Strategic Income (NASDAQ:OCSI) Vs. PFLT, TPVG, CSWC, GAIN, PNNT, and SCM

Should you be buying OCSI stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "investors, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to Oaktree Strategic Income, including PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (TPVG), Capital Southwest (CSWC), Gladstone Investment (GAIN), PennantPark Investment (PNNT), and Stellus Capital Investment (SCM).

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NASDAQ:PFLT) and Oaktree Strategic Income (NASDAQ:OCSI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, profitability and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and Oaktree Strategic Income's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$95.49 million5.21$18.41 million$1.1211.46
Oaktree Strategic Income$39.53 million6.34$-1,270,000.00$0.5515.45

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Oaktree Strategic Income. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oaktree Strategic Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and Oaktree Strategic Income, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital01202.67
Oaktree Strategic Income01002.00

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital currently has a consensus target price of $10.50, suggesting a potential downside of 18.22%. Oaktree Strategic Income has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential downside of 17.65%. Given Oaktree Strategic Income's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Oaktree Strategic Income is more favorable than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital.

Risk & Volatility

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 1.97, indicating that its stock price is 97% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Oaktree Strategic Income has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Oaktree Strategic Income pays an annual dividend of $0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 101.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Oaktree Strategic Income pays out 112.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Oaktree Strategic Income has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and Oaktree Strategic Income's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital19.28%9.04%3.59%
Oaktree Strategic Income-3.20%6.39%2.79%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

29.3% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.9% of Oaktree Strategic Income shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Oaktree Strategic Income shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital beats Oaktree Strategic Income on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Oaktree Strategic Income (NASDAQ:OCSI) and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC (NYSE:TPVG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

35.9% of Oaktree Strategic Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.9% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Oaktree Strategic Income shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Oaktree Strategic Income pays an annual dividend of $0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. Oaktree Strategic Income pays out 112.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC pays out 93.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Oaktree Strategic Income has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Oaktree Strategic Income and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Oaktree Strategic Income-3.20%6.39%2.79%
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC40.65%12.21%6.54%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Oaktree Strategic Income and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oaktree Strategic Income$39.53 million6.34$-1,270,000.00$0.5515.45
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC$73.39 million6.50$31.76 million$1.5410.03

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Oaktree Strategic Income. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oaktree Strategic Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Oaktree Strategic Income has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a beta of 1.9, suggesting that its stock price is 90% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Oaktree Strategic Income and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Oaktree Strategic Income01002.00
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC02402.67

Oaktree Strategic Income currently has a consensus price target of $7.00, suggesting a potential downside of 17.65%. TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC has a consensus price target of $10.9583, suggesting a potential downside of 29.03%. Given Oaktree Strategic Income's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Oaktree Strategic Income is more favorable than TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC.

Summary

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC beats Oaktree Strategic Income on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Oaktree Strategic Income (NASDAQ:OCSI) and Capital Southwest (NASDAQ:CSWC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Volatility and Risk

Oaktree Strategic Income has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its share price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Capital Southwest has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Oaktree Strategic Income pays an annual dividend of $0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. Capital Southwest pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.0%. Oaktree Strategic Income pays out 112.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital Southwest pays out 107.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Oaktree Strategic Income has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Capital Southwest has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Oaktree Strategic Income and Capital Southwest's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oaktree Strategic Income$39.53 million6.34$-1,270,000.00$0.5515.45
Capital Southwest$62.04 million7.67$-22,350,000.00$1.5715.25

Oaktree Strategic Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Capital Southwest. Capital Southwest is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oaktree Strategic Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Oaktree Strategic Income and Capital Southwest's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Oaktree Strategic Income-3.20%6.39%2.79%
Capital Southwest-10.38%10.17%4.73%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

35.9% of Oaktree Strategic Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.9% of Capital Southwest shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Oaktree Strategic Income shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Capital Southwest shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Oaktree Strategic Income and Capital Southwest, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Oaktree Strategic Income01002.00
Capital Southwest01402.80

Oaktree Strategic Income currently has a consensus price target of $7.00, suggesting a potential downside of 17.65%. Capital Southwest has a consensus price target of $18.60, suggesting a potential downside of 22.34%. Given Oaktree Strategic Income's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Oaktree Strategic Income is more favorable than Capital Southwest.

Summary

Capital Southwest beats Oaktree Strategic Income on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Gladstone Investment (NASDAQ:GAIN) and Oaktree Strategic Income (NASDAQ:OCSI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Gladstone Investment and Oaktree Strategic Income's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Gladstone Investment-34.86%5.53%3.52%
Oaktree Strategic Income-3.20%6.39%2.79%

Risk & Volatility

Gladstone Investment has a beta of 1.44, indicating that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Oaktree Strategic Income has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Gladstone Investment and Oaktree Strategic Income's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gladstone Investment$61.92 million7.24$-7,230,000.00$0.9015.00
Oaktree Strategic Income$39.53 million6.34$-1,270,000.00$0.5515.45

Oaktree Strategic Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gladstone Investment. Gladstone Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oaktree Strategic Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

12.1% of Gladstone Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.9% of Oaktree Strategic Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Gladstone Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Oaktree Strategic Income shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Gladstone Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Oaktree Strategic Income pays an annual dividend of $0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. Gladstone Investment pays out 93.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Oaktree Strategic Income pays out 112.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Oaktree Strategic Income has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Gladstone Investment and Oaktree Strategic Income, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Gladstone Investment0000N/A
Oaktree Strategic Income01002.00

Oaktree Strategic Income has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential downside of 17.65%. Given Oaktree Strategic Income's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Oaktree Strategic Income is more favorable than Gladstone Investment.

Summary

Gladstone Investment beats Oaktree Strategic Income on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Oaktree Strategic Income (NASDAQ:OCSI) and PennantPark Investment (NASDAQ:PNNT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and risk.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

35.9% of Oaktree Strategic Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.9% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Oaktree Strategic Income shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Oaktree Strategic Income and PennantPark Investment, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Oaktree Strategic Income01002.00
PennantPark Investment01302.75

Oaktree Strategic Income presently has a consensus target price of $7.00, indicating a potential downside of 17.65%. PennantPark Investment has a consensus target price of $5.00, indicating a potential downside of 22.24%. Given Oaktree Strategic Income's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Oaktree Strategic Income is more favorable than PennantPark Investment.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Oaktree Strategic Income and PennantPark Investment's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oaktree Strategic Income$39.53 million6.34$-1,270,000.00$0.5515.45
PennantPark Investment$100.22 million4.30$-15,970,000.00$0.6110.54

Oaktree Strategic Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PennantPark Investment. PennantPark Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oaktree Strategic Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Oaktree Strategic Income and PennantPark Investment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Oaktree Strategic Income-3.20%6.39%2.79%
PennantPark Investment-15.93%7.56%3.07%

Dividends

Oaktree Strategic Income pays an annual dividend of $0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. PennantPark Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. Oaktree Strategic Income pays out 112.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Investment pays out 78.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Oaktree Strategic Income has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and PennantPark Investment has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. PennantPark Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Volatility and Risk

Oaktree Strategic Income has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PennantPark Investment has a beta of 1.98, suggesting that its stock price is 98% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

PennantPark Investment beats Oaktree Strategic Income on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Stellus Capital Investment (NYSE:SCM) and Oaktree Strategic Income (NASDAQ:OCSI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Stellus Capital Investment and Oaktree Strategic Income's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Stellus Capital Investment$58.91 million4.51$26.44 million$1.2311.07
Oaktree Strategic Income$39.53 million6.34$-1,270,000.00$0.5515.45

Stellus Capital Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Oaktree Strategic Income. Stellus Capital Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oaktree Strategic Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Stellus Capital Investment and Oaktree Strategic Income, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Stellus Capital Investment01202.67
Oaktree Strategic Income01002.00

Stellus Capital Investment presently has a consensus target price of $11.00, suggesting a potential downside of 19.24%. Oaktree Strategic Income has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential downside of 17.65%. Given Oaktree Strategic Income's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Oaktree Strategic Income is more favorable than Stellus Capital Investment.

Dividends

Stellus Capital Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. Oaktree Strategic Income pays an annual dividend of $0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. Stellus Capital Investment pays out 81.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Oaktree Strategic Income pays out 112.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Stellus Capital Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Oaktree Strategic Income has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Stellus Capital Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Volatility & Risk

Stellus Capital Investment has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Oaktree Strategic Income has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its share price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

15.6% of Stellus Capital Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.9% of Oaktree Strategic Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.4% of Stellus Capital Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Oaktree Strategic Income shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Stellus Capital Investment and Oaktree Strategic Income's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Stellus Capital Investment8.91%9.70%3.74%
Oaktree Strategic Income-3.20%6.39%2.79%

Summary

Stellus Capital Investment beats Oaktree Strategic Income on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.


Oaktree Strategic Income Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital logo
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1.0$12.84flat$497.81 million$95.49 million27.32Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC logo
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC
1.4$15.44flat$476.82 million$73.39 million12.66Decrease in Short Interest
Capital Southwest logo
CSWC
Capital Southwest
1.4$23.95flat$475.84 million$62.04 million-59.88Analyst Upgrade
Gladstone Investment logo
GAIN
Gladstone Investment
1.2$13.50flat$448.27 million$61.92 million-25.00
PennantPark Investment logo
PNNT
PennantPark Investment
1.3$6.43flat$431.10 million$100.22 million-26.79
Stellus Capital Investment logo
SCM
Stellus Capital Investment
1.2$13.62flat$265.40 million$58.91 million54.48
PTMN
Portman Ridge Finance
1.2$2.42flat$181.97 million$26.50 million-8.34
Safeguard Scientifics logo
SFE
Safeguard Scientifics
0.9$6.48flat$135.72 millionN/A-4.35News Coverage
First Eagle Alternative Capital BDC logo
FCRD
First Eagle Alternative Capital BDC
1.2$4.19flat$126.16 million$52.49 million-2.30
OFS Capital logo
OFS
OFS Capital
1.1$9.08flat$121.75 million$52.52 million-16.81News Coverage
Investcorp Credit Management BDC logo
ICMB
Investcorp Credit Management BDC
1.2$5.68flat$79.04 million$34.46 million-3.76Decrease in Short Interest
TURN
180 Degree Capital
0.8$7.28flat$75.52 millionN/A0.00
Rand Capital logo
RAND
Rand Capital
1.3$18.50flat$47.77 million$2.72 million10.63Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Live Ventures logo
LIVE
Live Ventures
0.9$29.75flat$46.26 million$191.70 million-25.21
Firsthand Technology Value Fund logo
SVVC
Firsthand Technology Value Fund
0.8$6.25flat$43.08 million$1.79 million-0.81High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Down
Capitala Finance logo
CPTA
Capitala Finance
1.1$15.86flat$43.00 million$44.03 million-1.19Decrease in Short Interest
LYL
Dragon Victory International
0.4$1.60flat$18.62 million$10,000.000.00High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Down
This page was last updated on 4/14/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.