S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
Log in
NASDAQ:SOLO

Electrameccanica Vehicles Competitors

$5.05
-0.32 (-5.96 %)
(As of 03/5/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$4.34
Now: $5.05
$5.33
50-Day Range
$5.37
MA: $7.59
$9.48
52-Week Range
$0.89
Now: $5.05
$13.60
Volume13.40 million shs
Average Volume17.06 million shs
Market Capitalization$412.67 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta3.08

Competitors

Electrameccanica Vehicles (NASDAQ:SOLO) Vs. TSLA, TM, GM, HMC, NIO, and F

Should you be buying SOLO stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "motor vehicles & car bodies" are considered alternatives and competitors to Electrameccanica Vehicles, including Tesla (TSLA), Toyota Motor (TM), General Motors (GM), Honda Motor (HMC), NIO (NIO), and Ford Motor (F).

Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) and Electrameccanica Vehicles (NASDAQ:SOLO) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Tesla and Electrameccanica Vehicles' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tesla$24.58 billion23.35$-862,000,000.00($0.98)-610.15
Electrameccanica Vehicles$580,000.00711.49$-23,170,000.00($0.64)-7.89

Electrameccanica Vehicles has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tesla. Tesla is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Electrameccanica Vehicles, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

41.4% of Tesla shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.3% of Electrameccanica Vehicles shares are held by institutional investors. 23.0% of Tesla shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Tesla and Electrameccanica Vehicles' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Tesla1.97%4.93%1.43%
Electrameccanica Vehicles-4,809.43%-61.89%-50.36%

Risk and Volatility

Tesla has a beta of 2.18, suggesting that its share price is 118% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Electrameccanica Vehicles has a beta of 3.08, suggesting that its share price is 208% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Tesla and Electrameccanica Vehicles, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Tesla1214601.81
Electrameccanica Vehicles01402.80

Tesla currently has a consensus price target of $324.9241, suggesting a potential downside of 45.66%. Electrameccanica Vehicles has a consensus price target of $8.4167, suggesting a potential upside of 66.67%. Given Electrameccanica Vehicles' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Electrameccanica Vehicles is more favorable than Tesla.

Summary

Tesla beats Electrameccanica Vehicles on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Toyota Motor (NYSE:TM) and Electrameccanica Vehicles (NASDAQ:SOLO) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Toyota Motor and Electrameccanica Vehicles' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Toyota Motor$275.36 billion0.75$19.10 billion$13.4211.07
Electrameccanica Vehicles$580,000.00711.49$-23,170,000.00($0.64)-7.89

Toyota Motor has higher revenue and earnings than Electrameccanica Vehicles. Electrameccanica Vehicles is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Toyota Motor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Toyota Motor and Electrameccanica Vehicles, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Toyota Motor10202.33
Electrameccanica Vehicles01402.80

Electrameccanica Vehicles has a consensus price target of $8.4167, suggesting a potential upside of 66.67%. Given Electrameccanica Vehicles' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Electrameccanica Vehicles is more favorable than Toyota Motor.

Profitability

This table compares Toyota Motor and Electrameccanica Vehicles' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Toyota Motor5.51%6.73%2.62%
Electrameccanica Vehicles-4,809.43%-61.89%-50.36%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

1.1% of Toyota Motor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.3% of Electrameccanica Vehicles shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Toyota Motor has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Electrameccanica Vehicles has a beta of 3.08, suggesting that its share price is 208% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Toyota Motor beats Electrameccanica Vehicles on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Electrameccanica Vehicles (NASDAQ:SOLO) and General Motors (NYSE:GM) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Electrameccanica Vehicles and General Motors' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Electrameccanica Vehicles$580,000.00711.49$-23,170,000.00($0.64)-7.89
General Motors$137.24 billion0.56$6.73 billion$4.8211.15

General Motors has higher revenue and earnings than Electrameccanica Vehicles. Electrameccanica Vehicles is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than General Motors, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Electrameccanica Vehicles and General Motors, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Electrameccanica Vehicles01402.80
General Motors211502.72

Electrameccanica Vehicles currently has a consensus price target of $8.4167, suggesting a potential upside of 66.67%. General Motors has a consensus price target of $55.3889, suggesting a potential upside of 3.05%. Given Electrameccanica Vehicles' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Electrameccanica Vehicles is more favorable than General Motors.

Profitability

This table compares Electrameccanica Vehicles and General Motors' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Electrameccanica Vehicles-4,809.43%-61.89%-50.36%
General Motors2.92%9.78%1.87%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

5.3% of Electrameccanica Vehicles shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.7% of General Motors shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of General Motors shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Electrameccanica Vehicles has a beta of 3.08, indicating that its stock price is 208% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, General Motors has a beta of 1.42, indicating that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

General Motors beats Electrameccanica Vehicles on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Electrameccanica Vehicles (NASDAQ:SOLO) and Honda Motor (NYSE:HMC) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Electrameccanica Vehicles and Honda Motor's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Electrameccanica Vehicles$580,000.00711.49$-23,170,000.00($0.64)-7.89
Honda Motor$137.10 billion0.37$4.19 billion$2.3912.30

Honda Motor has higher revenue and earnings than Electrameccanica Vehicles. Electrameccanica Vehicles is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Honda Motor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Electrameccanica Vehicles and Honda Motor, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Electrameccanica Vehicles01402.80
Honda Motor10602.71

Electrameccanica Vehicles currently has a consensus price target of $8.4167, suggesting a potential upside of 66.67%. Given Electrameccanica Vehicles' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Electrameccanica Vehicles is more favorable than Honda Motor.

Profitability

This table compares Electrameccanica Vehicles and Honda Motor's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Electrameccanica Vehicles-4,809.43%-61.89%-50.36%
Honda Motor1.93%2.99%1.23%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

5.3% of Electrameccanica Vehicles shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.4% of Honda Motor shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Electrameccanica Vehicles has a beta of 3.08, indicating that its stock price is 208% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Honda Motor has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Honda Motor beats Electrameccanica Vehicles on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Electrameccanica Vehicles (NASDAQ:SOLO) and NIO (NYSE:NIO) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Electrameccanica Vehicles and NIO's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Electrameccanica Vehicles$580,000.00711.49$-23,170,000.00($0.64)-7.89
NIO$1.12 billion43.47$-1,621,200,000.00($1.59)-23.97

Electrameccanica Vehicles has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NIO. NIO is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Electrameccanica Vehicles, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Electrameccanica Vehicles and NIO, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Electrameccanica Vehicles01402.80
NIO07902.56

Electrameccanica Vehicles currently has a consensus price target of $8.4167, suggesting a potential upside of 66.67%. NIO has a consensus price target of $50.6375, suggesting a potential upside of 32.87%. Given Electrameccanica Vehicles' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Electrameccanica Vehicles is more favorable than NIO.

Profitability

This table compares Electrameccanica Vehicles and NIO's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Electrameccanica Vehicles-4,809.43%-61.89%-50.36%
NIO-55.72%N/A-31.48%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

5.3% of Electrameccanica Vehicles shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of NIO shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Electrameccanica Vehicles has a beta of 3.08, indicating that its stock price is 208% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NIO has a beta of 2.81, indicating that its stock price is 181% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Electrameccanica Vehicles beats NIO on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Electrameccanica Vehicles (NASDAQ:SOLO) and Ford Motor (NYSE:F) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Electrameccanica Vehicles and Ford Motor's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Electrameccanica Vehicles$580,000.00711.49$-23,170,000.00($0.64)-7.89
Ford Motor$155.90 billion0.31$47 million$1.1910.31

Ford Motor has higher revenue and earnings than Electrameccanica Vehicles. Electrameccanica Vehicles is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ford Motor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Electrameccanica Vehicles and Ford Motor, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Electrameccanica Vehicles01402.80
Ford Motor27502.21

Electrameccanica Vehicles currently has a consensus price target of $8.4167, suggesting a potential upside of 66.67%. Ford Motor has a consensus price target of $9.9643, suggesting a potential downside of 18.79%. Given Electrameccanica Vehicles' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Electrameccanica Vehicles is more favorable than Ford Motor.

Profitability

This table compares Electrameccanica Vehicles and Ford Motor's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Electrameccanica Vehicles-4,809.43%-61.89%-50.36%
Ford Motor-0.12%2.48%0.30%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

5.3% of Electrameccanica Vehicles shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.8% of Ford Motor shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Ford Motor shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Electrameccanica Vehicles has a beta of 3.08, indicating that its stock price is 208% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ford Motor has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Ford Motor beats Electrameccanica Vehicles on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Electrameccanica Vehicles Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Tesla logo
TSLA
Tesla
1.4$597.95-3.9%$573.94 billion$24.58 billion1,200.70Insider Selling
Gap Down
Toyota Motor logo
TM
Toyota Motor
1.6$148.52-1.1%$207.63 billion$275.36 billion15.72Increase in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
General Motors logo
GM
General Motors
2.3$53.75-3.6%$77.45 billion$137.24 billion24.10Gap Up
Honda Motor logo
HMC
Honda Motor
1.9$29.39-2.7%$50.75 billion$137.10 billion22.27Analyst Revision
News Coverage
NIO logo
NIO
NIO
1.6$38.11-3.1%$48.86 billion$1.12 billion-40.98Earnings Announcement
Gap Down
Ford Motor logo
F
Ford Motor
1.3$12.27-2.8%$48.82 billion$155.90 billion-306.75
Ferrari logo
RACE
Ferrari
1.7$188.90-0.6%$34.90 billion$4.22 billion60.74Analyst Report
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles logo
FCAU
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles
1.1$16.73-2.6%$32.78 billion$121.18 billion209.15
PACCAR logo
PCAR
PACCAR
1.9$94.15-1.9%$32.66 billion$25.60 billion22.96
XPEV
XPeng
1.8$28.03-4.7%$21.94 billionN/A0.00Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
Li Auto logo
LI
Li Auto
1.6$22.46-0.6%$20.16 billion$41.88 million0.00Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
Tata Motors logo
TTM
Tata Motors
0.6$22.32-0.8%$13.79 billion$36.46 billion-7.06
Oshkosh logo
OSK
Oshkosh
2.6$113.65-6.2%$7.77 billion$6.86 billion24.08Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
Navistar International logo
NAV
Navistar International
1.3$44.18-0.2%$4.40 billion$7.50 billion-12.73Upcoming Earnings
Nikola logo
NKLA
Nikola
1.2$10.40-4.3%$4.08 billionN/A0.00Insider Selling
News Coverage
Lordstown Motors logo
RIDE
Lordstown Motors
1.1$16.77-6.1%$2.77 billionN/A0.00Gap Down
Niu Technologies logo
NIU
Niu Technologies
1.2$33.55-0.0%$2.51 billion$298.24 million108.23Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
Federal Signal logo
FSS
Federal Signal
1.8$37.10-0.9%$2.25 billion$1.22 billion22.90Insider Selling
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Workhorse Group logo
WKHS
Workhorse Group
1.3$13.73-5.3%$1.65 billion$380,000.00-7.42Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
Gap Down
The Shyft Group logo
SHYF
The Shyft Group
1.8$33.24-2.9%$1.18 billion$756.54 million-415.50Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
REV Group logo
REVG
REV Group
1.6$13.39-4.8%$854.48 million$2.28 billion-27.33Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Kandi Technologies Group logo
KNDI
Kandi Technologies Group
0.5$6.10-2.1%$387.52 million$135.74 million-50.83Gap Down
This page was last updated on 3/7/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.