NASDAQ:SOLO

Electrameccanica Vehicles Competitors

Followed 104 Times Searched 588 Times

$5.05

-0.32 (-5.96 %)

(As of 03/5/2021 12:00 AM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$4.34

Now: $5.05▼

$5.33

50-Day Range

$5.37

MA: $7.59▼

$9.48

52-Week Range

$0.89

Now: $5.05▼

$13.60

Volume13.40 million shs

Average Volume17.06 million shs

Market Capitalization$412.67 million

P/E RatioN/A

Dividend YieldN/A

Beta3.08

Electrameccanica Vehicles (NASDAQ:SOLO) Vs. TSLA, TM, GM, HMC, NIO, and F

Should you be buying SOLO stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "motor vehicles & car bodies" are considered alternatives and competitors to Electrameccanica Vehicles, including Tesla (TSLA), Toyota Motor (TM), General Motors (GM), Honda Motor (HMC), NIO (NIO), and Ford Motor (F).

Electrameccanica Vehicles vs. Tesla Stock

Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) and Electrameccanica Vehicles (NASDAQ:SOLO) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Tesla and Electrameccanica Vehicles' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Tesla	$24.58 billion	23.35	$-862,000,000.00	($0.98)	-610.15
Electrameccanica Vehicles	$580,000.00	711.49	$-23,170,000.00	($0.64)	-7.89

Electrameccanica Vehicles has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tesla. Tesla is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Electrameccanica Vehicles, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

41.4% of Tesla shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.3% of Electrameccanica Vehicles shares are held by institutional investors. 23.0% of Tesla shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Tesla and Electrameccanica Vehicles' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Tesla	1.97%	4.93%	1.43%
Electrameccanica Vehicles	-4,809.43%	-61.89%	-50.36%

Risk and Volatility

Tesla has a beta of 2.18, suggesting that its share price is 118% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Electrameccanica Vehicles has a beta of 3.08, suggesting that its share price is 208% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Tesla and Electrameccanica Vehicles, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Tesla	12	14	6	0	1.81
Electrameccanica Vehicles	0	1	4	0	2.80

Tesla currently has a consensus price target of $324.9241, suggesting a potential downside of 45.66%. Electrameccanica Vehicles has a consensus price target of $8.4167, suggesting a potential upside of 66.67%. Given Electrameccanica Vehicles' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Electrameccanica Vehicles is more favorable than Tesla.

Summary

Tesla beats Electrameccanica Vehicles on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Electrameccanica Vehicles vs. Toyota Motor Stock

Toyota Motor (NYSE:TM) and Electrameccanica Vehicles (NASDAQ:SOLO) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Toyota Motor and Electrameccanica Vehicles' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Toyota Motor	$275.36 billion	0.75	$19.10 billion	$13.42	11.07
Electrameccanica Vehicles	$580,000.00	711.49	$-23,170,000.00	($0.64)	-7.89

Toyota Motor has higher revenue and earnings than Electrameccanica Vehicles. Electrameccanica Vehicles is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Toyota Motor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Toyota Motor and Electrameccanica Vehicles, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Toyota Motor	1	0	2	0	2.33
Electrameccanica Vehicles	0	1	4	0	2.80

Electrameccanica Vehicles has a consensus price target of $8.4167, suggesting a potential upside of 66.67%. Given Electrameccanica Vehicles' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Electrameccanica Vehicles is more favorable than Toyota Motor.

Profitability

This table compares Toyota Motor and Electrameccanica Vehicles' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Toyota Motor	5.51%	6.73%	2.62%
Electrameccanica Vehicles	-4,809.43%	-61.89%	-50.36%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

1.1% of Toyota Motor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.3% of Electrameccanica Vehicles shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Toyota Motor has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Electrameccanica Vehicles has a beta of 3.08, suggesting that its share price is 208% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Toyota Motor beats Electrameccanica Vehicles on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Electrameccanica Vehicles vs. General Motors Stock

Electrameccanica Vehicles (NASDAQ:SOLO) and General Motors (NYSE:GM) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Electrameccanica Vehicles and General Motors' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Electrameccanica Vehicles	$580,000.00	711.49	$-23,170,000.00	($0.64)	-7.89
General Motors	$137.24 billion	0.56	$6.73 billion	$4.82	11.15

General Motors has higher revenue and earnings than Electrameccanica Vehicles. Electrameccanica Vehicles is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than General Motors, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Electrameccanica Vehicles and General Motors, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Electrameccanica Vehicles	0	1	4	0	2.80
General Motors	2	1	15	0	2.72

Electrameccanica Vehicles currently has a consensus price target of $8.4167, suggesting a potential upside of 66.67%. General Motors has a consensus price target of $55.3889, suggesting a potential upside of 3.05%. Given Electrameccanica Vehicles' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Electrameccanica Vehicles is more favorable than General Motors.

Profitability

This table compares Electrameccanica Vehicles and General Motors' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Electrameccanica Vehicles	-4,809.43%	-61.89%	-50.36%
General Motors	2.92%	9.78%	1.87%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

5.3% of Electrameccanica Vehicles shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.7% of General Motors shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of General Motors shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Electrameccanica Vehicles has a beta of 3.08, indicating that its stock price is 208% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, General Motors has a beta of 1.42, indicating that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

General Motors beats Electrameccanica Vehicles on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Electrameccanica Vehicles vs. Honda Motor Stock

Electrameccanica Vehicles (NASDAQ:SOLO) and Honda Motor (NYSE:HMC) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Electrameccanica Vehicles and Honda Motor's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Electrameccanica Vehicles	$580,000.00	711.49	$-23,170,000.00	($0.64)	-7.89
Honda Motor	$137.10 billion	0.37	$4.19 billion	$2.39	12.30

Honda Motor has higher revenue and earnings than Electrameccanica Vehicles. Electrameccanica Vehicles is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Honda Motor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Electrameccanica Vehicles and Honda Motor, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Electrameccanica Vehicles	0	1	4	0	2.80
Honda Motor	1	0	6	0	2.71

Electrameccanica Vehicles currently has a consensus price target of $8.4167, suggesting a potential upside of 66.67%. Given Electrameccanica Vehicles' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Electrameccanica Vehicles is more favorable than Honda Motor.

Profitability

This table compares Electrameccanica Vehicles and Honda Motor's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Electrameccanica Vehicles	-4,809.43%	-61.89%	-50.36%
Honda Motor	1.93%	2.99%	1.23%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

5.3% of Electrameccanica Vehicles shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.4% of Honda Motor shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Electrameccanica Vehicles has a beta of 3.08, indicating that its stock price is 208% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Honda Motor has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Honda Motor beats Electrameccanica Vehicles on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Electrameccanica Vehicles vs. NIO Stock

Electrameccanica Vehicles (NASDAQ:SOLO) and NIO (NYSE:NIO) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Electrameccanica Vehicles and NIO's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Electrameccanica Vehicles	$580,000.00	711.49	$-23,170,000.00	($0.64)	-7.89
NIO	$1.12 billion	43.47	$-1,621,200,000.00	($1.59)	-23.97

Electrameccanica Vehicles has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NIO. NIO is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Electrameccanica Vehicles, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Electrameccanica Vehicles and NIO, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Electrameccanica Vehicles	0	1	4	0	2.80
NIO	0	7	9	0	2.56

Electrameccanica Vehicles currently has a consensus price target of $8.4167, suggesting a potential upside of 66.67%. NIO has a consensus price target of $50.6375, suggesting a potential upside of 32.87%. Given Electrameccanica Vehicles' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Electrameccanica Vehicles is more favorable than NIO.

Profitability

This table compares Electrameccanica Vehicles and NIO's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Electrameccanica Vehicles	-4,809.43%	-61.89%	-50.36%
NIO	-55.72%	N/A	-31.48%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

5.3% of Electrameccanica Vehicles shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of NIO shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Electrameccanica Vehicles has a beta of 3.08, indicating that its stock price is 208% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NIO has a beta of 2.81, indicating that its stock price is 181% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Electrameccanica Vehicles beats NIO on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Electrameccanica Vehicles vs. Ford Motor Stock

Electrameccanica Vehicles (NASDAQ:SOLO) and Ford Motor (NYSE:F) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Electrameccanica Vehicles and Ford Motor's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Electrameccanica Vehicles	$580,000.00	711.49	$-23,170,000.00	($0.64)	-7.89
Ford Motor	$155.90 billion	0.31	$47 million	$1.19	10.31

Ford Motor has higher revenue and earnings than Electrameccanica Vehicles. Electrameccanica Vehicles is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ford Motor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Electrameccanica Vehicles and Ford Motor, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Electrameccanica Vehicles	0	1	4	0	2.80
Ford Motor	2	7	5	0	2.21

Electrameccanica Vehicles currently has a consensus price target of $8.4167, suggesting a potential upside of 66.67%. Ford Motor has a consensus price target of $9.9643, suggesting a potential downside of 18.79%. Given Electrameccanica Vehicles' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Electrameccanica Vehicles is more favorable than Ford Motor.

Profitability

This table compares Electrameccanica Vehicles and Ford Motor's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Electrameccanica Vehicles	-4,809.43%	-61.89%	-50.36%
Ford Motor	-0.12%	2.48%	0.30%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

5.3% of Electrameccanica Vehicles shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.8% of Ford Motor shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Ford Motor shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Electrameccanica Vehicles has a beta of 3.08, indicating that its stock price is 208% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ford Motor has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Ford Motor beats Electrameccanica Vehicles on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.