NASDAQ:TMKR

Tastemaker Acquisition Competitors

$9.74
+0.01 (+0.10 %)
(As of 06/11/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$9.74
$9.78
50-Day Range
$9.68
$9.85
52-Week Range
$9.51
$10.50
Volume55,700 shs
Average Volume81,839 shs
Market Capitalization$292.20 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
BetaN/A

Tastemaker Acquisition (NASDAQ:TMKR) Vs. CPUH, TBA, CRHC, BCSF, BROG, and APSG

Should you be buying TMKR stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "holding & other investment offices" are considered alternatives and competitors to Tastemaker Acquisition, including Compute Health Acquisition (CPUH), Thoma Bravo Advantage (TBA), Cohn Robbins (CRHC), Bain Capital Specialty Finance (BCSF), Brooge Energy (BROG), and Apollo Strategic Growth Capital (APSG).

Tastemaker Acquisition (NASDAQ:TMKR) and Compute Health Acquisition (NYSE:CPUH) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

52.2% of Tastemaker Acquisition shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.5% of Compute Health Acquisition shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Tastemaker Acquisition and Compute Health Acquisition's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Tastemaker AcquisitionN/AN/AN/A
Compute Health AcquisitionN/AN/AN/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Tastemaker Acquisition and Compute Health Acquisition's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tastemaker AcquisitionN/AN/A$-110,000.00N/AN/A
Compute Health AcquisitionN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Tastemaker Acquisition and Compute Health Acquisition, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Tastemaker Acquisition0000N/A
Compute Health Acquisition0000N/A

Summary

Compute Health Acquisition beats Tastemaker Acquisition on 1 of the 1 factors compared between the two stocks.

Tastemaker Acquisition (NASDAQ:TMKR) and Thoma Bravo Advantage (NYSE:TBA) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

52.2% of Tastemaker Acquisition shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.2% of Thoma Bravo Advantage shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Tastemaker Acquisition and Thoma Bravo Advantage's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Tastemaker AcquisitionN/AN/AN/A
Thoma Bravo AdvantageN/AN/AN/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Tastemaker Acquisition and Thoma Bravo Advantage's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tastemaker AcquisitionN/AN/A$-110,000.00N/AN/A
Thoma Bravo AdvantageN/AN/A$-30,000.00N/AN/A

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Tastemaker Acquisition and Thoma Bravo Advantage, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Tastemaker Acquisition0000N/A
Thoma Bravo Advantage0000N/A

Summary

Thoma Bravo Advantage beats Tastemaker Acquisition on 2 of the 2 factors compared between the two stocks.

Tastemaker Acquisition (NASDAQ:TMKR) and Cohn Robbins (NYSE:CRHC) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

52.2% of Tastemaker Acquisition shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.1% of Cohn Robbins shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Tastemaker Acquisition and Cohn Robbins' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Tastemaker AcquisitionN/AN/AN/A
Cohn RobbinsN/AN/AN/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Tastemaker Acquisition and Cohn Robbins' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tastemaker AcquisitionN/AN/A$-110,000.00N/AN/A
Cohn RobbinsN/AN/A$-250,000.00N/AN/A

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Tastemaker Acquisition and Cohn Robbins, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Tastemaker Acquisition0000N/A
Cohn Robbins0000N/A

Tastemaker Acquisition (NASDAQ:TMKR) and Bain Capital Specialty Finance (NYSE:BCSF) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

52.2% of Tastemaker Acquisition shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.9% of Bain Capital Specialty Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Bain Capital Specialty Finance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Tastemaker Acquisition and Bain Capital Specialty Finance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Tastemaker AcquisitionN/AN/AN/A
Bain Capital Specialty Finance74.93%8.11%3.31%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Tastemaker Acquisition and Bain Capital Specialty Finance's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tastemaker AcquisitionN/AN/A$-110,000.00N/AN/A
Bain Capital Specialty Finance$194.46 million5.30$8.28 million$1.4610.94

Bain Capital Specialty Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Tastemaker Acquisition.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Tastemaker Acquisition and Bain Capital Specialty Finance, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Tastemaker Acquisition0000N/A
Bain Capital Specialty Finance03002.00

Bain Capital Specialty Finance has a consensus price target of $12.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 20.68%. Given Bain Capital Specialty Finance's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Bain Capital Specialty Finance is more favorable than Tastemaker Acquisition.

Summary

Bain Capital Specialty Finance beats Tastemaker Acquisition on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Tastemaker Acquisition (NASDAQ:TMKR) and Brooge Energy (NASDAQ:BROG) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Tastemaker Acquisition and Brooge Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Tastemaker Acquisition0000N/A
Brooge Energy00103.00

Given Brooge Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Brooge Energy is more favorable than Tastemaker Acquisition.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Tastemaker Acquisition and Brooge Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tastemaker AcquisitionN/AN/A$-110,000.00N/AN/A
Brooge Energy$44.08 million22.87$-76,560,000.00N/AN/A

Tastemaker Acquisition has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brooge Energy.

Profitability

This table compares Tastemaker Acquisition and Brooge Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Tastemaker AcquisitionN/AN/AN/A
Brooge EnergyN/AN/AN/A

Institutional and Insider Ownership

52.2% of Tastemaker Acquisition shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.0% of Brooge Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Brooge Energy beats Tastemaker Acquisition on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Apollo Strategic Growth Capital (NYSE:APSG) and Tastemaker Acquisition (NASDAQ:TMKR) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Apollo Strategic Growth Capital and Tastemaker Acquisition, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Apollo Strategic Growth Capital0000N/A
Tastemaker Acquisition0000N/A

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Apollo Strategic Growth Capital and Tastemaker Acquisition's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Apollo Strategic Growth CapitalN/AN/A$-410,000.00N/AN/A
Tastemaker AcquisitionN/AN/A$-110,000.00N/AN/A

Profitability

This table compares Apollo Strategic Growth Capital and Tastemaker Acquisition's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Apollo Strategic Growth CapitalN/AN/AN/A
Tastemaker AcquisitionN/AN/AN/A

Insider & Institutional Ownership

60.2% of Apollo Strategic Growth Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.2% of Tastemaker Acquisition shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.


Tastemaker Acquisition Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
CPUH
Compute Health Acquisition
0.2$9.84+0.4%$1.06 billionN/A0.00
TBA
Thoma Bravo Advantage
0.3$10.24+0.4%$1.05 billionN/A0.00
CRHC
Cohn Robbins
0.2$9.90+0.2%$1.03 billionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
Bain Capital Specialty Finance logo
BCSF
Bain Capital Specialty Finance
1.6$15.97+0.5%$1.03 billion$194.46 million6.94Decrease in Short Interest
Brooge Energy logo
BROG
Brooge Energy
0.8$9.20+0.0%$1.01 billion$44.08 million0.00Gap Up
APSG
Apollo Strategic Growth Capital
0.2$9.77+0.0%$997.53 millionN/A0.00
GSAH
GS Acquisition Holdings Corp II
0.6$10.27+0.8%$970.31 million$70,000.000.00Decrease in Short Interest
CONX
CONX
0.2$9.87+0.2%$927.39 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
PNTM
Pontem
0.2$9.75+0.1%$839.99 millionN/A0.00
The Lion Electric logo
LEV
The Lion Electric
1.5$19.76+4.7%$825.79 millionN/A0.00
PRPB
CC Neuberger Principal Holdings II
0.3$9.89+0.2%$817.24 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
FVIV
Fortress Value Acquisition Corp. IV
0.0$9.97+0.2%$810.06 millionN/A0.00High Trading Volume
AVAN
Avanti Acquisition
0.2$9.80+0.6%$730.50 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
AGC
Altimeter Growth
0.0$11.74+0.7%$725.84 millionN/A0.00
MSDA
MSD Acquisition
0.0$9.91+0.8%$718.03 millionN/A0.00High Trading Volume
VYGG
Vy Global Growth
0.2$9.99+0.1%$717.31 millionN/A0.00
RBAC
RedBall Acquisition
0.2$9.82+0.0%$705.81 millionN/A0.00
Global Cord Blood logo
CO
Global Cord Blood
0.8$5.64+2.3%$701.35 million$172.50 million9.89Increase in Short Interest
CCVI
Churchill Capital Corp VI
0.0$10.04+0.6%$688.62 millionN/A0.00
Horizon Acquisition logo
HZAC
Horizon Acquisition
0.2$10.01+0.7%$685.42 millionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
FPAC
Far Peak Acquisition
0.2$9.78+0.2%$683.55 millionN/A0.00
WPCB
Warburg Pincus Capital Co. I-B
0.0$9.85+0.2%$674.28 millionN/A0.00
GRSV
Gores Holdings V
0.3$10.38+1.2%$673.31 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
TREB
Trebia Acquisition
0.3$9.87+0.6%$642.35 millionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
ARVL
Arrival
1.4$19.20+2.9%$638.77 millionN/A0.00
CCV
Churchill Capital Corp V
0.2$10.26+1.9%$629.38 millionN/A0.00High Trading Volume
Unusual Options Activity
LCA
Landcadia Holdings IV
0.0$9.73+2.0%$620 millionN/A0.00
JBI
Janus International Group
0.3$14.29+0.3%$616.33 millionN/A0.00
IPOD
Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. IV
0.0$10.69+0.5%$611.80 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
MIT
Mason Industrial Technology
0.0$9.73+0.3%$606.25 millionN/A0.00
ETAC
E.Merge Technology Acquisition
0.3$9.81+0.2%$599.15 millionN/A0.00
SEAH
Sports Entertainment Acquisition
0.2$10.26+0.7%$573.19 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
REVH
Revolution Healthcare Acquisition
0.0$9.89+0.3%$572.88 millionN/A0.00
JIH
Juniper Industrial
0.3$13.19+0.2%$568.89 millionN/A0.00
HAAC
Health Assurance Acquisition
0.2$10.18+0.9%$568.70 millionN/A0.00
GOAC
GO Acquisition
0.3$9.84+0.1%$566.38 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
TPGY
TPG Pace Beneficial Finance
0.5$12.96+1.0%$561.31 millionN/A0.00
PRPC
CC Neuberger Principal Holdings III
0.0$9.85+0.0%$544.83 millionN/A0.00
CCAP
Crescent Capital BDC
1.5$18.60+1.4%$516.59 million$77.11 million3.46
TBCP
Thunder Bridge Capital Partners III
0.0$9.77+0.2%$516.45 millionN/A0.00
FMAC
FirstMark Horizon Acquisition
0.3$9.95+0.3%$513.36 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
EQD
Equity Distribution Acquisition
0.2$9.83+0.4%$510.77 millionN/A0.00High Trading Volume
Decrease in Short Interest
MOTV
Motive Capital
0.2$9.80+0.3%$505.60 millionN/A0.00
HHLA
HH&L Acquisition
0.0$9.78+0.2%$505.08 millionN/A0.00
SNRH
Senior Connect Acquisition Corp. I
0.2$9.71+0.2%$501.41 millionN/A0.00
CTAQ
Carney Technology Acquisition Corp. II
0.2$9.78+0.3%$499.32 millionN/A0.00
DCRN
Decarbonization Plus Acquisition Co. II
0.0$9.87+0.3%$498.10 millionN/A0.00
EPHY
Epiphany Technology Acquisition
0.0$9.74+0.2%$496.81 millionN/A0.00
FCAX
Fortress Capital Acquisition
0.0$9.84+0.3%$493.50 millionN/A0.00
IIAC
Investindustrial Acquisition
0.2$9.78+0.1%$491.55 millionN/A0.00
This page was last updated on 6/14/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more about MarketBeat.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.