Boulder Growth & Income Fund Competitors

DNP Select Income Fund (NYSE:DNP) and Boulder Growth & Income Fund (NYSE:BIF) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

5.7% of DNP Select Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.1% of Boulder Growth & Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of DNP Select Income Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Boulder Growth & Income Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares DNP Select Income Fund and Boulder Growth & Income Fund's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares DNP Select Income Fund and Boulder Growth & Income Fund's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for DNP Select Income Fund and Boulder Growth & Income Fund, as reported by MarketBeat.

Volatility & Risk

DNP Select Income Fund has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boulder Growth & Income Fund has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

DNP Select Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. Boulder Growth & Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. DNP Select Income Fund has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Boulder Growth & Income Fund has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Boulder Growth & Income Fund beats DNP Select Income Fund on 3 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nuveen Municipal Value Fund (NYSE:NUV) and Boulder Growth & Income Fund (NYSE:BIF) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

12.7% of Nuveen Municipal Value Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.1% of Boulder Growth & Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Nuveen Municipal Value Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Boulder Growth & Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Nuveen Municipal Value Fund and Boulder Growth & Income Fund's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Nuveen Municipal Value Fund and Boulder Growth & Income Fund's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for Nuveen Municipal Value Fund and Boulder Growth & Income Fund, as reported by MarketBeat.

Risk and Volatility

Nuveen Municipal Value Fund has a beta of 0.17, meaning that its stock price is 83% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boulder Growth & Income Fund has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Nuveen Municipal Value Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Boulder Growth & Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Nuveen Municipal Value Fund has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Boulder Growth & Income Fund has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Nuveen Municipal Value Fund beats Boulder Growth & Income Fund on 3 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

Adams Diversified Equity Fund (NYSE:ADX) and Boulder Growth & Income Fund (NYSE:BIF) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

14.9% of Adams Diversified Equity Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.1% of Boulder Growth & Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Adams Diversified Equity Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Boulder Growth & Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Adams Diversified Equity Fund and Boulder Growth & Income Fund's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Adams Diversified Equity Fund and Boulder Growth & Income Fund's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for Adams Diversified Equity Fund and Boulder Growth & Income Fund, as reported by MarketBeat.

Risk and Volatility

Adams Diversified Equity Fund has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boulder Growth & Income Fund has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Adams Diversified Equity Fund pays an annual dividend of $1.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Boulder Growth & Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Adams Diversified Equity Fund has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Boulder Growth & Income Fund has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Adams Diversified Equity Fund beats Boulder Growth & Income Fund on 3 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) and Boulder Growth & Income Fund (NYSE:BIF) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

13.8% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.1% of Boulder Growth & Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Boulder Growth & Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Goldman Sachs BDC and Boulder Growth & Income Fund's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Goldman Sachs BDC and Boulder Growth & Income Fund's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Boulder Growth & Income Fund.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for Goldman Sachs BDC and Boulder Growth & Income Fund, as reported by MarketBeat.

Goldman Sachs BDC currently has a consensus price target of $15.9167, indicating a potential downside of 22.43%. Given Goldman Sachs BDC's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more favorable than Boulder Growth & Income Fund.

Risk and Volatility

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boulder Growth & Income Fund has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.8%. Boulder Growth & Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 90.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Goldman Sachs BDC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Boulder Growth & Income Fund has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Goldman Sachs BDC beats Boulder Growth & Income Fund on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund (NYSE:PTY) and Boulder Growth & Income Fund (NYSE:BIF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund and Boulder Growth & Income Fund's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boulder Growth & Income Fund has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.4%. Boulder Growth & Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Boulder Growth & Income Fund has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund and Boulder Growth & Income Fund's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

6.9% of PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.1% of Boulder Growth & Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Boulder Growth & Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund and Boulder Growth & Income Fund, as reported by MarketBeat.

Summary

Boulder Growth & Income Fund beats PIMCO Corporate & Income Opportunity Fund on 3 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hercules Capital (NYSE:HTGC) and Boulder Growth & Income Fund (NYSE:BIF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Hercules Capital and Boulder Growth & Income Fund's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Hercules Capital has a beta of 1.57, indicating that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boulder Growth & Income Fund has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Hercules Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.6%. Boulder Growth & Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Hercules Capital pays out 90.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hercules Capital has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Boulder Growth & Income Fund has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Hercules Capital and Boulder Growth & Income Fund's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Hercules Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Boulder Growth & Income Fund.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

28.9% of Hercules Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.1% of Boulder Growth & Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Hercules Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Boulder Growth & Income Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Hercules Capital and Boulder Growth & Income Fund, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Hercules Capital presently has a consensus price target of $13.8438, indicating a potential downside of 18.13%. Given Hercules Capital's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hercules Capital is more favorable than Boulder Growth & Income Fund.

Summary

Hercules Capital beats Boulder Growth & Income Fund on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.