NYSE:CLR

Continental Resources Competitors

$25.06

+0.88 (+3.64 %)

(As of 03/1/2021 12:00 AM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$24.33

Now: $25.06▼

$25.43

50-Day Range

$18.88

MA: $21.27▼

$25.70

52-Week Range

$6.90

Now: $25.06▼

$26.29

Volume1.67 million shs

Average Volume2.90 million shs

Market Capitalization$9.15 billion

P/E RatioN/A

Dividend YieldN/A

Beta3.37

Continental Resources (NYSE:CLR) Vs. COP, EOG, PXD, DVN, FANG, and MRO

Should you be buying CLR stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "oil & gas exploration & production" are considered alternatives and competitors to Continental Resources, including ConocoPhillips (COP), EOG Resources (EOG), Pioneer Natural Resources (PXD), Devon Energy (DVN), Diamondback Energy (FANG), and Marathon Oil (MRO).

Continental Resources vs. ConocoPhillips Stock

Continental Resources (NYSE:CLR) and ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

14.8% of Continental Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.9% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by institutional investors. 79.6% of Continental Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Continental Resources and ConocoPhillips' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Continental Resources	-10.54%	-2.05%	-0.91%
ConocoPhillips	-5.66%	-0.02%	-0.01%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Continental Resources and ConocoPhillips, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Continental Resources	3	17	4	0	2.04
ConocoPhillips	0	2	19	0	2.90

Continental Resources currently has a consensus target price of $17.1250, indicating a potential downside of 31.66%. ConocoPhillips has a consensus target price of $51.5417, indicating a potential downside of 2.03%. Given ConocoPhillips' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than Continental Resources.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Continental Resources and ConocoPhillips' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Continental Resources	$4.63 billion	1.98	$775.64 million	$2.25	11.14
ConocoPhillips	$36.67 billion	1.94	$7.19 billion	$3.59	14.65

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Continental Resources. Continental Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Continental Resources has a beta of 3.37, meaning that its share price is 237% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.85, meaning that its share price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

ConocoPhillips beats Continental Resources on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Continental Resources vs. EOG Resources Stock

Continental Resources (NYSE:CLR) and EOG Resources (NYSE:EOG) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

14.8% of Continental Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.7% of EOG Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 79.6% of Continental Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of EOG Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Continental Resources and EOG Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Continental Resources	-10.54%	-2.05%	-0.91%
EOG Resources	-2.47%	5.86%	3.38%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Continental Resources and EOG Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Continental Resources	3	17	4	0	2.04
EOG Resources	0	8	16	0	2.67

Continental Resources currently has a consensus target price of $17.1250, indicating a potential downside of 31.66%. EOG Resources has a consensus target price of $66.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.57%. Given EOG Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe EOG Resources is more favorable than Continental Resources.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Continental Resources and EOG Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Continental Resources	$4.63 billion	1.98	$775.64 million	$2.25	11.14
EOG Resources	$17.38 billion	2.18	$2.73 billion	$4.98	13.05

EOG Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Continental Resources. Continental Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EOG Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Continental Resources has a beta of 3.37, meaning that its share price is 237% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EOG Resources has a beta of 2.09, meaning that its share price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

EOG Resources beats Continental Resources on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Continental Resources vs. Pioneer Natural Resources Stock

Continental Resources (NYSE:CLR) and Pioneer Natural Resources (NYSE:PXD) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

14.8% of Continental Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.9% of Pioneer Natural Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 79.6% of Continental Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Pioneer Natural Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Continental Resources and Pioneer Natural Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Continental Resources	-10.54%	-2.05%	-0.91%
Pioneer Natural Resources	2.30%	4.67%	2.97%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Continental Resources and Pioneer Natural Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Continental Resources	3	17	4	0	2.04
Pioneer Natural Resources	0	2	21	1	2.96

Continental Resources currently has a consensus target price of $17.1250, indicating a potential downside of 31.66%. Pioneer Natural Resources has a consensus target price of $140.0435, indicating a potential downside of 5.68%. Given Pioneer Natural Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Pioneer Natural Resources is more favorable than Continental Resources.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Continental Resources and Pioneer Natural Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Continental Resources	$4.63 billion	1.98	$775.64 million	$2.25	11.14
Pioneer Natural Resources	$9.30 billion	2.63	$756 million	$8.18	18.15

Continental Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pioneer Natural Resources. Continental Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pioneer Natural Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Continental Resources has a beta of 3.37, meaning that its share price is 237% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pioneer Natural Resources has a beta of 1.92, meaning that its share price is 92% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Pioneer Natural Resources beats Continental Resources on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Continental Resources vs. Devon Energy Stock

Continental Resources (NYSE:CLR) and Devon Energy (NYSE:DVN) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

14.8% of Continental Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.9% of Devon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 79.6% of Continental Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Devon Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Continental Resources and Devon Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Continental Resources	-10.54%	-2.05%	-0.91%
Devon Energy	-62.68%	2.38%	0.86%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Continental Resources and Devon Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Continental Resources	3	17	4	0	2.04
Devon Energy	0	2	17	1	2.95

Continental Resources currently has a consensus target price of $17.1250, indicating a potential downside of 31.66%. Devon Energy has a consensus target price of $18.2143, indicating a potential downside of 18.69%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than Continental Resources.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Continental Resources and Devon Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Continental Resources	$4.63 billion	1.98	$775.64 million	$2.25	11.14
Devon Energy	$6.22 billion	2.42	$-355,000,000.00	$1.38	16.23

Continental Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Devon Energy. Continental Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Devon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Continental Resources has a beta of 3.37, meaning that its share price is 237% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Devon Energy has a beta of 3.46, meaning that its share price is 246% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Devon Energy beats Continental Resources on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Continental Resources vs. Diamondback Energy Stock

Continental Resources (NYSE:CLR) and Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

14.8% of Continental Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.1% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 79.6% of Continental Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Continental Resources and Diamondback Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Continental Resources	-10.54%	-2.05%	-0.91%
Diamondback Energy	-135.48%	5.10%	3.06%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Continental Resources and Diamondback Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Continental Resources	3	17	4	0	2.04
Diamondback Energy	0	3	22	1	2.92

Continental Resources currently has a consensus target price of $17.1250, indicating a potential downside of 31.66%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus target price of $66.0893, indicating a potential downside of 10.28%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than Continental Resources.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Continental Resources and Diamondback Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Continental Resources	$4.63 billion	1.98	$775.64 million	$2.25	11.14
Diamondback Energy	$3.96 billion	2.94	$240 million	$6.93	10.63

Continental Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. Diamondback Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Continental Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Continental Resources has a beta of 3.37, meaning that its share price is 237% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 2.59, meaning that its share price is 159% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats Continental Resources on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Continental Resources vs. Marathon Oil Stock

Continental Resources (NYSE:CLR) and Marathon Oil (NYSE:MRO) are both mid-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

14.8% of Continental Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.1% of Marathon Oil shares are owned by institutional investors. 79.6% of Continental Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Marathon Oil shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Continental Resources and Marathon Oil's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Continental Resources	-10.54%	-2.05%	-0.91%
Marathon Oil	-32.64%	-6.64%	-3.97%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Continental Resources and Marathon Oil, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Continental Resources	3	17	4	0	2.04
Marathon Oil	4	10	10	0	2.25

Continental Resources currently has a consensus target price of $17.1250, indicating a potential downside of 31.66%. Marathon Oil has a consensus target price of $7.6921, indicating a potential downside of 31.32%. Given Marathon Oil's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Marathon Oil is more favorable than Continental Resources.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Continental Resources and Marathon Oil's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Continental Resources	$4.63 billion	1.98	$775.64 million	$2.25	11.14
Marathon Oil	$5.19 billion	1.70	$480 million	$0.75	14.93

Continental Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Marathon Oil. Continental Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Continental Resources has a beta of 3.37, meaning that its share price is 237% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Marathon Oil has a beta of 3.36, meaning that its share price is 236% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Continental Resources beats Marathon Oil on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.