CatchMark Timber Trust Competitors

Two Harbors Investment (NYSE:TWO) and CatchMark Timber Trust (NYSE:CTT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Two Harbors Investment and CatchMark Timber Trust, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Two Harbors Investment presently has a consensus price target of $6.50, suggesting a potential downside of 9.97%. CatchMark Timber Trust has a consensus price target of $11.6250, suggesting a potential upside of 13.86%. Given CatchMark Timber Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CatchMark Timber Trust is more favorable than Two Harbors Investment.

Dividends

Two Harbors Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. CatchMark Timber Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Two Harbors Investment pays out 49.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CatchMark Timber Trust pays out -26.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Two Harbors Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and CatchMark Timber Trust has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

59.7% of Two Harbors Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.9% of CatchMark Timber Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Two Harbors Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of CatchMark Timber Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Two Harbors Investment and CatchMark Timber Trust's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Two Harbors Investment has higher revenue and earnings than CatchMark Timber Trust. CatchMark Timber Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Two Harbors Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Two Harbors Investment has a beta of 1.75, suggesting that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CatchMark Timber Trust has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Two Harbors Investment and CatchMark Timber Trust's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Broadstone Net Lease (NYSE:BNL) and CatchMark Timber Trust (NYSE:CTT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Broadstone Net Lease and CatchMark Timber Trust's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Broadstone Net Lease has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CatchMark Timber Trust.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Broadstone Net Lease and CatchMark Timber Trust, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Broadstone Net Lease currently has a consensus target price of $20.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 14.24%. CatchMark Timber Trust has a consensus target price of $11.6250, suggesting a potential upside of 13.86%. Given Broadstone Net Lease's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Broadstone Net Lease is more favorable than CatchMark Timber Trust.

Dividends

Broadstone Net Lease pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. CatchMark Timber Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. CatchMark Timber Trust pays out -26.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Broadstone Net Lease has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and CatchMark Timber Trust has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Broadstone Net Lease and CatchMark Timber Trust's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

61.1% of Broadstone Net Lease shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.9% of CatchMark Timber Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of CatchMark Timber Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Broadstone Net Lease beats CatchMark Timber Trust on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

CatchMark Timber Trust (NYSE:CTT) and The Macerich (NYSE:MAC) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and profitability.

Dividends

CatchMark Timber Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. The Macerich pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. CatchMark Timber Trust pays out -26.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Macerich pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CatchMark Timber Trust has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and The Macerich has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CatchMark Timber Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for CatchMark Timber Trust and The Macerich, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

CatchMark Timber Trust presently has a consensus price target of $11.6250, suggesting a potential upside of 13.86%. The Macerich has a consensus price target of $9.50, suggesting a potential downside of 26.47%. Given CatchMark Timber Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CatchMark Timber Trust is more favorable than The Macerich.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

76.9% of CatchMark Timber Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.8% of The Macerich shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of CatchMark Timber Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of The Macerich shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

CatchMark Timber Trust has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Macerich has a beta of 2.07, suggesting that its stock price is 107% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares CatchMark Timber Trust and The Macerich's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares CatchMark Timber Trust and The Macerich's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

The Macerich has higher revenue and earnings than CatchMark Timber Trust. CatchMark Timber Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Macerich, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

The Macerich beats CatchMark Timber Trust on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Washington Real Estate Investment Trust (NYSE:WRE) and CatchMark Timber Trust (NYSE:CTT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Dividends

Washington Real Estate Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. CatchMark Timber Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Washington Real Estate Investment Trust pays out 72.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CatchMark Timber Trust pays out -26.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Washington Real Estate Investment Trust has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and CatchMark Timber Trust has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

86.4% of Washington Real Estate Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.9% of CatchMark Timber Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Washington Real Estate Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of CatchMark Timber Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Washington Real Estate Investment Trust and CatchMark Timber Trust's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Washington Real Estate Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than CatchMark Timber Trust. CatchMark Timber Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Washington Real Estate Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Washington Real Estate Investment Trust has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CatchMark Timber Trust has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Washington Real Estate Investment Trust and CatchMark Timber Trust's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Washington Real Estate Investment Trust and CatchMark Timber Trust, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Washington Real Estate Investment Trust currently has a consensus target price of $23.20, suggesting a potential upside of 3.02%. CatchMark Timber Trust has a consensus target price of $11.6250, suggesting a potential upside of 13.86%. Given CatchMark Timber Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe CatchMark Timber Trust is more favorable than Washington Real Estate Investment Trust.

Summary

Washington Real Estate Investment Trust beats CatchMark Timber Trust on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

CatchMark Timber Trust (NYSE:CTT) and Empire State Realty Trust (NYSE:ESRT) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

76.9% of CatchMark Timber Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.1% of Empire State Realty Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of CatchMark Timber Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.1% of Empire State Realty Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for CatchMark Timber Trust and Empire State Realty Trust, as reported by MarketBeat.

CatchMark Timber Trust presently has a consensus price target of $11.6250, suggesting a potential upside of 13.86%. Empire State Realty Trust has a consensus price target of $10.1250, suggesting a potential downside of 8.04%. Given CatchMark Timber Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe CatchMark Timber Trust is more favorable than Empire State Realty Trust.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares CatchMark Timber Trust and Empire State Realty Trust's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Empire State Realty Trust has higher revenue and earnings than CatchMark Timber Trust. CatchMark Timber Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Empire State Realty Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

CatchMark Timber Trust has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its share price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Empire State Realty Trust has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares CatchMark Timber Trust and Empire State Realty Trust's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Empire State Realty Trust beats CatchMark Timber Trust on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

CatchMark Timber Trust (NYSE:CTT) and American Assets Trust (NYSE:AAT) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and risk.

Profitability

This table compares CatchMark Timber Trust and American Assets Trust's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares CatchMark Timber Trust and American Assets Trust's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

American Assets Trust has higher revenue and earnings than CatchMark Timber Trust. CatchMark Timber Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than American Assets Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

CatchMark Timber Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. American Assets Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. CatchMark Timber Trust pays out -26.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. American Assets Trust pays out 45.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CatchMark Timber Trust has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and American Assets Trust has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CatchMark Timber Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Volatility & Risk

CatchMark Timber Trust has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its share price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, American Assets Trust has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its share price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for CatchMark Timber Trust and American Assets Trust, as provided by MarketBeat.

CatchMark Timber Trust currently has a consensus target price of $11.6250, suggesting a potential upside of 13.86%. American Assets Trust has a consensus target price of $30.75, suggesting a potential downside of 1.06%. Given CatchMark Timber Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe CatchMark Timber Trust is more favorable than American Assets Trust.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

76.9% of CatchMark Timber Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.1% of American Assets Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of CatchMark Timber Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 32.8% of American Assets Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

American Assets Trust beats CatchMark Timber Trust on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.