S&P 500   3,849.62
DOW   30,937.04
QQQ   328.59
S&P 500   3,849.62
DOW   30,937.04
QQQ   328.59
S&P 500   3,849.62
DOW   30,937.04
QQQ   328.59
S&P 500   3,849.62
DOW   30,937.04
QQQ   328.59
Log in
NYSE:MR

Montage Resources Competitors

Notice: This company has been marked as potentially delisted and may not be actively trading.
$5.36
0.00 (0.00 %)
(As of 11/13/2020)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$5.36
Now: $5.36
$5.36
50-Day Range
$4.62
MA: $5.28
$5.78
52-Week Range
$1.99
Now: $5.36
$8.30
VolumeN/A
Average Volume666,645 shs
Market Capitalization$193.09 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta3.91

Competitors

Montage Resources (NYSE:MR) Vs. GPRK, TALO, VET, PARR, ERF, and QEP

Should you be buying MR stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "crude petroleum & natural gas" are considered alternatives and competitors to Montage Resources, including GeoPark (GPRK), Talos Energy (TALO), Vermilion Energy (VET), Par Pacific (PARR), Enerplus (ERF), and QEP Resources (QEP).

GeoPark (NYSE:GPRK) and Montage Resources (NYSE:MR) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for GeoPark and Montage Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
GeoPark02602.75
Montage Resources07102.13

GeoPark currently has a consensus target price of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 48.90%. Montage Resources has a consensus target price of $6.3857, suggesting a potential upside of 19.14%. Given GeoPark's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe GeoPark is more favorable than Montage Resources.

Profitability

This table compares GeoPark and Montage Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
GeoPark-25.59%14.07%0.59%
Montage Resources-8.49%2.74%1.39%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

39.8% of GeoPark shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.0% of Montage Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Montage Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

GeoPark has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Montage Resources has a beta of 3.91, indicating that its stock price is 291% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares GeoPark and Montage Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GeoPark$628.91 million1.21$57.76 million$1.588.08
Montage Resources$634.44 million0.30$31.76 million$2.292.34

GeoPark has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Montage Resources. Montage Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GeoPark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Montage Resources beats GeoPark on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Montage Resources (NYSE:MR) and Talos Energy (NYSE:TALO) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Montage Resources and Talos Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Montage Resources-8.49%2.74%1.39%
Talos Energy-5.36%1.20%0.50%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Montage Resources and Talos Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Montage Resources07102.13
Talos Energy00703.00

Montage Resources currently has a consensus target price of $6.3857, indicating a potential upside of 19.14%. Talos Energy has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 62.69%. Given Talos Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Talos Energy is more favorable than Montage Resources.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Montage Resources and Talos Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Montage Resources$634.44 million0.30$31.76 million$2.292.34
Talos Energy$927.62 million0.81$58.73 million$3.562.59

Talos Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Montage Resources. Montage Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Talos Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Montage Resources has a beta of 3.91, indicating that its share price is 291% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Talos Energy has a beta of 3.15, indicating that its share price is 215% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

71.0% of Montage Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.7% of Talos Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Montage Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Talos Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Talos Energy beats Montage Resources on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Vermilion Energy (NYSE:VET) and Montage Resources (NYSE:MR) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Vermilion Energy and Montage Resources' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vermilion Energy$1.27 billion0.58$24.72 million$0.3314.15
Montage Resources$634.44 million0.30$31.76 million$2.292.34

Montage Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vermilion Energy. Montage Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vermilion Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Vermilion Energy has a beta of 3, suggesting that its share price is 200% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Montage Resources has a beta of 3.91, suggesting that its share price is 291% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Vermilion Energy and Montage Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Vermilion Energy28302.08
Montage Resources07102.13

Vermilion Energy currently has a consensus target price of $9.6364, indicating a potential upside of 106.35%. Montage Resources has a consensus target price of $6.3857, indicating a potential upside of 19.14%. Given Vermilion Energy's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Vermilion Energy is more favorable than Montage Resources.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

13.6% of Vermilion Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.0% of Montage Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Montage Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Vermilion Energy and Montage Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Vermilion Energy-121.97%-11.06%-3.32%
Montage Resources-8.49%2.74%1.39%

Summary

Montage Resources beats Vermilion Energy on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Par Pacific (NYSE:PARR) and Montage Resources (NYSE:MR) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Par Pacific and Montage Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Par Pacific$5.40 billion0.14$40.81 million$1.797.57
Montage Resources$634.44 million0.30$31.76 million$2.292.34

Par Pacific has higher revenue and earnings than Montage Resources. Montage Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Par Pacific, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Par Pacific and Montage Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Par Pacific-6.35%-26.28%-5.21%
Montage Resources-8.49%2.74%1.39%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

92.9% of Par Pacific shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.0% of Montage Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Par Pacific shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Montage Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Par Pacific has a beta of 2.51, suggesting that its stock price is 151% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Montage Resources has a beta of 3.91, suggesting that its stock price is 291% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Par Pacific and Montage Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Par Pacific24101.86
Montage Resources07102.13

Par Pacific currently has a consensus target price of $14.6429, indicating a potential upside of 8.07%. Montage Resources has a consensus target price of $6.3857, indicating a potential upside of 19.14%. Given Montage Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Montage Resources is more favorable than Par Pacific.

Summary

Montage Resources beats Par Pacific on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Enerplus (NYSE:ERF) and Montage Resources (NYSE:MR) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Enerplus and Montage Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Enerplus$945.62 million0.77$-195,730,000.00$0.794.13
Montage Resources$634.44 million0.30$31.76 million$2.292.34

Montage Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Enerplus. Montage Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enerplus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Enerplus has a beta of 3.18, indicating that its stock price is 218% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Montage Resources has a beta of 3.91, indicating that its stock price is 291% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Enerplus and Montage Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Enerplus02802.80
Montage Resources07102.13

Enerplus currently has a consensus target price of $4.9063, suggesting a potential upside of 50.50%. Montage Resources has a consensus target price of $6.3857, suggesting a potential upside of 19.14%. Given Enerplus' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Enerplus is more favorable than Montage Resources.

Profitability

This table compares Enerplus and Montage Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Enerplus-130.21%2.91%1.54%
Montage Resources-8.49%2.74%1.39%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

51.0% of Enerplus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.0% of Montage Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Montage Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Enerplus beats Montage Resources on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

QEP Resources (NYSE:QEP) and Montage Resources (NYSE:MR) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings and risk.

Profitability

This table compares QEP Resources and Montage Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
QEP Resources2.77%1.39%0.71%
Montage Resources-8.49%2.74%1.39%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for QEP Resources and Montage Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
QEP Resources26202.00
Montage Resources07102.13

QEP Resources currently has a consensus target price of $1.7375, suggesting a potential downside of 41.10%. Montage Resources has a consensus target price of $6.3857, suggesting a potential upside of 19.14%. Given Montage Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Montage Resources is more favorable than QEP Resources.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

55.6% of QEP Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.0% of Montage Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of QEP Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Montage Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

QEP Resources has a beta of 5.24, suggesting that its share price is 424% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Montage Resources has a beta of 3.91, suggesting that its share price is 291% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares QEP Resources and Montage Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
QEP Resources$1.21 billion0.59$-97,300,000.00N/AN/A
Montage Resources$634.44 million0.30$31.76 million$2.292.34

Montage Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than QEP Resources.

Summary

QEP Resources beats Montage Resources on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.


Montage Resources Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
GeoPark logo
GPRK
GeoPark
1.8$12.76flat$759.53 million$628.91 million-6.79
Talos Energy logo
TALO
Talos Energy
1.8$9.22flat$749.40 million$927.62 million-54.23
Vermilion Energy logo
VET
Vermilion Energy
1.6$4.67flat$741.24 million$1.27 billion-0.67
PARR
Par Pacific
1.1$13.55flat$731.40 million$5.40 billion-2.99Analyst Revision
Gap Down
Enerplus logo
ERF
Enerplus
2.5$3.26flat$727.54 million$945.62 million-0.86High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Up
QEP Resources logo
QEP
QEP Resources
1.1$2.95flat$714.55 million$1.21 billion24.59Analyst Downgrade
Centennial Resource Development logo
CDEV
Centennial Resource Development
1.2$2.27flat$631.83 million$944.33 million-1.07Analyst Downgrade
Kimbell Royalty Partners logo
KRP
Kimbell Royalty Partners
1.8$8.88flat$530.39 million$108.22 million-1.63Dividend Announcement
Callon Petroleum logo
CPE
Callon Petroleum
1.7$13.04flat$518.38 million$671.57 million-0.25
Dorchester Minerals logo
DMLP
Dorchester Minerals
1.2$12.74flat$441.82 million$78.80 million16.13Dividend Cut
Bonanza Creek Energy logo
BCEI
Bonanza Creek Energy
1.6$20.25flat$421.89 million$313.22 million10.38Analyst Upgrade
Hess Midstream logo
HESM
Hess Midstream
1.9$21.91flat$394.99 million$848.30 million17.81Dividend Announcement
Earthstone Energy logo
ESTE
Earthstone Energy
1.5$5.34flat$348.28 million$191.26 million-21.36
W&T Offshore logo
WTI
W&T Offshore
1.3$2.44flat$345.94 million$534.90 million2.39
Berry Petroleum logo
BRY
Berry Petroleum
1.3$4.14flat$330.91 million$559.41 million-1.60
Laredo Petroleum logo
LPI
Laredo Petroleum
0.9$24.64flat$295.78 million$837.28 million-0.36News Coverage
Gap Down
FLMN
Falcon Minerals
1.7$3.34flat$287.55 million$68.46 million33.40
VIST
Vista Oil & Gas
0.5$2.73flat$238.34 million$415.98 million-1.78
TRCH
Torchlight Energy Resources
0.6$1.91flat$189.72 million$750,000.00-9.55Gap Down
TETRA Technologies logo
TTI
TETRA Technologies
0.8$1.35flat$170.07 million$1.04 billion-1.15
SandRidge Energy logo
SD
SandRidge Energy
0.5$4.48flat$160.96 million$266.85 million-0.30Gap Down
Penn Virginia logo
PVAC
Penn Virginia
1.2$10.58flat$160.82 million$471.22 million-0.94
VAALCO Energy logo
EGY
VAALCO Energy
0.6$2.32flat$133.30 million$84.52 million-3.09News Coverage
BATL
Battalion Oil
0.3$7.45flat$120.72 millionN/A-0.68
EPSN
Epsilon Energy
0.6$3.61flat$86.13 million$26.69 million60.18Gap Down
PNRG
PrimeEnergy Resources
0.8$39.70flat$79.16 million$104.82 million0.00
Mid-Con Energy Partners logo
MCEP
Mid-Con Energy Partners
0.5$5.52flat$79.00 million$55.50 million-0.67
TransGlobe Energy logo
TGA
TransGlobe Energy
1.0$1.05flat$76.17 million$278.93 million-0.92
AMPY
Amplify Energy
1.2$1.98flat$74.56 million$275.58 million-0.16
PHX
PHX Minerals
1.4$3.00flat$67.17 million$28.97 million-2.17
SilverBow Resources logo
SBOW
SilverBow Resources
1.9$5.60flat$66.85 million$288.63 million-0.21
VOC Energy Trust logo
VOC
VOC Energy Trust
1.1$2.66flat$45.22 million$9.21 million4.93Dividend Cut
MV Oil Trust logo
MVO
MV Oil Trust
1.0$3.77flat$43.36 million$12.99 million4.05Gap Down
HighPoint Resources logo
HPR
HighPoint Resources
1.5$9.37flat$40.34 million$452.66 million-0.03
PermRock Royalty Trust logo
PRT
PermRock Royalty Trust
1.3$3.17flat$38.58 million$10.44 million0.00
PVL
Permianville Royalty Trust
0.8$1.05flat$34.65 million$44.96 million4.77Gap Up
Abraxas Petroleum logo
AXAS
Abraxas Petroleum
0.8$2.65flat$22.27 million$129.15 million0.00Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
Sundance Energy logo
SNDE
Sundance Energy
0.9$2.33flat$16.02 million$203.58 million-4.02News Coverage
Gap Up
Gulfport Energy logo
GPOR
Gulfport Energy
2.0$0.10flat$15.67 million$1.35 billion-0.01
U.S. Energy logo
USEG
U.S. Energy
0.8$4.75flat$13.85 million$6.57 million0.00Gap Up
This page was last updated on 1/27/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.