Montage Resources Competitors

GeoPark (NYSE:GPRK) and Montage Resources (NYSE:MR) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for GeoPark and Montage Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

GeoPark currently has a consensus target price of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 48.90%. Montage Resources has a consensus target price of $6.3857, suggesting a potential upside of 19.14%. Given GeoPark's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe GeoPark is more favorable than Montage Resources.

Profitability

This table compares GeoPark and Montage Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

39.8% of GeoPark shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.0% of Montage Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Montage Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

GeoPark has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Montage Resources has a beta of 3.91, indicating that its stock price is 291% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares GeoPark and Montage Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

GeoPark has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Montage Resources. Montage Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GeoPark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Montage Resources beats GeoPark on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Montage Resources (NYSE:MR) and Talos Energy (NYSE:TALO) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Montage Resources and Talos Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Montage Resources and Talos Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Montage Resources currently has a consensus target price of $6.3857, indicating a potential upside of 19.14%. Talos Energy has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 62.69%. Given Talos Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Talos Energy is more favorable than Montage Resources.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Montage Resources and Talos Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Talos Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Montage Resources. Montage Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Talos Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Montage Resources has a beta of 3.91, indicating that its share price is 291% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Talos Energy has a beta of 3.15, indicating that its share price is 215% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

71.0% of Montage Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.7% of Talos Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Montage Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Talos Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Talos Energy beats Montage Resources on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Vermilion Energy (NYSE:VET) and Montage Resources (NYSE:MR) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Vermilion Energy and Montage Resources' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Montage Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vermilion Energy. Montage Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vermilion Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Vermilion Energy has a beta of 3, suggesting that its share price is 200% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Montage Resources has a beta of 3.91, suggesting that its share price is 291% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Vermilion Energy and Montage Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

Vermilion Energy currently has a consensus target price of $9.6364, indicating a potential upside of 106.35%. Montage Resources has a consensus target price of $6.3857, indicating a potential upside of 19.14%. Given Vermilion Energy's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Vermilion Energy is more favorable than Montage Resources.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

13.6% of Vermilion Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.0% of Montage Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Montage Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Vermilion Energy and Montage Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Montage Resources beats Vermilion Energy on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Par Pacific (NYSE:PARR) and Montage Resources (NYSE:MR) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Par Pacific and Montage Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Par Pacific has higher revenue and earnings than Montage Resources. Montage Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Par Pacific, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Par Pacific and Montage Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

92.9% of Par Pacific shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.0% of Montage Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Par Pacific shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Montage Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Par Pacific has a beta of 2.51, suggesting that its stock price is 151% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Montage Resources has a beta of 3.91, suggesting that its stock price is 291% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Par Pacific and Montage Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Par Pacific currently has a consensus target price of $14.6429, indicating a potential upside of 8.07%. Montage Resources has a consensus target price of $6.3857, indicating a potential upside of 19.14%. Given Montage Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Montage Resources is more favorable than Par Pacific.

Summary

Montage Resources beats Par Pacific on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Enerplus (NYSE:ERF) and Montage Resources (NYSE:MR) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Enerplus and Montage Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Montage Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Enerplus. Montage Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enerplus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Enerplus has a beta of 3.18, indicating that its stock price is 218% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Montage Resources has a beta of 3.91, indicating that its stock price is 291% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Enerplus and Montage Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Enerplus currently has a consensus target price of $4.9063, suggesting a potential upside of 50.50%. Montage Resources has a consensus target price of $6.3857, suggesting a potential upside of 19.14%. Given Enerplus' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Enerplus is more favorable than Montage Resources.

Profitability

This table compares Enerplus and Montage Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

51.0% of Enerplus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.0% of Montage Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Montage Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Enerplus beats Montage Resources on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

QEP Resources (NYSE:QEP) and Montage Resources (NYSE:MR) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings and risk.

Profitability

This table compares QEP Resources and Montage Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for QEP Resources and Montage Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

QEP Resources currently has a consensus target price of $1.7375, suggesting a potential downside of 41.10%. Montage Resources has a consensus target price of $6.3857, suggesting a potential upside of 19.14%. Given Montage Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Montage Resources is more favorable than QEP Resources.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

55.6% of QEP Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.0% of Montage Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of QEP Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Montage Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

QEP Resources has a beta of 5.24, suggesting that its share price is 424% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Montage Resources has a beta of 3.91, suggesting that its share price is 291% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares QEP Resources and Montage Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Montage Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than QEP Resources.

Summary

QEP Resources beats Montage Resources on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.