S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
pixel
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
pixel
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
pixel
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
pixel
Log in
NYSE:SMLP

Summit Midstream Partners Competitors

$20.37
-1.63 (-7.41 %)
(As of 02/26/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$20.30
Now: $20.37
$22.00
50-Day Range
$12.62
MA: $17.80
$22.80
52-Week Range
$7.50
Now: $20.37
$35.85
Volume52,237 shs
Average Volume102,251 shs
Market Capitalization$76.90 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta3.29

Competitors

Summit Midstream Partners (NYSE:SMLP) Vs. EPD, NGG, TRP, KMI, WMB, and ET

Should you be buying SMLP stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "natural gas transmission" are considered alternatives and competitors to Summit Midstream Partners, including Enterprise Products Partners (EPD), National Grid (NGG), TC Energy (TRP), Kinder Morgan (KMI), The Williams Companies (WMB), and Energy Transfer (ET).

Summit Midstream Partners (NYSE:SMLP) and Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE:EPD) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, risk and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Summit Midstream Partners has a beta of 3.29, indicating that its share price is 229% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Enterprise Products Partners has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its share price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Summit Midstream Partners and Enterprise Products Partners' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Summit Midstream Partners$443.53 million0.17$-369,830,000.00N/AN/A
Enterprise Products Partners$32.79 billion1.42$4.59 billion$2.159.92

Enterprise Products Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Summit Midstream Partners.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Summit Midstream Partners and Enterprise Products Partners, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Summit Midstream Partners12001.67
Enterprise Products Partners001413.07

Summit Midstream Partners presently has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential downside of 26.36%. Enterprise Products Partners has a consensus price target of $25.2857, suggesting a potential upside of 18.60%. Given Enterprise Products Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Enterprise Products Partners is more favorable than Summit Midstream Partners.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

30.5% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of Enterprise Products Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Summit Midstream Partners and Enterprise Products Partners' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Summit Midstream Partners-59.61%7.05%1.35%
Enterprise Products Partners16.10%17.76%7.40%

Summary

Enterprise Products Partners beats Summit Midstream Partners on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Summit Midstream Partners (NYSE:SMLP) and National Grid (NYSE:NGG) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, risk and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Summit Midstream Partners has a beta of 3.29, indicating that its share price is 229% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, National Grid has a beta of 0.32, indicating that its share price is 68% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Summit Midstream Partners and National Grid's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Summit Midstream Partners$443.53 million0.17$-369,830,000.00N/AN/A
National Grid$18.62 billion2.13$1.61 billion$3.5315.83

National Grid has higher revenue and earnings than Summit Midstream Partners.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Summit Midstream Partners and National Grid, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Summit Midstream Partners12001.67
National Grid05702.58

Summit Midstream Partners presently has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential downside of 26.36%. Given Summit Midstream Partners' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Summit Midstream Partners is more favorable than National Grid.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

4.1% of National Grid shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Summit Midstream Partners and National Grid's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Summit Midstream Partners-59.61%7.05%1.35%
National GridN/AN/AN/A

Summary

National Grid beats Summit Midstream Partners on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Summit Midstream Partners (NYSE:SMLP) and TC Energy (NYSE:TRP) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, risk and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Summit Midstream Partners has a beta of 3.29, indicating that its share price is 229% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TC Energy has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Summit Midstream Partners and TC Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Summit Midstream Partners$443.53 million0.17$-369,830,000.00N/AN/A
TC Energy$9.99 billion3.95$3.12 billion$3.1213.44

TC Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Summit Midstream Partners.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Summit Midstream Partners and TC Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Summit Midstream Partners12001.67
TC Energy041802.82

Summit Midstream Partners presently has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential downside of 26.36%. TC Energy has a consensus price target of $67.8750, suggesting a potential upside of 61.88%. Given TC Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe TC Energy is more favorable than Summit Midstream Partners.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

64.8% of TC Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Summit Midstream Partners and TC Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Summit Midstream Partners-59.61%7.05%1.35%
TC Energy34.82%13.26%3.83%

Summary

TC Energy beats Summit Midstream Partners on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Summit Midstream Partners (NYSE:SMLP) and Kinder Morgan (NYSE:KMI) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, risk and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Summit Midstream Partners has a beta of 3.29, indicating that its share price is 229% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its share price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Summit Midstream Partners and Kinder Morgan's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Summit Midstream Partners$443.53 million0.17$-369,830,000.00N/AN/A
Kinder Morgan$13.21 billion2.52$2.19 billion$0.9515.47

Kinder Morgan has higher revenue and earnings than Summit Midstream Partners.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Summit Midstream Partners and Kinder Morgan, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Summit Midstream Partners12001.67
Kinder Morgan112802.33

Summit Midstream Partners presently has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential downside of 26.36%. Kinder Morgan has a consensus price target of $16.5625, suggesting a potential upside of 12.67%. Given Kinder Morgan's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Kinder Morgan is more favorable than Summit Midstream Partners.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

60.0% of Kinder Morgan shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.2% of Kinder Morgan shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Summit Midstream Partners and Kinder Morgan's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Summit Midstream Partners-59.61%7.05%1.35%
Kinder Morgan1.02%6.07%2.74%

Summary

Kinder Morgan beats Summit Midstream Partners on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Summit Midstream Partners (NYSE:SMLP) and The Williams Companies (NYSE:WMB) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, risk and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Summit Midstream Partners has a beta of 3.29, indicating that its share price is 229% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Williams Companies has a beta of 1.72, indicating that its share price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Summit Midstream Partners and The Williams Companies' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Summit Midstream Partners$443.53 million0.17$-369,830,000.00N/AN/A
The Williams Companies$8.20 billion3.38$850 million$0.9923.07

The Williams Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Summit Midstream Partners.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Summit Midstream Partners and The Williams Companies, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Summit Midstream Partners12001.67
The Williams Companies021212.93

Summit Midstream Partners presently has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential downside of 26.36%. The Williams Companies has a consensus price target of $23.8571, suggesting a potential upside of 4.45%. Given The Williams Companies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe The Williams Companies is more favorable than Summit Midstream Partners.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

83.6% of The Williams Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of The Williams Companies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Summit Midstream Partners and The Williams Companies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Summit Midstream Partners-59.61%7.05%1.35%
The Williams Companies1.86%7.77%2.70%

Summary

The Williams Companies beats Summit Midstream Partners on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Summit Midstream Partners (NYSE:SMLP) and Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, risk and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Summit Midstream Partners has a beta of 3.29, indicating that its share price is 229% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energy Transfer has a beta of 2.54, indicating that its share price is 154% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Summit Midstream Partners and Energy Transfer's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Summit Midstream Partners$443.53 million0.17$-369,830,000.00N/AN/A
Energy Transfer$54.21 billion0.38$3.59 billion$1.455.27

Energy Transfer has higher revenue and earnings than Summit Midstream Partners.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Summit Midstream Partners and Energy Transfer, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Summit Midstream Partners12001.67
Energy Transfer041212.82

Summit Midstream Partners presently has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential downside of 26.36%. Energy Transfer has a consensus price target of $10.3125, suggesting a potential upside of 34.98%. Given Energy Transfer's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Energy Transfer is more favorable than Summit Midstream Partners.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

36.4% of Energy Transfer shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Summit Midstream Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Energy Transfer shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Summit Midstream Partners and Energy Transfer's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Summit Midstream Partners-59.61%7.05%1.35%
Energy Transfer-0.64%8.23%2.79%

Summary

Energy Transfer beats Summit Midstream Partners on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Summit Midstream Partners Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Enterprise Products Partners logo
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners
2.1$21.32-1.9%$46.54 billion$32.79 billion10.35
National Grid logo
NGG
National Grid
1.4$55.89-3.5%$39.67 billion$18.62 billion15.83
TC Energy logo
TRP
TC Energy
2.3$41.93-2.9%$39.42 billion$9.99 billion11.95Dividend Increase
Gap Down
Kinder Morgan logo
KMI
Kinder Morgan
1.9$14.70-4.0%$33.29 billion$13.21 billion294.00Gap Down
The Williams Companies logo
WMB
The Williams Companies
2.0$22.84-2.7%$27.72 billion$8.20 billion207.66Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Insider Selling
ET
Energy Transfer
2.8$7.64-5.5%$20.65 billion$54.21 billion-76.40Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Gap Down
Targa Resources logo
TRGP
Targa Resources
1.6$30.93-3.1%$7.07 billion$8.67 billion-3.94Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Gap Down
Western Midstream Partners logo
WES
Western Midstream Partners
1.7$16.63-2.5%$6.92 billion$2.75 billion18.08Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
DCP Midstream logo
DCP
DCP Midstream
1.7$21.86-1.6%$4.55 billion$7.63 billion-10.03
Antero Midstream logo
AM
Antero Midstream
1.3$8.82-2.8%$4.21 billion$792.59 million-12.60Analyst Report
Gap Down
ETRN
Equitrans Midstream
1.9$7.23-3.6%$3.13 billion$1.63 billion-22.59Earnings Announcement
Gap Down
Enable Midstream Partners logo
ENBL
Enable Midstream Partners
1.7$6.62-3.8%$2.88 billion$2.96 billion-60.18Earnings Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
High Trading Volume
Gap Down
TC PipeLines logo
TCP
TC PipeLines
2.3$29.12-2.7%$2.08 billion$403 million7.58Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Gap Down
EnLink Midstream logo
ENLC
EnLink Midstream
1.0$3.85-9.6%$1.89 billion$6.05 billion-1.56Gap Down
Rattler Midstream logo
RTLR
Rattler Midstream
1.8$11.00-1.1%$1.67 billion$447.67 million13.75Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
News Coverage
Archrock logo
AROC
Archrock
1.4$10.31-0.0%$1.58 billion$965.48 million-54.26Earnings Announcement
USA Compression Partners logo
USAC
USA Compression Partners
1.3$13.98-4.0%$1.36 billion$698.36 million-2.13News Coverage
Gap Down
ALTM
Altus Midstream
1.2$52.94-5.8%$860.06 million$135.80 million-0.53News Coverage
Gap Down
Transportadora de Gas del Sur logo
TGS
Transportadora de Gas del Sur
0.8$4.70-2.8%$719.15 million$819.04 million4.52Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
This page was last updated on 2/28/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.