S&P 500   3,870.29
DOW   31,391.52
QQQ   318.40
pixel
S&P 500   3,870.29
DOW   31,391.52
QQQ   318.40
pixel
S&P 500   3,870.29
DOW   31,391.52
QQQ   318.40
pixel
S&P 500   3,870.29
DOW   31,391.52
QQQ   318.40
pixel
Log in
OTCMKTS:AMNL

Applied Minerals Competitors

$0.05
0.00 (0.00 %)
(As of 03/2/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$0.04
Now: $0.05
$0.05
50-Day Range
$0.02
MA: $0.05
$0.10
52-Week Range
$0.00
Now: $0.05
$0.14
Volume8.10 million shs
Average Volume2.51 million shs
Market Capitalization$9.19 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta0.97

Competitors

Applied Minerals (OTCMKTS:AMNL) Vs. VMC, MLM, SQM, TECK, MDU, and LYSDY

Should you be buying AMNL stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "mining & quarrying of nonmetallic minerals, except fuels" are considered alternatives and competitors to Applied Minerals, including Vulcan Materials (VMC), Martin Marietta Materials (MLM), Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile (SQM), Teck Resources (TECK), MDU Resources Group (MDU), and Lynas Rare Earths (LYSDY).

Vulcan Materials (NYSE:VMC) and Applied Minerals (OTCMKTS:AMNL) are both construction companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Volatility and Risk

Vulcan Materials has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Applied Minerals has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Vulcan Materials and Applied Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Vulcan Materials12.55%10.97%5.67%
Applied Minerals-649.28%N/A-270.20%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Vulcan Materials and Applied Minerals' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vulcan Materials$4.93 billion4.54$617.66 million$4.7035.94
Applied Minerals$490,000.0018.76$-5,970,000.00N/AN/A

Vulcan Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Minerals.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Vulcan Materials and Applied Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Vulcan Materials014702.33
Applied Minerals0000N/A

Vulcan Materials currently has a consensus target price of $142.4762, indicating a potential downside of 15.66%. Given Vulcan Materials' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Vulcan Materials is more favorable than Applied Minerals.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

89.8% of Vulcan Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.3% of Applied Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Vulcan Materials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.2% of Applied Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Vulcan Materials beats Applied Minerals on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Martin Marietta Materials (NYSE:MLM) and Applied Minerals (OTCMKTS:AMNL) are both construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Risk and Volatility

Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Applied Minerals has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Martin Marietta Materials and Applied Minerals, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Martin Marietta Materials0111002.48
Applied Minerals0000N/A

Martin Marietta Materials currently has a consensus target price of $270.0909, suggesting a potential downside of 19.76%. Given Martin Marietta Materials' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Martin Marietta Materials is more favorable than Applied Minerals.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.8% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.3% of Applied Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.2% of Applied Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Martin Marietta Materials and Applied Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Martin Marietta Materials14.38%12.22%6.48%
Applied Minerals-649.28%N/A-270.20%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Martin Marietta Materials and Applied Minerals' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Martin Marietta Materials$4.74 billion4.42$611.90 million$9.7434.56
Applied Minerals$490,000.0018.76$-5,970,000.00N/AN/A

Martin Marietta Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Minerals.

Summary

Martin Marietta Materials beats Applied Minerals on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Applied Minerals (OTCMKTS:AMNL) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile (NYSE:SQM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Volatility and Risk

Applied Minerals has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Applied Minerals and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Applied Minerals$490,000.0018.76$-5,970,000.00N/AN/A
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile$1.94 billion7.59$278.11 million$1.0652.90

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Minerals.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Applied Minerals and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Applied Minerals0000N/A
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile20402.33

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile has a consensus target price of $53.50, suggesting a potential downside of 4.58%. Given Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile is more favorable than Applied Minerals.

Profitability

This table compares Applied Minerals and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Applied Minerals-649.28%N/A-270.20%
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile9.26%9.93%4.36%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

2.3% of Applied Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.8% of Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile shares are held by institutional investors. 16.2% of Applied Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile beats Applied Minerals on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Teck Resources (NYSE:TECK) and Applied Minerals (OTCMKTS:AMNL) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Teck Resources has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Applied Minerals has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Teck Resources and Applied Minerals' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Teck Resources$8.99 billion1.24$-455,930,000.00$2.229.56
Applied Minerals$490,000.0018.76$-5,970,000.00N/AN/A

Applied Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Teck Resources.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Teck Resources and Applied Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Teck Resources081002.56
Applied Minerals0000N/A

Teck Resources presently has a consensus price target of $23.5938, suggesting a potential upside of 11.13%. Given Teck Resources' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Teck Resources is more favorable than Applied Minerals.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

47.1% of Teck Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.3% of Applied Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 16.2% of Applied Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Teck Resources and Applied Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Teck Resources-14.37%2.49%1.38%
Applied Minerals-649.28%N/A-270.20%

Summary

Teck Resources beats Applied Minerals on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

MDU Resources Group (NYSE:MDU) and Applied Minerals (OTCMKTS:AMNL) are both utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

67.4% of MDU Resources Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.3% of Applied Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of MDU Resources Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.2% of Applied Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for MDU Resources Group and Applied Minerals, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
MDU Resources Group02002.00
Applied Minerals0000N/A

MDU Resources Group presently has a consensus target price of $24.50, suggesting a potential downside of 14.04%. Given MDU Resources Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe MDU Resources Group is more favorable than Applied Minerals.

Profitability

This table compares MDU Resources Group and Applied Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
MDU Resources Group6.75%12.87%4.73%
Applied Minerals-649.28%N/A-270.20%

Volatility and Risk

MDU Resources Group has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Applied Minerals has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares MDU Resources Group and Applied Minerals' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MDU Resources Group$5.34 billion1.07$335.45 million$1.6916.86
Applied Minerals$490,000.0018.76$-5,970,000.00N/AN/A

MDU Resources Group has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Minerals.

Summary

MDU Resources Group beats Applied Minerals on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Applied Minerals (OTCMKTS:AMNL) and Lynas Rare Earths (OTCMKTS:LYSDY) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Applied Minerals and Lynas Rare Earths' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Applied Minerals$490,000.0018.76$-5,970,000.00N/AN/A
Lynas Rare Earths$278.42 million16.02$-13,020,000.00N/AN/A

Applied Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lynas Rare Earths.

Profitability

This table compares Applied Minerals and Lynas Rare Earths' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Applied Minerals-649.28%N/A-270.20%
Lynas Rare EarthsN/AN/AN/A

Risk and Volatility

Applied Minerals has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lynas Rare Earths has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its share price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

2.3% of Applied Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.2% of Applied Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Applied Minerals and Lynas Rare Earths, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Applied Minerals0000N/A
Lynas Rare Earths0000N/A


Applied Minerals Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Vulcan Materials logo
VMC
Vulcan Materials
1.8$168.94flat$22.39 billion$4.93 billion36.81Analyst Report
Martin Marietta Materials logo
MLM
Martin Marietta Materials
1.9$336.59flat$20.97 billion$4.74 billion31.46Analyst Report
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile logo
SQM
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile
1.4$56.07flat$14.76 billion$1.94 billion90.44Decrease in Short Interest
Teck Resources logo
TECK
Teck Resources
2.1$21.23flat$11.11 billion$8.99 billion-11.93Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
MDU Resources Group logo
MDU
MDU Resources Group
1.9$28.50flat$5.71 billion$5.34 billion15.32
LYSDY
Lynas Rare Earths
0.6$4.95flat$4.46 billion$278.42 million0.00Increase in Short Interest
Gap Down
Hecla Mining logo
HL
Hecla Mining
1.4$6.11flat$3.27 billion$673.27 million-122.20
Summit Materials logo
SUM
Summit Materials
1.6$27.51flat$3.14 billion$2.22 billion22.93Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Compass Minerals International logo
CMP
Compass Minerals International
1.7$64.23flat$2.18 billion$1.49 billion26.76Dividend Announcement
News Coverage
Piedmont Lithium logo
PLL
Piedmont Lithium
0.7$80.78flat$1.13 billionN/A-118.79Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
U.S. Silica logo
SLCA
U.S. Silica
1.2$13.50flat$998.33 million$1.47 billion-2.41Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Energy Fuels logo
UUUU
Energy Fuels
1.0$6.19flat$831.52 million$5.86 million-19.97High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Down
United States Lime & Minerals logo
USLM
United States Lime & Minerals
1.0$143.60flat$808.61 million$158.28 million31.22High Trading Volume
Intrepid Potash logo
IPI
Intrepid Potash
0.8$31.25flat$415.44 million$220.07 million-16.62Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Gap Down
Centrus Energy logo
LEU
Centrus Energy
1.1$24.52flat$295.22 million$209.70 million8.70Insider Selling
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Galiano Gold logo
GAU
Galiano Gold
1.2N/AN/A$260.11 million$161.92 million6.44Upcoming Earnings
Ciner Resources logo
CINR
Ciner Resources
0.9$12.89flat$254.77 million$522.80 million15.53Upcoming Earnings
Increase in Short Interest
Gold Standard Ventures logo
GSV
Gold Standard Ventures
1.2$0.64flat$229.29 millionN/A-16.04Gap Down
ZEN Graphene Solutions logo
ZENYF
ZEN Graphene Solutions
0.4$2.39flat$205.60 millionN/A-239.00Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Smart Sand logo
SND
Smart Sand
1.2$3.66flat$159.64 million$233.07 million3.36Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Gap Up
JETMF
Global Crossing Airlines Group
0.5$1.99flat$57.59 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
SMPR
Standard Metals Processing
0.5$0.07flat$8.69 millionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
SLSDF
Select Sands
0.8$0.05flat$4.22 million$4.36 million-0.60Increase in Short Interest
Gap Up
EMESQ
Emerge Energy Services
0.0$0.01flat$0.00$313.59 million0.00Gap Down
This page was last updated on 3/3/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.