Applied Minerals Competitors

Vulcan Materials (NYSE:VMC) and Applied Minerals (OTCMKTS:AMNL) are both construction companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Volatility and Risk

Vulcan Materials has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Applied Minerals has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Vulcan Materials and Applied Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Vulcan Materials and Applied Minerals' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Vulcan Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Minerals.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Vulcan Materials and Applied Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.

Vulcan Materials currently has a consensus target price of $142.4762, indicating a potential downside of 15.66%. Given Vulcan Materials' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Vulcan Materials is more favorable than Applied Minerals.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

89.8% of Vulcan Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.3% of Applied Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Vulcan Materials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.2% of Applied Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Vulcan Materials beats Applied Minerals on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Martin Marietta Materials (NYSE:MLM) and Applied Minerals (OTCMKTS:AMNL) are both construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Risk and Volatility

Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Applied Minerals has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Martin Marietta Materials and Applied Minerals, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Martin Marietta Materials currently has a consensus target price of $270.0909, suggesting a potential downside of 19.76%. Given Martin Marietta Materials' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Martin Marietta Materials is more favorable than Applied Minerals.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.8% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.3% of Applied Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Martin Marietta Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.2% of Applied Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Martin Marietta Materials and Applied Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Martin Marietta Materials and Applied Minerals' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Martin Marietta Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Minerals.

Summary

Martin Marietta Materials beats Applied Minerals on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Applied Minerals (OTCMKTS:AMNL) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile (NYSE:SQM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Volatility and Risk

Applied Minerals has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Applied Minerals and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Minerals.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Applied Minerals and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile has a consensus target price of $53.50, suggesting a potential downside of 4.58%. Given Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile is more favorable than Applied Minerals.

Profitability

This table compares Applied Minerals and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

2.3% of Applied Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.8% of Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile shares are held by institutional investors. 16.2% of Applied Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile beats Applied Minerals on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Teck Resources (NYSE:TECK) and Applied Minerals (OTCMKTS:AMNL) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Teck Resources has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Applied Minerals has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Teck Resources and Applied Minerals' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Applied Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Teck Resources.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Teck Resources and Applied Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.

Teck Resources presently has a consensus price target of $23.5938, suggesting a potential upside of 11.13%. Given Teck Resources' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Teck Resources is more favorable than Applied Minerals.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

47.1% of Teck Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.3% of Applied Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 16.2% of Applied Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Teck Resources and Applied Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Teck Resources beats Applied Minerals on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

MDU Resources Group (NYSE:MDU) and Applied Minerals (OTCMKTS:AMNL) are both utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

67.4% of MDU Resources Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.3% of Applied Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of MDU Resources Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.2% of Applied Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for MDU Resources Group and Applied Minerals, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

MDU Resources Group presently has a consensus target price of $24.50, suggesting a potential downside of 14.04%. Given MDU Resources Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe MDU Resources Group is more favorable than Applied Minerals.

Profitability

This table compares MDU Resources Group and Applied Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

MDU Resources Group has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Applied Minerals has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares MDU Resources Group and Applied Minerals' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

MDU Resources Group has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Minerals.

Summary

MDU Resources Group beats Applied Minerals on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Applied Minerals (OTCMKTS:AMNL) and Lynas Rare Earths (OTCMKTS:LYSDY) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Applied Minerals and Lynas Rare Earths' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Applied Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lynas Rare Earths.

Profitability

This table compares Applied Minerals and Lynas Rare Earths' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Applied Minerals has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lynas Rare Earths has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its share price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

2.3% of Applied Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.2% of Applied Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Applied Minerals and Lynas Rare Earths, as reported by MarketBeat.