Ampal American Israel Competitors

Ampal American Israel (OTCMKTS:AMPLQ) and Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Ampal American Israel and Ares Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Ampal American Israel and Ares Capital, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Ares Capital has a consensus price target of $17.50, suggesting a potential downside of 9.56%. Given Ares Capital's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ares Capital is more favorable than Ampal American Israel.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Ampal American Israel and Ares Capital's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Ampal American Israel.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

31.3% of Ares Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 63.4% of Ampal American Israel shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Ares Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

Ampal American Israel has a beta of -10.74, meaning that its stock price is 1,174% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ares Capital has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Ares Capital beats Ampal American Israel on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Prospect Capital (NASDAQ:PSEC) and Ampal American Israel (OTCMKTS:AMPLQ) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Prospect Capital and Ampal American Israel's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Prospect Capital and Ampal American Israel, as provided by MarketBeat.

Prospect Capital presently has a consensus price target of $4.50, suggesting a potential downside of 43.75%. Given Prospect Capital's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Prospect Capital is more favorable than Ampal American Israel.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Prospect Capital and Ampal American Israel's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Ampal American Israel has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Prospect Capital.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

10.3% of Prospect Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 26.8% of Prospect Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 63.4% of Ampal American Israel shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Prospect Capital has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ampal American Israel has a beta of -10.74, meaning that its share price is 1,174% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Prospect Capital beats Ampal American Israel on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Golub Capital BDC (NASDAQ:GBDC) and Ampal American Israel (OTCMKTS:AMPLQ) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Golub Capital BDC and Ampal American Israel, as provided by MarketBeat.

Golub Capital BDC presently has a consensus price target of $11.50, suggesting a potential downside of 25.23%. Given Golub Capital BDC's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Golub Capital BDC is more favorable than Ampal American Israel.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

36.9% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 63.4% of Ampal American Israel shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ampal American Israel has a beta of -10.74, meaning that its share price is 1,174% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Golub Capital BDC and Ampal American Israel's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Golub Capital BDC and Ampal American Israel's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Golub Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Ampal American Israel.

Summary

Golub Capital BDC beats Ampal American Israel on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ampal American Israel (OTCMKTS:AMPLQ) and Fairfax India (OTCMKTS:FFXDF) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Ampal American Israel and Fairfax India, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Given Fairfax India's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fairfax India is more favorable than Ampal American Israel.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.1% of Fairfax India shares are owned by institutional investors. 63.4% of Ampal American Israel shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Ampal American Israel has a beta of -10.74, indicating that its share price is 1,174% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fairfax India has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Ampal American Israel and Fairfax India's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Ampal American Israel and Fairfax India's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Fairfax India has higher revenue and earnings than Ampal American Israel.

Summary

Fairfax India beats Ampal American Israel on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ampal American Israel (OTCMKTS:AMPLQ) and Sixth Street Specialty Lending (NYSE:TSLX) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Ampal American Israel and Sixth Street Specialty Lending, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a consensus target price of $18.1429, suggesting a potential downside of 18.31%. Given Sixth Street Specialty Lending's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sixth Street Specialty Lending is more favorable than Ampal American Israel.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

55.7% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. 63.4% of Ampal American Israel shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Ampal American Israel has a beta of -10.74, indicating that its share price is 1,174% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.16, indicating that its share price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Ampal American Israel and Sixth Street Specialty Lending's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Ampal American Israel and Sixth Street Specialty Lending's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than Ampal American Israel.

Summary

Sixth Street Specialty Lending beats Ampal American Israel on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ampal American Israel (OTCMKTS:AMPLQ) and New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Ampal American Israel and New Mountain Finance, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

New Mountain Finance has a consensus target price of $11.1667, suggesting a potential downside of 13.57%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Ampal American Israel.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

34.5% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 63.4% of Ampal American Israel shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Ampal American Israel has a beta of -10.74, indicating that its share price is 1,174% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, New Mountain Finance has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Ampal American Israel and New Mountain Finance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Ampal American Israel and New Mountain Finance's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

New Mountain Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Ampal American Israel.

Summary

New Mountain Finance beats Ampal American Israel on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.