Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Competitors

HDFC Bank (NYSE:HDB) and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (OTCMKTS:ANZBY) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for HDFC Bank and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares HDFC Bank and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Australia and New Zealand Banking Group has higher revenue and earnings than HDFC Bank. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HDFC Bank, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares HDFC Bank and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

17.8% of HDFC Bank shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of HDFC Bank shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Australia and New Zealand Banking Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

HDFC Bank has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its share price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Australia and New Zealand Banking Group has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its share price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

HDFC Bank beats Australia and New Zealand Banking Group on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Royal Bank of Canada (NYSE:RY) and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (OTCMKTS:ANZBY) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Royal Bank of Canada and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

Royal Bank of Canada presently has a consensus target price of $113.8275, indicating a potential upside of 31.06%. Given Royal Bank of Canada's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Royal Bank of Canada is more favorable than Australia and New Zealand Banking Group.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Royal Bank of Canada and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Royal Bank of Canada has higher revenue and earnings than Australia and New Zealand Banking Group. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Royal Bank of Canada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Royal Bank of Canada and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Royal Bank of Canada pays an annual dividend of $3.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group pays an annual dividend of $0.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Royal Bank of Canada pays out 57.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group pays out 25.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Royal Bank of Canada has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Royal Bank of Canada is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

40.8% of Royal Bank of Canada shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Australia and New Zealand Banking Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Royal Bank of Canada has a beta of 0.99, meaning that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Australia and New Zealand Banking Group has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Royal Bank of Canada beats Australia and New Zealand Banking Group on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia (OTCMKTS:CMWAY) and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (OTCMKTS:ANZBY) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.1% of Commonwealth Bank of Australia shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Australia and New Zealand Banking Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Commonwealth Bank of Australia pays an annual dividend of $2.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group pays an annual dividend of $0.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Commonwealth Bank of Australia pays out 85.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group pays out 25.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Commonwealth Bank of Australia and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Australia and New Zealand Banking Group. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Commonwealth Bank of Australia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Commonwealth Bank of Australia and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

Profitability

This table compares Commonwealth Bank of Australia and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Australia and New Zealand Banking Group has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Commonwealth Bank of Australia beats Australia and New Zealand Banking Group on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Toronto-Dominion Bank (NYSE:TD) and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (OTCMKTS:ANZBY) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and earnings.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

48.0% of The Toronto-Dominion Bank shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Australia and New Zealand Banking Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

The Toronto-Dominion Bank pays an annual dividend of $2.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group pays an annual dividend of $0.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. The Toronto-Dominion Bank pays out 62.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group pays out 25.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Toronto-Dominion Bank has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. The Toronto-Dominion Bank is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares The Toronto-Dominion Bank and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

The Toronto-Dominion Bank has higher revenue and earnings than Australia and New Zealand Banking Group. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Toronto-Dominion Bank, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for The Toronto-Dominion Bank and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

The Toronto-Dominion Bank presently has a consensus target price of $75.25, indicating a potential upside of 21.04%. Given The Toronto-Dominion Bank's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe The Toronto-Dominion Bank is more favorable than Australia and New Zealand Banking Group.

Profitability

This table compares The Toronto-Dominion Bank and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

The Toronto-Dominion Bank has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Australia and New Zealand Banking Group has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

The Toronto-Dominion Bank beats Australia and New Zealand Banking Group on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

BNP Paribas (OTCMKTS:BNPQY) and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (OTCMKTS:ANZBY) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and earnings.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

1.1% of BNP Paribas shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Australia and New Zealand Banking Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares BNP Paribas and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

BNP Paribas has higher revenue and earnings than Australia and New Zealand Banking Group. BNP Paribas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Australia and New Zealand Banking Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for BNP Paribas and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Profitability

This table compares BNP Paribas and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

BNP Paribas has a beta of 1.7, suggesting that its stock price is 70% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Australia and New Zealand Banking Group has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

BNP Paribas beats Australia and New Zealand Banking Group on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (NYSE:MUFG) and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (OTCMKTS:ANZBY) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and earnings.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has higher revenue and earnings than Australia and New Zealand Banking Group. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Australia and New Zealand Banking Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group pays an annual dividend of $0.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays out 29.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group pays out 25.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Risk & Volatility

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Australia and New Zealand Banking Group has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

1.2% of Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Australia and New Zealand Banking Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and Australia and New Zealand Banking Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Summary

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group beats Australia and New Zealand Banking Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.