Asia Global Crossing Competitors

Verizon Communications (NYSE:VZ) and Asia Global Crossing (OTCMKTS:ASGXF) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Verizon Communications and Asia Global Crossing, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Verizon Communications presently has a consensus price target of $61.8421, indicating a potential upside of 11.83%. Given Verizon Communications' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Verizon Communications is more favorable than Asia Global Crossing.

Risk & Volatility

Verizon Communications has a beta of 0.44, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Asia Global Crossing has a beta of 2.89, meaning that its share price is 189% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Verizon Communications and Asia Global Crossing's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Verizon Communications and Asia Global Crossing's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Verizon Communications has higher revenue and earnings than Asia Global Crossing.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

64.9% of Verizon Communications shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Verizon Communications shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 90.7% of Asia Global Crossing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Verizon Communications beats Asia Global Crossing on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

AT&T (NYSE:T) and Asia Global Crossing (OTCMKTS:ASGXF) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for AT&T and Asia Global Crossing, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

AT&T presently has a consensus price target of $32.0833, indicating a potential upside of 15.04%. Given AT&T's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe AT&T is more favorable than Asia Global Crossing.

Risk & Volatility

AT&T has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Asia Global Crossing has a beta of 2.89, meaning that its share price is 189% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares AT&T and Asia Global Crossing's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares AT&T and Asia Global Crossing's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

AT&T has higher revenue and earnings than Asia Global Crossing.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

51.2% of AT&T shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of AT&T shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 90.7% of Asia Global Crossing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

AT&T beats Asia Global Crossing on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

SoftBank Group (OTCMKTS:SFTBY) and Asia Global Crossing (OTCMKTS:ASGXF) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability and dividends.

Risk & Volatility

SoftBank Group has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its share price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Asia Global Crossing has a beta of 2.89, meaning that its share price is 189% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for SoftBank Group and Asia Global Crossing, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares SoftBank Group and Asia Global Crossing's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Asia Global Crossing has lower revenue, but higher earnings than SoftBank Group.

Profitability

This table compares SoftBank Group and Asia Global Crossing's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.1% of SoftBank Group shares are held by institutional investors. 90.7% of Asia Global Crossing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Asia Global Crossing beats SoftBank Group on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

China Mobile (NYSE:CHL) and Asia Global Crossing (OTCMKTS:ASGXF) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and profitability.

Volatility & Risk

China Mobile has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its share price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Asia Global Crossing has a beta of 2.89, meaning that its share price is 189% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for China Mobile and Asia Global Crossing, as provided by MarketBeat.

China Mobile presently has a consensus price target of $49.00, indicating a potential upside of 78.12%. Given China Mobile's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe China Mobile is more favorable than Asia Global Crossing.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares China Mobile and Asia Global Crossing's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

China Mobile has higher revenue and earnings than Asia Global Crossing.

Profitability

This table compares China Mobile and Asia Global Crossing's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

1.9% of China Mobile shares are held by institutional investors. 90.7% of Asia Global Crossing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

China Mobile beats Asia Global Crossing on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nippon Telegraph and Telephone (OTCMKTS:NTTYY) and Asia Global Crossing (OTCMKTS:ASGXF) are both utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and profitability.

Volatility & Risk

Nippon Telegraph and Telephone has a beta of 0.19, meaning that its share price is 81% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Asia Global Crossing has a beta of 2.89, meaning that its share price is 189% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Nippon Telegraph and Telephone and Asia Global Crossing, as provided by MarketBeat.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Nippon Telegraph and Telephone and Asia Global Crossing's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Nippon Telegraph and Telephone has higher revenue and earnings than Asia Global Crossing.

Profitability

This table compares Nippon Telegraph and Telephone and Asia Global Crossing's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.2% of Nippon Telegraph and Telephone shares are held by institutional investors. 90.7% of Asia Global Crossing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Nippon Telegraph and Telephone beats Asia Global Crossing on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

América Móvil (NYSE:AMX) and Asia Global Crossing (OTCMKTS:ASGXF) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and profitability.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

7.4% of América Móvil shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of América Móvil shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 90.7% of Asia Global Crossing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares América Móvil and Asia Global Crossing's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

América Móvil has higher revenue and earnings than Asia Global Crossing.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for América Móvil and Asia Global Crossing, as provided by MarketBeat.

América Móvil presently has a consensus price target of $12.1667, indicating a potential downside of 4.20%. Given América Móvil's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe América Móvil is more favorable than Asia Global Crossing.

Profitability

This table compares América Móvil and Asia Global Crossing's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

América Móvil has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Asia Global Crossing has a beta of 2.89, meaning that its share price is 189% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

América Móvil beats Asia Global Crossing on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.