ChinaCache International Competitors

Fiserv (NASDAQ:FISV) and ChinaCache International (OTCMKTS:CCIHY) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Fiserv and ChinaCache International, as provided by MarketBeat.

Fiserv presently has a consensus price target of $129.7188, indicating a potential upside of 3.34%. Given Fiserv's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Fiserv is more favorable than ChinaCache International.

Profitability

This table compares Fiserv and ChinaCache International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

91.7% of Fiserv shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Fiserv shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.7% of ChinaCache International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Fiserv and ChinaCache International's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Fiserv has higher revenue and earnings than ChinaCache International.

Summary

Fiserv beats ChinaCache International on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Automatic Data Processing (NASDAQ:ADP) and ChinaCache International (OTCMKTS:CCIHY) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Automatic Data Processing and ChinaCache International, as provided by MarketBeat.

Automatic Data Processing presently has a consensus price target of $169.9375, indicating a potential downside of 11.44%. Given Automatic Data Processing's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Automatic Data Processing is more favorable than ChinaCache International.

Profitability

This table compares Automatic Data Processing and ChinaCache International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

79.7% of Automatic Data Processing shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Automatic Data Processing shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.7% of ChinaCache International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Automatic Data Processing and ChinaCache International's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Automatic Data Processing has higher revenue and earnings than ChinaCache International.

Summary

Automatic Data Processing beats ChinaCache International on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Workday (NASDAQ:WDAY) and ChinaCache International (OTCMKTS:CCIHY) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

68.0% of Workday shares are held by institutional investors. 26.5% of Workday shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.7% of ChinaCache International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Workday and ChinaCache International, as provided by MarketBeat.

Workday presently has a consensus price target of $263.2222, indicating a potential upside of 1.13%. Given Workday's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Workday is more favorable than ChinaCache International.

Profitability

This table compares Workday and ChinaCache International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Workday and ChinaCache International's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

ChinaCache International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Workday.

Summary

Workday beats ChinaCache International on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Bilibili (NASDAQ:BILI) and ChinaCache International (OTCMKTS:CCIHY) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

39.1% of Bilibili shares are held by institutional investors. 13.7% of ChinaCache International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Bilibili and ChinaCache International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Bilibili currently has a consensus price target of $66.0455, indicating a potential downside of 35.88%. Given Bilibili's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Bilibili is more favorable than ChinaCache International.

Profitability

This table compares Bilibili and ChinaCache International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Bilibili and ChinaCache International's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

ChinaCache International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Bilibili.

Verisk Analytics (NASDAQ:VRSK) and ChinaCache International (OTCMKTS:CCIHY) are both business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

88.2% of Verisk Analytics shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Verisk Analytics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.7% of ChinaCache International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Verisk Analytics and ChinaCache International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Verisk Analytics currently has a consensus price target of $195.4545, indicating a potential upside of 5.94%. Given Verisk Analytics' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Verisk Analytics is more favorable than ChinaCache International.

Profitability

This table compares Verisk Analytics and ChinaCache International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Verisk Analytics and ChinaCache International's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Verisk Analytics has higher revenue and earnings than ChinaCache International.

Summary

Verisk Analytics beats ChinaCache International on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

RingCentral (NYSE:RNG) and ChinaCache International (OTCMKTS:CCIHY) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

86.3% of RingCentral shares are held by institutional investors. 11.0% of RingCentral shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.7% of ChinaCache International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares RingCentral and ChinaCache International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares RingCentral and ChinaCache International's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

ChinaCache International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than RingCentral.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for RingCentral and ChinaCache International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

RingCentral currently has a consensus price target of $431.7727, indicating a potential upside of 31.23%. Given RingCentral's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe RingCentral is more favorable than ChinaCache International.

Summary

RingCentral beats ChinaCache International on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.