Enzyme Environmental Solutions Competitors

Enzyme Environmental Solutions (OTCMKTS:EESO) and McDonald's (NYSE:MCD) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

66.3% of McDonald's shares are owned by institutional investors. 37.5% of Enzyme Environmental Solutions shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of McDonald's shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Enzyme Environmental Solutions has a beta of 0.07, indicating that its share price is 93% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, McDonald's has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Enzyme Environmental Solutions and McDonald's' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

McDonald's has higher revenue and earnings than Enzyme Environmental Solutions.

Profitability

This table compares Enzyme Environmental Solutions and McDonald's' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Enzyme Environmental Solutions and McDonald's, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

McDonald's has a consensus price target of $243.2069, suggesting a potential upside of 3.56%. Given McDonald's' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe McDonald's is more favorable than Enzyme Environmental Solutions.

Summary

McDonald's beats Enzyme Environmental Solutions on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Chipotle Mexican Grill (NYSE:CMG) and Enzyme Environmental Solutions (OTCMKTS:EESO) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

90.0% of Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of Enzyme Environmental Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Chipotle Mexican Grill has a beta of 1.31, suggesting that its share price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Enzyme Environmental Solutions has a beta of 0.07, suggesting that its share price is 93% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Chipotle Mexican Grill and Enzyme Environmental Solutions' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Chipotle Mexican Grill has higher revenue and earnings than Enzyme Environmental Solutions.

Profitability

This table compares Chipotle Mexican Grill and Enzyme Environmental Solutions' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Chipotle Mexican Grill and Enzyme Environmental Solutions, as reported by MarketBeat.

Chipotle Mexican Grill currently has a consensus price target of $1,655.2903, suggesting a potential upside of 16.08%. Given Chipotle Mexican Grill's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Chipotle Mexican Grill is more favorable than Enzyme Environmental Solutions.

Summary

Chipotle Mexican Grill beats Enzyme Environmental Solutions on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Yum! Brands (NYSE:YUM) and Enzyme Environmental Solutions (OTCMKTS:EESO) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

75.2% of Yum! Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Yum! Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of Enzyme Environmental Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Yum! Brands has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Enzyme Environmental Solutions has a beta of 0.07, suggesting that its share price is 93% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Yum! Brands and Enzyme Environmental Solutions' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Yum! Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Enzyme Environmental Solutions.

Profitability

This table compares Yum! Brands and Enzyme Environmental Solutions' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Yum! Brands and Enzyme Environmental Solutions, as reported by MarketBeat.

Yum! Brands currently has a consensus price target of $118.50, suggesting a potential downside of 2.25%. Given Yum! Brands' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Yum! Brands is more favorable than Enzyme Environmental Solutions.

Summary

Yum! Brands beats Enzyme Environmental Solutions on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) and Enzyme Environmental Solutions (OTCMKTS:EESO) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

81.6% of Yum China shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Yum China shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of Enzyme Environmental Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Yum China has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its share price is 13% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Enzyme Environmental Solutions has a beta of 0.07, suggesting that its share price is 93% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Yum China and Enzyme Environmental Solutions' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Yum China has higher revenue and earnings than Enzyme Environmental Solutions.

Profitability

This table compares Yum China and Enzyme Environmental Solutions' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Yum China and Enzyme Environmental Solutions, as reported by MarketBeat.

Yum China currently has a consensus price target of $81.6750, suggesting a potential upside of 31.50%. Given Yum China's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Yum China is more favorable than Enzyme Environmental Solutions.

Summary

Yum China beats Enzyme Environmental Solutions on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Enzyme Environmental Solutions (OTCMKTS:EESO) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Restaurant Brands International and Enzyme Environmental Solutions, as reported by MarketBeat.

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus price target of $70.5789, suggesting a potential upside of 1.58%. Given Restaurant Brands International's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Enzyme Environmental Solutions.

Volatility & Risk

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Enzyme Environmental Solutions has a beta of 0.07, suggesting that its share price is 93% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Enzyme Environmental Solutions' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than Enzyme Environmental Solutions.

Profitability

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Enzyme Environmental Solutions' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

79.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 37.5% of Enzyme Environmental Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Enzyme Environmental Solutions on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Enzyme Environmental Solutions (OTCMKTS:EESO) and Darden Restaurants (NYSE:DRI) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, dividends and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Enzyme Environmental Solutions and Darden Restaurants, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $141.9667, suggesting a potential downside of 0.29%. Given Darden Restaurants' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Darden Restaurants is more favorable than Enzyme Environmental Solutions.

Risk and Volatility

Enzyme Environmental Solutions has a beta of 0.07, suggesting that its stock price is 93% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Enzyme Environmental Solutions and Darden Restaurants' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Enzyme Environmental Solutions has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Darden Restaurants.

Profitability

This table compares Enzyme Environmental Solutions and Darden Restaurants' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

89.4% of Darden Restaurants shares are held by institutional investors. 37.5% of Enzyme Environmental Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Darden Restaurants shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Darden Restaurants beats Enzyme Environmental Solutions on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.