AU Min Africa PTY Competitors

AU Min Africa PTY (OTCMKTS:GRYEF) and Waste Management (NYSE:WM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk and profitability.

Volatility & Risk

AU Min Africa PTY has a beta of 0.18, indicating that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Waste Management has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares AU Min Africa PTY and Waste Management's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Waste Management has higher revenue and earnings than AU Min Africa PTY.

Profitability

This table compares AU Min Africa PTY and Waste Management's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

71.4% of Waste Management shares are held by institutional investors. 23.9% of AU Min Africa PTY shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Waste Management shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for AU Min Africa PTY and Waste Management, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Waste Management has a consensus price target of $129.7692, indicating a potential downside of 8.41%. Given Waste Management's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Waste Management is more favorable than AU Min Africa PTY.

Summary

Waste Management beats AU Min Africa PTY on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

AU Min Africa PTY (OTCMKTS:GRYEF) and Republic Services (NYSE:RSG) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Risk & Volatility

AU Min Africa PTY has a beta of 0.18, meaning that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Republic Services has a beta of 0.64, meaning that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares AU Min Africa PTY and Republic Services' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Republic Services has higher revenue and earnings than AU Min Africa PTY.

Profitability

This table compares AU Min Africa PTY and Republic Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

56.8% of Republic Services shares are held by institutional investors. 23.9% of AU Min Africa PTY shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Republic Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for AU Min Africa PTY and Republic Services, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Republic Services has a consensus target price of $103.50, indicating a potential downside of 5.30%. Given Republic Services' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Republic Services is more favorable than AU Min Africa PTY.

Summary

Republic Services beats AU Min Africa PTY on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

AU Min Africa PTY (OTCMKTS:GRYEF) and Waste Connections (NYSE:WCN) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Risk & Volatility

AU Min Africa PTY has a beta of 0.18, meaning that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Waste Connections has a beta of 0.44, meaning that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares AU Min Africa PTY and Waste Connections' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Waste Connections has higher revenue and earnings than AU Min Africa PTY.

Profitability

This table compares AU Min Africa PTY and Waste Connections' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

80.8% of Waste Connections shares are held by institutional investors. 23.9% of AU Min Africa PTY shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Waste Connections shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for AU Min Africa PTY and Waste Connections, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Waste Connections has a consensus target price of $120.1667, indicating a potential downside of 2.53%. Given Waste Connections' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Waste Connections is more favorable than AU Min Africa PTY.

Summary

Waste Connections beats AU Min Africa PTY on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

AU Min Africa PTY (OTCMKTS:GRYEF) and Veolia Environnement (OTCMKTS:VEOEY) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Volatility & Risk

AU Min Africa PTY has a beta of 0.18, indicating that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Veolia Environnement has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares AU Min Africa PTY and Veolia Environnement's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Veolia Environnement has higher revenue and earnings than AU Min Africa PTY.

Profitability

This table compares AU Min Africa PTY and Veolia Environnement's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for AU Min Africa PTY and Veolia Environnement, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Summary

Veolia Environnement beats AU Min Africa PTY on 3 of the 3 factors compared between the two stocks.

AU Min Africa PTY (OTCMKTS:GRYEF) and Casella Waste Systems (NASDAQ:CWST) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Risk & Volatility

AU Min Africa PTY has a beta of 0.18, meaning that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Casella Waste Systems has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares AU Min Africa PTY and Casella Waste Systems' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Casella Waste Systems has higher revenue and earnings than AU Min Africa PTY.

Profitability

This table compares AU Min Africa PTY and Casella Waste Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

89.7% of Casella Waste Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 23.9% of AU Min Africa PTY shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.7% of Casella Waste Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for AU Min Africa PTY and Casella Waste Systems, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Casella Waste Systems has a consensus target price of $68.40, indicating a potential upside of 1.57%. Given Casella Waste Systems' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Casella Waste Systems is more favorable than AU Min Africa PTY.

Summary

Casella Waste Systems beats AU Min Africa PTY on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

NeXplore (OTCMKTS:NXPC) and AU Min Africa PTY (OTCMKTS:GRYEF) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for NeXplore and AU Min Africa PTY, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Volatility and Risk

NeXplore has a beta of 96.58, meaning that its share price is 9,558% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AU Min Africa PTY has a beta of 0.18, meaning that its share price is 82% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares NeXplore and AU Min Africa PTY's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares NeXplore and AU Min Africa PTY's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Summary

NeXplore beats AU Min Africa PTY on 1 of the 1 factors compared between the two stocks.