Metso Competitors

Amcor (NYSE:AMCR) and Metso (OTCMKTS:MXCYY) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation and risk.

Volatility and Risk

Amcor has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Metso has a beta of 1.79, indicating that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Amcor and Metso, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Amcor currently has a consensus target price of $12.40, suggesting a potential upside of 5.71%. Given Amcor's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Amcor is more favorable than Metso.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Amcor and Metso's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Amcor has higher revenue and earnings than Metso. Amcor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metso, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Amcor and Metso's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

35.0% of Amcor shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Metso shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Amcor shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Metso shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Amcor beats Metso on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

IDEX (NYSE:IEX) and Metso (OTCMKTS:MXCYY) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for IDEX and Metso, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

IDEX currently has a consensus target price of $191.00, suggesting a potential downside of 12.15%. Given IDEX's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe IDEX is more favorable than Metso.

Profitability

This table compares IDEX and Metso's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

IDEX has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Metso has a beta of 1.79, indicating that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

96.6% of IDEX shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Metso shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of IDEX shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Metso shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares IDEX and Metso's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

IDEX has higher revenue and earnings than Metso. IDEX is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metso, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

IDEX beats Metso on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Metso (OTCMKTS:MXCYY) and Avery Dennison (NYSE:AVY) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Metso and Avery Dennison, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Avery Dennison has a consensus target price of $176.70, suggesting a potential downside of 10.36%. Given Avery Dennison's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Avery Dennison is more favorable than Metso.

Profitability

This table compares Metso and Avery Dennison's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Metso has a beta of 1.79, suggesting that its share price is 79% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Avery Dennison has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.0% of Metso shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.0% of Avery Dennison shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Metso shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Avery Dennison shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Metso and Avery Dennison's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Metso has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Avery Dennison. Avery Dennison is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metso, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Avery Dennison beats Metso on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Metso (OTCMKTS:MXCYY) and Plug Power (NASDAQ:PLUG) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Metso and Plug Power, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Plug Power has a consensus target price of $52.1429, suggesting a potential upside of 61.43%. Given Plug Power's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Plug Power is more favorable than Metso.

Profitability

This table compares Metso and Plug Power's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Metso has a beta of 1.79, suggesting that its share price is 79% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Plug Power has a beta of 1.81, suggesting that its share price is 81% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.0% of Metso shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of Plug Power shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Metso shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Plug Power shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Metso and Plug Power's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Metso has higher revenue and earnings than Plug Power. Plug Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metso, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Metso (OTCMKTS:MXCYY) and Crown (NYSE:CCK) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Metso and Crown, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Crown has a consensus target price of $108.8333, suggesting a potential upside of 3.78%. Given Crown's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Crown is more favorable than Metso.

Profitability

This table compares Metso and Crown's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Metso has a beta of 1.79, suggesting that its share price is 79% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Crown has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.0% of Metso shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.9% of Crown shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Metso shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Crown shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Metso and Crown's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Crown has higher revenue and earnings than Metso. Crown is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metso, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Crown beats Metso on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Metso (OTCMKTS:MXCYY) and Fortune Brands Home & Security (NYSE:FBHS) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Metso and Fortune Brands Home & Security, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Fortune Brands Home & Security has a consensus target price of $88.1176, suggesting a potential downside of 12.49%. Given Fortune Brands Home & Security's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fortune Brands Home & Security is more favorable than Metso.

Profitability

This table compares Metso and Fortune Brands Home & Security's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Metso has a beta of 1.79, suggesting that its share price is 79% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Home & Security has a beta of 1.66, suggesting that its share price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.0% of Metso shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Metso shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Metso and Fortune Brands Home & Security's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Fortune Brands Home & Security has higher revenue and earnings than Metso. Fortune Brands Home & Security is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metso, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Fortune Brands Home & Security beats Metso on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.