OTCMKTS:SDCJF

Sundance Energy Australia Competitors

$0.15

+0.10 (+200.00 %)

(As of 05/4/2020)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$0.03

▼

$0.15

50-Day Range

$0.15

▼

$0.15

52-Week Range

$0.03

▼

$0.15

Volume1,200 shs

Average Volume82 shs

Market Capitalization$10.31 million

P/E RatioN/A

Dividend YieldN/A

Beta3.96

Sundance Energy Australia (OTCMKTS:SDCJF) Vs. OASPQ, INDO, CHKAQ, VKIN, TCFF, and CEI

Should you be buying SDCJF stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "crude petroleum & natural gas" are considered alternatives and competitors to Sundance Energy Australia, including Oasis Petroleum (OASPQ), Indonesia Energy (INDO), Chesapeake Energy (CHKAQ), Viking Energy Group (VKIN), Trillion Energy International (TCFF), and Camber Energy (CEI).

Sundance Energy Australia vs. Oasis Petroleum Stock

Oasis Petroleum (OTCMKTS:OASPQ) and Sundance Energy Australia (OTCMKTS:SDCJF) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

49.7% of Oasis Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Oasis Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Oasis Petroleum has a beta of 3.94, meaning that its share price is 294% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sundance Energy Australia has a beta of 3.96, meaning that its share price is 296% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Oasis Petroleum and Sundance Energy Australia's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Oasis Petroleum	-293.27%	-0.64%	-0.21%
Sundance Energy Australia	24.02%	13.45%	6.16%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Oasis Petroleum and Sundance Energy Australia, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Oasis Petroleum	0	0	0	0	N/A
Sundance Energy Australia	0	0	0	0	N/A

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Oasis Petroleum and Sundance Energy Australia's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Oasis Petroleum	$2.07 billion	0.02	$-128,240,000.00	$0.03	4.05
Sundance Energy Australia	$164.93 million	0.06	$-28,140,000.00	N/A	N/A

Sundance Energy Australia has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Oasis Petroleum.

Summary

Sundance Energy Australia beats Oasis Petroleum on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sundance Energy Australia vs. Indonesia Energy Stock

Sundance Energy Australia (OTCMKTS:SDCJF) and Indonesia Energy (NYSE:INDO) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Sundance Energy Australia and Indonesia Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sundance Energy Australia	24.02%	13.45%	6.16%
Indonesia Energy	N/A	N/A	N/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Sundance Energy Australia and Indonesia Energy's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sundance Energy Australia	$164.93 million	0.06	$-28,140,000.00	N/A	N/A
Indonesia Energy	$1.98 million	19.02	$-6,950,000.00	($0.94)	-5.39

Indonesia Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sundance Energy Australia.

Risk & Volatility

Sundance Energy Australia has a beta of 3.96, suggesting that its stock price is 296% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Indonesia Energy has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

1.1% of Indonesia Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Sundance Energy Australia and Indonesia Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sundance Energy Australia	0	0	0	0	N/A
Indonesia Energy	0	0	1	0	3.00

Indonesia Energy has a consensus target price of $8.00, indicating a potential upside of 57.79%. Given Indonesia Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Indonesia Energy is more favorable than Sundance Energy Australia.

Sundance Energy Australia vs. Chesapeake Energy Stock

Chesapeake Energy (OTCMKTS:CHKAQ) and Sundance Energy Australia (OTCMKTS:SDCJF) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Chesapeake Energy and Sundance Energy Australia's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chesapeake Energy	-162.46%	N/A	-3.45%
Sundance Energy Australia	24.02%	13.45%	6.16%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Chesapeake Energy and Sundance Energy Australia's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chesapeake Energy	$8.49 billion	0.00	$-308,000,000.00	($54.00)	-0.06
Sundance Energy Australia	$164.93 million	0.06	$-28,140,000.00	N/A	N/A

Sundance Energy Australia has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Chesapeake Energy.

Volatility and Risk

Chesapeake Energy has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sundance Energy Australia has a beta of 3.96, meaning that its stock price is 296% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

2.0% of Chesapeake Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Chesapeake Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Chesapeake Energy and Sundance Energy Australia, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chesapeake Energy	0	0	0	0	N/A
Sundance Energy Australia	0	0	0	0	N/A

Summary

Sundance Energy Australia beats Chesapeake Energy on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sundance Energy Australia vs. Viking Energy Group Stock

Viking Energy Group (OTCMKTS:VKIN) and Sundance Energy Australia (OTCMKTS:SDCJF) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

Viking Energy Group has a beta of 0.34, suggesting that its share price is 66% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sundance Energy Australia has a beta of 3.96, suggesting that its share price is 296% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Viking Energy Group and Sundance Energy Australia's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Viking Energy Group	-231.79%	-4,896.40%	-44.39%
Sundance Energy Australia	24.02%	13.45%	6.16%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Viking Energy Group and Sundance Energy Australia's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Viking Energy Group	$40.27 million	0.71	$-61,990,000.00	N/A	N/A
Sundance Energy Australia	$164.93 million	0.06	$-28,140,000.00	N/A	N/A

Sundance Energy Australia has higher revenue and earnings than Viking Energy Group.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Viking Energy Group and Sundance Energy Australia, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Viking Energy Group	0	0	0	0	N/A
Sundance Energy Australia	0	0	0	0	N/A

Summary

Sundance Energy Australia beats Viking Energy Group on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sundance Energy Australia vs. Trillion Energy International Stock

Sundance Energy Australia (OTCMKTS:SDCJF) and Trillion Energy International (OTCMKTS:TCFF) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Sundance Energy Australia and Trillion Energy International, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sundance Energy Australia	0	0	0	0	N/A
Trillion Energy International	0	0	0	0	N/A

Profitability

This table compares Sundance Energy Australia and Trillion Energy International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sundance Energy Australia	24.02%	13.45%	6.16%
Trillion Energy International	N/A	N/A	N/A

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Sundance Energy Australia and Trillion Energy International's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sundance Energy Australia	$164.93 million	0.06	$-28,140,000.00	N/A	N/A
Trillion Energy International	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Trillion Energy International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sundance Energy Australia.

Risk and Volatility

Sundance Energy Australia has a beta of 3.96, indicating that its stock price is 296% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Trillion Energy International has a beta of 4.25, indicating that its stock price is 325% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Sundance Energy Australia beats Trillion Energy International on 4 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sundance Energy Australia vs. Camber Energy Stock

Camber Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:CEI) and Sundance Energy Australia (OTCMKTS:SDCJF) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

Volatility & Risk

Camber Energy has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its share price is 28% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sundance Energy Australia has a beta of 3.96, meaning that its share price is 296% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Camber Energy and Sundance Energy Australia's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Camber Energy	$400,000.00	71.21	$-3,860,000.00	N/A	N/A
Sundance Energy Australia	$164.93 million	0.06	$-28,140,000.00	N/A	N/A

Camber Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sundance Energy Australia.

Profitability

This table compares Camber Energy and Sundance Energy Australia's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Camber Energy	N/A	N/A	N/A
Sundance Energy Australia	24.02%	13.45%	6.16%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Camber Energy and Sundance Energy Australia, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Camber Energy	0	0	0	0	N/A
Sundance Energy Australia	0	0	0	0	N/A

Institutional and Insider Ownership

7.4% of Camber Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of Camber Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Sundance Energy Australia beats Camber Energy on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.