ZEN Graphene Solutions Competitors

ZEN Graphene Solutions (OTCMKTS:ZENYF) and Intrepid Potash (NYSE:IPI) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

30.8% of Intrepid Potash shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.4% of Intrepid Potash shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares ZEN Graphene Solutions and Intrepid Potash's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Intrepid Potash has higher revenue and earnings than ZEN Graphene Solutions.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for ZEN Graphene Solutions and Intrepid Potash, as reported by MarketBeat.

Intrepid Potash has a consensus price target of $22.8667, suggesting a potential downside of 26.69%. Given Intrepid Potash's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Intrepid Potash is more favorable than ZEN Graphene Solutions.

Profitability

This table compares ZEN Graphene Solutions and Intrepid Potash's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

ZEN Graphene Solutions has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intrepid Potash has a beta of 2.26, indicating that its stock price is 126% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Intrepid Potash beats ZEN Graphene Solutions on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

ZEN Graphene Solutions (OTCMKTS:ZENYF) and Centrus Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:LEU) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

23.3% of Centrus Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.2% of Centrus Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares ZEN Graphene Solutions and Centrus Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

ZEN Graphene Solutions has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Centrus Energy.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for ZEN Graphene Solutions and Centrus Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

Centrus Energy has a consensus price target of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.95%. Given Centrus Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Centrus Energy is more favorable than ZEN Graphene Solutions.

Profitability

This table compares ZEN Graphene Solutions and Centrus Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

ZEN Graphene Solutions has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Centrus Energy has a beta of 3.71, indicating that its stock price is 271% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Centrus Energy beats ZEN Graphene Solutions on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ciner Resources (NYSE:CINR) and ZEN Graphene Solutions (OTCMKTS:ZENYF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Ciner Resources has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ZEN Graphene Solutions has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Ciner Resources and ZEN Graphene Solutions, as reported by MarketBeat.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

7.3% of Ciner Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Ciner Resources and ZEN Graphene Solutions' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Ciner Resources has higher revenue and earnings than ZEN Graphene Solutions.

Profitability

This table compares Ciner Resources and ZEN Graphene Solutions' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Ciner Resources beats ZEN Graphene Solutions on 8 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Galiano Gold (NYSEMKT:GAU) and ZEN Graphene Solutions (OTCMKTS:ZENYF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Galiano Gold has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ZEN Graphene Solutions has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Galiano Gold and ZEN Graphene Solutions, as reported by MarketBeat.

Galiano Gold currently has a consensus price target of $2.4333, indicating a potential upside of ∞. Given Galiano Gold's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Galiano Gold is more favorable than ZEN Graphene Solutions.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Galiano Gold and ZEN Graphene Solutions' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

ZEN Graphene Solutions has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Galiano Gold.

Profitability

This table compares Galiano Gold and ZEN Graphene Solutions' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

39.6% of Galiano Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Galiano Gold beats ZEN Graphene Solutions on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Gold Standard Ventures (NYSEAMERICAN:GSV) and ZEN Graphene Solutions (OTCMKTS:ZENYF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Gold Standard Ventures and ZEN Graphene Solutions, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Gold Standard Ventures presently has a consensus target price of $2.05, suggesting a potential upside of 274.16%. Given Gold Standard Ventures' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gold Standard Ventures is more favorable than ZEN Graphene Solutions.

Risk and Volatility

Gold Standard Ventures has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ZEN Graphene Solutions has a beta of 0.28, suggesting that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Gold Standard Ventures and ZEN Graphene Solutions' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Gold Standard Ventures and ZEN Graphene Solutions' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

22.2% of Gold Standard Ventures shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Gold Standard Ventures beats ZEN Graphene Solutions on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

ZEN Graphene Solutions (OTCMKTS:ZENYF) and Smart Sand (NASDAQ:SND) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and earnings.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

16.6% of Smart Sand shares are held by institutional investors. 50.4% of Smart Sand shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

ZEN Graphene Solutions has a beta of 0.28, meaning that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Smart Sand has a beta of 2.09, meaning that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for ZEN Graphene Solutions and Smart Sand, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Smart Sand has a consensus price target of $1.35, suggesting a potential downside of 46.22%. Given Smart Sand's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Smart Sand is more favorable than ZEN Graphene Solutions.

Profitability

This table compares ZEN Graphene Solutions and Smart Sand's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares ZEN Graphene Solutions and Smart Sand's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Smart Sand has higher revenue and earnings than ZEN Graphene Solutions.

Summary

Smart Sand beats ZEN Graphene Solutions on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.