China Zenix Auto International Competitors

China Zenix Auto International (OTCMKTS:ZXAIY) and Unique Fabricating (NYSEAMERICAN:UFAB) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Volatility & Risk

China Zenix Auto International has a beta of 2.45, meaning that its share price is 145% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Unique Fabricating has a beta of 1.92, meaning that its share price is 92% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for China Zenix Auto International and Unique Fabricating, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Profitability

This table compares China Zenix Auto International and Unique Fabricating's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares China Zenix Auto International and Unique Fabricating's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Unique Fabricating has lower revenue, but higher earnings than China Zenix Auto International.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

19.7% of Unique Fabricating shares are held by institutional investors. 70.2% of China Zenix Auto International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Unique Fabricating shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Unique Fabricating beats China Zenix Auto International on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

China Zenix Auto International (OTCMKTS:ZXAIY) and Worksport (OTCMKTS:WKSP) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Volatility and Risk

China Zenix Auto International has a beta of 2.45, suggesting that its share price is 145% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Worksport has a beta of 2.02, suggesting that its share price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares China Zenix Auto International and Worksport's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares China Zenix Auto International and Worksport's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Worksport has lower revenue, but higher earnings than China Zenix Auto International.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for China Zenix Auto International and Worksport, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

China Zenix Auto International (OTCMKTS:ZXAIY) and Regency Affiliates (OTCMKTS:RAFI) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Risk and Volatility

China Zenix Auto International has a beta of 2.45, meaning that its stock price is 145% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Regency Affiliates has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.0% of Regency Affiliates shares are owned by institutional investors. 70.2% of China Zenix Auto International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Regency Affiliates shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares China Zenix Auto International and Regency Affiliates' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares China Zenix Auto International and Regency Affiliates' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Regency Affiliates has lower revenue, but higher earnings than China Zenix Auto International.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for China Zenix Auto International and Regency Affiliates, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Summary

Regency Affiliates beats China Zenix Auto International on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Omnitek Engineering (OTCMKTS:OMTK) and China Zenix Auto International (OTCMKTS:ZXAIY) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Omnitek Engineering and China Zenix Auto International's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Omnitek Engineering has higher earnings, but lower revenue than China Zenix Auto International.

Volatility & Risk

Omnitek Engineering has a beta of 1.42, indicating that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Zenix Auto International has a beta of 2.45, indicating that its stock price is 145% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Omnitek Engineering and China Zenix Auto International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Omnitek Engineering and China Zenix Auto International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.0% of Omnitek Engineering shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.3% of Omnitek Engineering shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 70.2% of China Zenix Auto International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

China Zenix Auto International beats Omnitek Engineering on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

CurAegis Technologies (OTCMKTS:CRGS) and China Zenix Auto International (OTCMKTS:ZXAIY) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.1% of CurAegis Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.0% of CurAegis Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 70.2% of China Zenix Auto International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

CurAegis Technologies has a beta of -1.06, indicating that its stock price is 206% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Zenix Auto International has a beta of 2.45, indicating that its stock price is 145% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares CurAegis Technologies and China Zenix Auto International's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

CurAegis Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than China Zenix Auto International.

Profitability

This table compares CurAegis Technologies and China Zenix Auto International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for CurAegis Technologies and China Zenix Auto International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Summary

China Zenix Auto International beats CurAegis Technologies on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Puradyn Filter Technologies (OTCMKTS:PFTI) and China Zenix Auto International (OTCMKTS:ZXAIY) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, earnings, dividends and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Puradyn Filter Technologies has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Zenix Auto International has a beta of 2.45, suggesting that its share price is 145% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Puradyn Filter Technologies and China Zenix Auto International's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Puradyn Filter Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than China Zenix Auto International.

Profitability

This table compares Puradyn Filter Technologies and China Zenix Auto International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Puradyn Filter Technologies and China Zenix Auto International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Summary

Puradyn Filter Technologies beats China Zenix Auto International on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.