Fission Uranium Competitors

Fission Uranium (TSE:FCU) and North American Palladium (TSE:PDL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Fission Uranium and North American Palladium's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

North American Palladium has higher revenue and earnings than Fission Uranium. Fission Uranium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Palladium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Fission Uranium and North American Palladium's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Fission Uranium and North American Palladium, as reported by MarketBeat.

Fission Uranium currently has a consensus target price of C$1.10, indicating a potential upside of 103.70%.

Summary

North American Palladium beats Fission Uranium on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Osisko Mining (TSE:OSK) and Fission Uranium (TSE:FCU) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Osisko Mining and Fission Uranium, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Osisko Mining currently has a consensus price target of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 112.12%. Fission Uranium has a consensus price target of C$1.10, indicating a potential upside of 103.70%. Given Osisko Mining's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Osisko Mining is more favorable than Fission Uranium.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Osisko Mining and Fission Uranium's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Osisko Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fission Uranium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Osisko Mining and Fission Uranium's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Fission Uranium beats Osisko Mining on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fission Uranium (TSE:FCU) and Maverix Metals (TSE:MMX) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Fission Uranium and Maverix Metals, as provided by MarketBeat.

Fission Uranium presently has a consensus price target of C$1.10, indicating a potential upside of 103.70%. Maverix Metals has a consensus price target of C$8.50, indicating a potential upside of 12.43%. Given Fission Uranium's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Fission Uranium is more favorable than Maverix Metals.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Fission Uranium and Maverix Metals' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Maverix Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Fission Uranium. Fission Uranium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Maverix Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Fission Uranium and Maverix Metals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Maverix Metals beats Fission Uranium on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fission Uranium (TSE:FCU) and Denison Mines (TSE:DML) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Fission Uranium and Denison Mines' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Fission Uranium and Denison Mines' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Fission Uranium has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Denison Mines. Denison Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fission Uranium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Fission Uranium and Denison Mines, as provided by MarketBeat.

Fission Uranium presently has a consensus price target of C$1.10, indicating a potential upside of 103.70%. Denison Mines has a consensus price target of C$1.40, indicating a potential upside of 18.64%. Given Fission Uranium's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Fission Uranium is more favorable than Denison Mines.

Summary

Fission Uranium beats Denison Mines on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fission Uranium (TSE:FCU) and K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.V) (CVE:KNT) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Fission Uranium and K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.V)'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Fission Uranium and K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.V)'s revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.V) has higher revenue and earnings than Fission Uranium. Fission Uranium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.V), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Fission Uranium and K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.V), as provided by MarketBeat.

Fission Uranium presently has a consensus target price of C$1.10, suggesting a potential upside of 103.70%. K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.V) has a consensus target price of C$10.35, suggesting a potential upside of 29.54%. Given Fission Uranium's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fission Uranium is more favorable than K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.V).

Summary

K92 Mining Inc. (KNT.V) beats Fission Uranium on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fission Uranium (TSE:FCU) and Novo Resources Corp. (NVO.V) (CVE:NVO) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Fission Uranium and Novo Resources Corp. (NVO.V), as provided by MarketBeat.

Fission Uranium presently has a consensus target price of C$1.10, suggesting a potential upside of 103.70%. Novo Resources Corp. (NVO.V) has a consensus target price of C$3.05, suggesting a potential upside of 28.15%. Given Fission Uranium's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fission Uranium is more favorable than Novo Resources Corp. (NVO.V).

Profitability

This table compares Fission Uranium and Novo Resources Corp. (NVO.V)'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Fission Uranium and Novo Resources Corp. (NVO.V)'s revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Fission Uranium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Novo Resources Corp. (NVO.V), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Fission Uranium beats Novo Resources Corp. (NVO.V) on 5 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.