401(k) vs Roth IRA: Understanding the Mathematical Advantage

Retirement planners often debate whether to max out a 401(k) or prioritize a Roth IRA. A mathematical analysis reveals that, contrary to popular advice, maxing out a 401(k) before investing in a Roth IRA may provide better long-term financial outcomes.

The Mathematical Comparison

The tax treatment significantly differs in outcomes when comparing these retirement vehicles. This analysis assumes no employer match for the 401(k) and examines the growth of identical investment amounts over 30 years with an 8% annual return.

View this post on Instagram

 

401(k) Investment Scenario

With a 401(k), contributions are made with pre-tax dollars, providing an immediate tax advantage. A $23,500 pre-tax contribution grows tax-deferred until withdrawal.

After 30 years of 8% annual growth, this investment would grow to approximately $236,500. When withdrawn during retirement, assuming the average retiree’s effective tax rate of 5.7%, the after-tax amount would be about $223,000.

Roth IRA Investment Scenario

For a Roth IRA, taxes are paid upfront at the contributor’s current tax rate. The average working American faces an effective tax rate of 14.5%, meaning a $23,500 contribution would be reduced to $20,090 after taxes.

This smaller initial investment, growing at the same 8% rate over 30 years, would reach approximately $202,000. While Roth IRA withdrawals are tax-free in retirement, the final amount remains lower than the 401(k) option.

Key Findings

• The 401(k) option results in approximately $21,000 more in retirement funds
• The tax advantage occurs because most people pay higher tax rates during working years than in retirement.
• This calculation doesn’t account for potential employer matches, which would further favor the 401(k) option.

It’s worth noting that actual Roth IRA contribution limits are lower than the amount used in this example. For 2023, the maximum Roth IRA contribution is $6,500 ($7,500 for those 50 and older), while 401(k) limits are $22,500 ($30,000 for those 50 and older).

This mathematical advantage explains why financial professionals who do not sell specific investment products often recommend maximizing 401(k) contributions before funding a Roth IRA. The tax efficiency of paying lower rates in retirement rather than higher rates during working years creates a meaningful difference in long-term wealth accumulation.

Individual circumstances may vary based on expected future tax rates, income levels, and specific retirement goals. Those anticipating significantly higher tax rates in retirement might find different results in their personal calculations.

---

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Does this analysis change if my employer offers a 401(k) match?

If your employer offers a match on 401(k) contributions, the advantage of maxing out your 401(k) first becomes even stronger. An employer match represents an immediate, guaranteed return on your investment that you won’t get with a Roth IRA, making the 401(k) option even more financially beneficial.

Q: What if I expect a higher tax bracket during retirement?

This analysis uses average tax rates, but your situation may differ. If you expect to be in a significantly higher tax bracket during retirement than during your working years, the Roth IRA’s tax-free withdrawals might become more advantageous. Consider consulting with a financial advisor to run calculations based on your tax situation.

Q: Is there any benefit to contributing to both types of accounts?

Yes, there can be benefits to tax diversification in retirement. After maxing out your 401(k), contributing to a Roth IRA gives you both taxable and tax-free withdrawal options in retirement. This flexibility can help optimize your tax situation as you withdraw funds during retirement years.

 

The post 401(k) vs Roth IRA: Understanding the Mathematical Advantage appeared first on Due.