China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and Cobalt 27 Capital (CVE:KBLT) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership and dividends.
Earnings & Valuation
This table compares China Gold International Resources and Cobalt 27 Capital's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.
| Gross Revenue | Price/Sales Ratio | Net Income | Earnings Per Share | Price/Earnings Ratio |
---|
China Gold International Resources | C$864.03 million | 1.71 | C$140.33 million | C$0.35 | 10.54 |
Cobalt 27 Capital | C$-167,719,456.00 | -2.22 | C$-236,509,325.00 | C($2.77) | -1.58 |
China Gold International Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Cobalt 27 Capital. Cobalt 27 Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Profitability
This table compares China Gold International Resources and Cobalt 27 Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
| Net Margins | Return on Equity | Return on Assets |
---|
China Gold International Resources | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Cobalt 27 Capital | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Analyst Recommendations
This is a summary of current ratings for China Gold International Resources and Cobalt 27 Capital, as provided by MarketBeat.com.
| Sell Ratings | Hold Ratings | Buy Ratings | Strong Buy Ratings | Rating Score |
---|
China Gold International Resources | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3.00 |
Cobalt 27 Capital | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N/A |
China Gold International Resources currently has a consensus target price of C$3.15, indicating a potential downside of 15.55%. Given China Gold International Resources' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe China Gold International Resources is more favorable than Cobalt 27 Capital.
Summary
China Gold International Resources beats Cobalt 27 Capital on 7 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.