Lorne Park Capital Partners Competitors

Lorne Park Capital Partners (CVE:LPC) and Canadian Banc (TSE:BK) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Lorne Park Capital Partners and Canadian Banc's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Lorne Park Capital Partners and Canadian Banc's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Lorne Park Capital Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Canadian Banc. Canadian Banc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lorne Park Capital Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Lorne Park Capital Partners pays an annual dividend of C$0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Canadian Banc pays an annual dividend of C$0.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.4%. Lorne Park Capital Partners pays out 166.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Canadian Banc pays out -40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Canadian Banc is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Lorne Park Capital Partners and Canadian Banc, as provided by MarketBeat.

Summary

Lorne Park Capital Partners beats Canadian Banc on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lorne Park Capital Partners (CVE:LPC) and Olympia Financial Group (TSE:OLY) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Lorne Park Capital Partners and Olympia Financial Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Lorne Park Capital Partners and Olympia Financial Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Olympia Financial Group has higher revenue and earnings than Lorne Park Capital Partners. Olympia Financial Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lorne Park Capital Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Lorne Park Capital Partners pays an annual dividend of C$0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Olympia Financial Group pays an annual dividend of C$2.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Lorne Park Capital Partners pays out 166.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Olympia Financial Group pays out 83.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Olympia Financial Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Lorne Park Capital Partners and Olympia Financial Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

Summary

Olympia Financial Group beats Lorne Park Capital Partners on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lorne Park Capital Partners (CVE:LPC) and East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt (TSE:ECF.UN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Lorne Park Capital Partners and East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Lorne Park Capital Partners has higher revenue and earnings than East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Lorne Park Capital Partners and East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt, as provided by MarketBeat.

Dividends

Lorne Park Capital Partners pays an annual dividend of C$0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt pays an annual dividend of C$0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Lorne Park Capital Partners pays out 166.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Profitability

This table compares Lorne Park Capital Partners and East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

East Coast Investment Grade Inc Unt beats Lorne Park Capital Partners on 2 of the 3 factors compared between the two stocks.

TSE:PIC.A (TSE:PIC.A) and Lorne Park Capital Partners (CVE:LPC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares TSE:PIC.A and Lorne Park Capital Partners' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

TSE:PIC.A pays an annual dividend of C$0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.4%. Lorne Park Capital Partners pays an annual dividend of C$0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. TSE:PIC.A pays out -11.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lorne Park Capital Partners pays out 166.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TSE:PIC.A is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares TSE:PIC.A and Lorne Park Capital Partners' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Lorne Park Capital Partners has higher revenue and earnings than TSE:PIC.A. TSE:PIC.A is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lorne Park Capital Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for TSE:PIC.A and Lorne Park Capital Partners, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Summary

Lorne Park Capital Partners beats TSE:PIC.A on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Integrated Asset Management (TSE:IAM) and Lorne Park Capital Partners (CVE:LPC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Integrated Asset Management and Lorne Park Capital Partners' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Integrated Asset Management pays an annual dividend of C$0.11 per share. Lorne Park Capital Partners pays an annual dividend of C$0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Integrated Asset Management pays out 100.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lorne Park Capital Partners pays out 166.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Integrated Asset Management and Lorne Park Capital Partners' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Integrated Asset Management has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lorne Park Capital Partners. Integrated Asset Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lorne Park Capital Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Integrated Asset Management and Lorne Park Capital Partners, as reported by MarketBeat.

Dividend 15 Split Corp. II (TSE:DF) and Lorne Park Capital Partners (CVE:LPC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Dividend 15 Split Corp. II and Lorne Park Capital Partners' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Lorne Park Capital Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Dividend 15 Split Corp. II.

Dividends

Dividend 15 Split Corp. II pays an annual dividend of C$0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Lorne Park Capital Partners pays an annual dividend of C$0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Lorne Park Capital Partners pays out 166.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Profitability

This table compares Dividend 15 Split Corp. II and Lorne Park Capital Partners' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Dividend 15 Split Corp. II and Lorne Park Capital Partners, as reported by MarketBeat.

Summary

Dividend 15 Split Corp. II beats Lorne Park Capital Partners on 2 of the 3 factors compared between the two stocks.