CVE:MMG

Metallic Minerals Competitors

C$0.58

-0.04 (-6.45 %)

(As of 05/12/2021 03:57 PM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

C$0.57

▼

C$0.62

50-Day Range

C$0.57

▼

C$0.68

52-Week Range

C$0.21

▼

C$1.30

Volume175,363 shs

Average Volume175,978 shs

Market CapitalizationC$73.01 million

P/E RatioN/A

Dividend YieldN/A

BetaN/A

Metallic Minerals (CVE:MMG) Vs. LAM, SLL, RIO, LFX, GGI, and ML

Should you be buying MMG stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "industrial metals & minerals" are considered alternatives and competitors to Metallic Minerals, including Laramide Resources (LAM), Standard Lithium (SLL), Rio2 (RIO), LeadFX (LFX), Garibaldi Resources (GGI), and Millennial Lithium (ML).

Metallic Minerals vs. Laramide Resources Stock

Metallic Minerals (CVE:MMG) and Laramide Resources (TSE:LAM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Metallic Minerals and Laramide Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Metallic Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A
Laramide Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Metallic Minerals and Laramide Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Metallic Minerals	0	0	0	0	N/A
Laramide Resources	0	0	0	0	N/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Metallic Minerals and Laramide Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Metallic Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A	C($0.07)	-8.41
Laramide Resources	C$1,575.00	57,144.34	C$-5,500,143.00	C($0.03)	-16.36

Metallic Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Laramide Resources. Laramide Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metallic Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Laramide Resources beats Metallic Minerals on 2 of the 3 factors compared between the two stocks.

Metallic Minerals vs. Standard Lithium Stock

Metallic Minerals (CVE:MMG) and Standard Lithium (CVE:SLL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Metallic Minerals and Standard Lithium, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Metallic Minerals	0	0	0	0	N/A
Standard Lithium	0	0	0	0	N/A

Standard Lithium has a consensus price target of C$4.75, indicating a potential upside of 31.58%. Given Standard Lithium's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Standard Lithium is more favorable than Metallic Minerals.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Metallic Minerals and Standard Lithium's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Metallic Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A	C($0.07)	-8.41
Standard Lithium	N/A	N/A	N/A	C($0.17)	-21.24

Standard Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metallic Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Metallic Minerals and Standard Lithium's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Metallic Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A
Standard Lithium	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Metallic Minerals beats Standard Lithium on 2 of the 3 factors compared between the two stocks.

Metallic Minerals vs. Rio2 Stock

Metallic Minerals (CVE:MMG) and Rio2 (CVE:RIO) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Metallic Minerals and Rio2's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Metallic Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A
Rio2	N/A	N/A	N/A

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Metallic Minerals and Rio2, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Metallic Minerals	0	0	0	0	N/A
Rio2	0	0	0	1	4.00

Rio2 has a consensus target price of C$1.50, suggesting a potential upside of 108.33%. Given Rio2's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Rio2 is more favorable than Metallic Minerals.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Metallic Minerals and Rio2's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Metallic Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A	C($0.07)	-8.41
Rio2	N/A	N/A	N/A	C($0.07)	-11.08

Rio2 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metallic Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Rio2 beats Metallic Minerals on 3 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

Metallic Minerals vs. LeadFX Stock

LeadFX (TSE:LFX) and Metallic Minerals (CVE:MMG) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for LeadFX and Metallic Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
LeadFX	0	0	0	0	N/A
Metallic Minerals	0	0	0	0	N/A

Profitability

This table compares LeadFX and Metallic Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
LeadFX	N/A	N/A	N/A
Metallic Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares LeadFX and Metallic Minerals' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
LeadFX	N/A	N/A	N/A	C($0.12)	N/A
Metallic Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A	C($0.07)	-8.41

Metallic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LeadFX, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Metallic Minerals vs. Garibaldi Resources Stock

Metallic Minerals (CVE:MMG) and Garibaldi Resources (CVE:GGI) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Metallic Minerals and Garibaldi Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Metallic Minerals	0	0	0	0	N/A
Garibaldi Resources	0	0	0	0	N/A

Profitability

This table compares Metallic Minerals and Garibaldi Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Metallic Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A
Garibaldi Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Metallic Minerals and Garibaldi Resources' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Metallic Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A	C($0.07)	-8.41
Garibaldi Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A	C($0.04)	-11.25

Garibaldi Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metallic Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Metallic Minerals vs. Millennial Lithium Stock

Metallic Minerals (CVE:MMG) and Millennial Lithium (CVE:ML) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Metallic Minerals and Millennial Lithium, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Metallic Minerals	0	0	0	0	N/A
Millennial Lithium	0	0	0	0	N/A

Millennial Lithium has a consensus target price of C$4.60, indicating a potential upside of 70.37%. Given Millennial Lithium's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Millennial Lithium is more favorable than Metallic Minerals.

Profitability

This table compares Metallic Minerals and Millennial Lithium's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Metallic Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A
Millennial Lithium	N/A	N/A	N/A

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Metallic Minerals and Millennial Lithium's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Metallic Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A	C($0.07)	-8.41
Millennial Lithium	N/A	N/A	N/A	C($0.04)	-72.97

Millennial Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metallic Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Millennial Lithium beats Metallic Minerals on 2 of the 3 factors compared between the two stocks.