Maverix Metals Competitors

Superior Plus (TSE:SPB) and Maverix Metals (CVE:MMX) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Superior Plus and Maverix Metals' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Superior Plus has higher revenue and earnings than Maverix Metals. Superior Plus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Maverix Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Superior Plus and Maverix Metals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Superior Plus and Maverix Metals, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Superior Plus currently has a consensus price target of C$14.67, suggesting a potential upside of 7.37%. Maverix Metals has a consensus price target of C$8.05, suggesting a potential upside of 39.76%. Given Maverix Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Maverix Metals is more favorable than Superior Plus.

Summary

Maverix Metals beats Superior Plus on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Pretium Resources (TSE:PVG) and Maverix Metals (CVE:MMX) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Pretium Resources and Maverix Metals' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Maverix Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pretium Resources. Pretium Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Maverix Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Pretium Resources and Maverix Metals, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Pretium Resources currently has a consensus price target of C$16.17, suggesting a potential upside of 26.70%. Maverix Metals has a consensus price target of C$8.05, suggesting a potential upside of 39.76%. Given Maverix Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Maverix Metals is more favorable than Pretium Resources.

Profitability

This table compares Pretium Resources and Maverix Metals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Maverix Metals beats Pretium Resources on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lundin Gold (TSE:LUG) and Maverix Metals (CVE:MMX) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Lundin Gold and Maverix Metals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Lundin Gold and Maverix Metals' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Maverix Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lundin Gold. Lundin Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Maverix Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Lundin Gold and Maverix Metals, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Lundin Gold presently has a consensus target price of C$15.96, suggesting a potential upside of 57.59%. Maverix Metals has a consensus target price of C$8.05, suggesting a potential upside of 39.76%. Given Lundin Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Lundin Gold is more favorable than Maverix Metals.

Lithium Americas (TSE:LAC) and Maverix Metals (CVE:MMX) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, valuation and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Lithium Americas and Maverix Metals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Lithium Americas and Maverix Metals' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Maverix Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Lithium Americas. Lithium Americas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Maverix Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Lithium Americas and Maverix Metals, as reported by MarketBeat.

Lithium Americas currently has a consensus price target of C$20.88, indicating a potential upside of 13.88%. Maverix Metals has a consensus price target of C$8.05, indicating a potential upside of 39.76%. Given Maverix Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Maverix Metals is more favorable than Lithium Americas.

Summary

Maverix Metals beats Lithium Americas on 8 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Interfor Co. (IFP.TO) (TSE:IFP) and Maverix Metals (CVE:MMX) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, valuation and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Interfor Co. (IFP.TO) and Maverix Metals, as reported by MarketBeat.

Interfor Co. (IFP.TO) currently has a consensus price target of C$36.33, indicating a potential upside of 33.73%. Maverix Metals has a consensus price target of C$8.05, indicating a potential upside of 39.76%. Given Maverix Metals' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Maverix Metals is more favorable than Interfor Co. (IFP.TO).

Profitability

This table compares Interfor Co. (IFP.TO) and Maverix Metals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Interfor Co. (IFP.TO) and Maverix Metals' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Interfor Co. (IFP.TO) has higher revenue and earnings than Maverix Metals. Interfor Co. (IFP.TO) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Maverix Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Interfor Co. (IFP.TO) beats Maverix Metals on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Maverix Metals (CVE:MMX) and Nexa Resources (TSE:NEXA) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Maverix Metals and Nexa Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Maverix Metals currently has a consensus price target of C$8.05, indicating a potential upside of 39.76%. Nexa Resources has a consensus price target of C$15.00, indicating a potential upside of 11.94%. Given Maverix Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Maverix Metals is more favorable than Nexa Resources.

Profitability

This table compares Maverix Metals and Nexa Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Maverix Metals and Nexa Resources' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Maverix Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Nexa Resources. Nexa Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Maverix Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Maverix Metals beats Nexa Resources on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.