GFT Technologies Competitors

SMA Solar Technology (ETR:S92) and GFT Technologies (ETR:GFT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares SMA Solar Technology and GFT Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for SMA Solar Technology and GFT Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.

SMA Solar Technology currently has a consensus price target of €50.25, indicating a potential upside of 7.10%. GFT Technologies has a consensus price target of €14.50, indicating a potential downside of 10.93%. Given SMA Solar Technology's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe SMA Solar Technology is more favorable than GFT Technologies.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares SMA Solar Technology and GFT Technologies' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

SMA Solar Technology has higher revenue and earnings than GFT Technologies. GFT Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SMA Solar Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

SMA Solar Technology pays an annual dividend of €0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. GFT Technologies pays an annual dividend of €0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. SMA Solar Technology pays out 43.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GFT Technologies pays out 52.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

SMA Solar Technology beats GFT Technologies on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

RIB Software (ETR:RIB) and GFT Technologies (ETR:GFT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares RIB Software and GFT Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for RIB Software and GFT Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.

RIB Software currently has a consensus price target of €26.00, indicating a potential downside of 9.25%. GFT Technologies has a consensus price target of €14.50, indicating a potential downside of 10.93%. Given RIB Software's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe RIB Software is more favorable than GFT Technologies.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares RIB Software and GFT Technologies' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

RIB Software has higher earnings, but lower revenue than GFT Technologies. GFT Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RIB Software, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

RIB Software pays an annual dividend of €0.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. GFT Technologies pays an annual dividend of €0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. RIB Software pays out 302.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. GFT Technologies pays out 52.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

RIB Software beats GFT Technologies on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

S&T (ETR:SANT) and GFT Technologies (ETR:GFT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares S&T and GFT Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for S&T and GFT Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.

S&T currently has a consensus price target of €30.60, indicating a potential upside of 35.04%. GFT Technologies has a consensus price target of €14.50, indicating a potential downside of 10.93%. Given S&T's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe S&T is more favorable than GFT Technologies.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares S&T and GFT Technologies' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

S&T has higher revenue and earnings than GFT Technologies. S&T is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GFT Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

S&T pays an annual dividend of €0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. GFT Technologies pays an annual dividend of €0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. S&T pays out 19.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GFT Technologies pays out 52.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

S&T beats GFT Technologies on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Jenoptik (ETR:JEN) and GFT Technologies (ETR:GFT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Jenoptik and GFT Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Jenoptik and GFT Technologies' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Jenoptik has higher revenue and earnings than GFT Technologies. Jenoptik is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GFT Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Jenoptik pays an annual dividend of €0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. GFT Technologies pays an annual dividend of €0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Jenoptik pays out 34.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GFT Technologies pays out 52.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Jenoptik and GFT Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.

Jenoptik currently has a consensus price target of €28.29, indicating a potential upside of 11.45%. GFT Technologies has a consensus price target of €14.50, indicating a potential downside of 10.93%. Given Jenoptik's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Jenoptik is more favorable than GFT Technologies.

Summary

Jenoptik beats GFT Technologies on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Isra Vision (ETR:ISR) and GFT Technologies (ETR:GFT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Isra Vision and GFT Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Isra Vision and GFT Technologies' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

GFT Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Isra Vision. GFT Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Isra Vision, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Isra Vision pays an annual dividend of €0.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. GFT Technologies pays an annual dividend of €0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Isra Vision pays out 56.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. GFT Technologies pays out 52.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. GFT Technologies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Isra Vision and GFT Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.

GFT Technologies has a consensus price target of €14.50, indicating a potential downside of 10.93%. Given GFT Technologies' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe GFT Technologies is more favorable than Isra Vision.

Summary

GFT Technologies beats Isra Vision on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

ADVA Optical Networking (ETR:ADV) and GFT Technologies (ETR:GFT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares ADVA Optical Networking and GFT Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares ADVA Optical Networking and GFT Technologies' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

ADVA Optical Networking has higher revenue and earnings than GFT Technologies. ADVA Optical Networking is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GFT Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for ADVA Optical Networking and GFT Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.

ADVA Optical Networking currently has a consensus price target of €10.50, indicating a potential upside of 9.95%. GFT Technologies has a consensus price target of €14.50, indicating a potential downside of 10.93%. Given ADVA Optical Networking's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe ADVA Optical Networking is more favorable than GFT Technologies.

Summary

ADVA Optical Networking beats GFT Technologies on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.