Free Trial
→ Elon Musk’s One Stock Retirement Plan (From Brownstone Research) (Ad)tc pixel Free AMC Stock Alerts

Amur Minerals (AMC) Competitors

Amur Minerals logo
GBX 186.48 +10.48 (+5.95%)
As of 11:10 AM Eastern
Compare

AMC vs. JAY, CNG, SKA, PXC, and ALBA

Should you buy Amur Minerals stock or one of its competitors? Amur Minerals's main competitors and comparable companies include Bluejay Mining (JAY), China Nonferrous Gold (CNG), Shuka Minerals (SKA), Phoenix Copper (PXC), and Alba Mineral Resources (ALBA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Amur Minerals compare to Bluejay Mining?

Amur Minerals (LON:AMC) and Bluejay Mining (LON:JAY) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Amur Minerals has a beta of 0.3, suggesting that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bluejay Mining has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

5.0% of Bluejay Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Amur Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 42.3% of Bluejay Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Bluejay Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Amur Minerals.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Amur MineralsN/AN/A-£2.39MN/AN/A
Bluejay Mining-£1.05K0.00-£1.81MN/AN/A

Bluejay Mining's return on equity of -4.56% beat Amur Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Amur MineralsN/A -14.97% -7.77%
Bluejay Mining N/A -4.56%-8.07%

In the previous week, Amur Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Bluejay Mining. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Amur Minerals and 0 mentions for Bluejay Mining. Bluejay Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Amur Minerals' score of -0.71 indicating that Bluejay Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Amur Minerals Negative
Bluejay Mining Neutral

Summary

Bluejay Mining beats Amur Minerals on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Amur Minerals compare to China Nonferrous Gold?

China Nonferrous Gold (LON:CNG) and Amur Minerals (LON:AMC) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Amur Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than China Nonferrous Gold.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Nonferrous Gold£67.99M0.00-£294.76M-£5.93N/A
Amur MineralsN/AN/A-£2.39MN/AN/A

4.3% of China Nonferrous Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 72.2% of China Nonferrous Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Amur Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

China Nonferrous Gold's return on equity of 0.00% beat Amur Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Nonferrous GoldN/A N/A 0.47%
Amur Minerals N/A -14.97%-7.77%

In the previous week, Amur Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than China Nonferrous Gold. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Amur Minerals and 0 mentions for China Nonferrous Gold. China Nonferrous Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Amur Minerals' score of -0.71 indicating that China Nonferrous Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
China Nonferrous Gold Positive
Amur Minerals Negative

China Nonferrous Gold has a beta of 0.1, meaning that its share price is 90% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amur Minerals has a beta of 0.3, meaning that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

China Nonferrous Gold beats Amur Minerals on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Amur Minerals compare to Shuka Minerals?

Shuka Minerals (LON:SKA) and Amur Minerals (LON:AMC) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

1.4% of Shuka Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 58.1% of Shuka Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Amur Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shuka MineralsN/AN/A-£1.69M-£1.15N/A
Amur MineralsN/AN/A-£2.39MN/AN/A

Shuka Minerals has a beta of 1.186, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amur Minerals has a beta of 0.3, indicating that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Amur Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Shuka Minerals' net margin of -86,907.55%. Amur Minerals' return on equity of -14.97% beat Shuka Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shuka Minerals-86,907.55% -15.77% -13.94%
Amur Minerals N/A -14.97%-7.77%

In the previous week, Amur Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Shuka Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Amur Minerals and 0 mentions for Shuka Minerals. Shuka Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Amur Minerals' score of -0.71 indicating that Shuka Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Shuka Minerals Neutral
Amur Minerals Negative

Summary

Shuka Minerals beats Amur Minerals on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Amur Minerals compare to Phoenix Copper?

Phoenix Copper (LON:PXC) and Amur Minerals (LON:AMC) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, Phoenix Copper and Phoenix Copper both had 1 articles in the media. Phoenix Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Amur Minerals' score of -0.71 indicating that Phoenix Copper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Phoenix Copper
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Amur Minerals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative

Phoenix Copper's return on equity of -12.61% beat Amur Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Phoenix CopperN/A -12.61% -2.63%
Amur Minerals N/A -14.97%-7.77%

0.7% of Phoenix Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.8% of Phoenix Copper shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Amur Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Phoenix Copper has a beta of 0.334, indicating that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amur Minerals has a beta of 0.3, indicating that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Phoenix CopperN/AN/A-£2.86M-£2.02N/A
Amur MineralsN/AN/A-£2.39MN/AN/A

Summary

Phoenix Copper beats Amur Minerals on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Amur Minerals compare to Alba Mineral Resources?

Amur Minerals (LON:AMC) and Alba Mineral Resources (LON:ALBA) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Amur Minerals has a beta of 0.3, meaning that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alba Mineral Resources has a beta of 0.25, meaning that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Amur MineralsN/AN/A-£2.39MN/AN/A
Alba Mineral ResourcesN/AN/A-£2.94M-£0.01N/A

In the previous week, Amur Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Alba Mineral Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Amur Minerals and 0 mentions for Alba Mineral Resources. Alba Mineral Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Amur Minerals' score of -0.71 indicating that Alba Mineral Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Amur Minerals Negative
Alba Mineral Resources Neutral

Amur Minerals' return on equity of -14.97% beat Alba Mineral Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Amur MineralsN/A -14.97% -7.77%
Alba Mineral Resources N/A -28.14%-4.17%

Summary

Amur Minerals beats Alba Mineral Resources on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Amur Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for AMC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

AMC vs. The Competition

Export
MetricAmur MineralsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.59B£3.67B£4.65B£2.80B
Dividend Yield4.49%5.25%4.78%6.26%
P/E Ratio-8.7523.6423.53366.78
Price / SalesN/A27,246.7216,227.1888,865.26
Price / Cash3.0027.0124.8827.85
Price / BookN/A11.649.687.07
Net Income-£2.39M£127.18M£159.17M£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-2.49%-2.12%0.25%
1 Month PerformanceN/A76.18%55.62%-0.03%
1 Year PerformanceN/A10.79%10.31%22.90%

Amur Minerals Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
AMC
Amur Minerals
N/AGBX 186.48
+6.0%		N/AN/A£2.59BN/AN/A33,700
JAY
Bluejay Mining
N/AN/AN/AN/A£4.98M-£1.05KN/A13
CNG
China Nonferrous Gold
N/AN/AN/AN/A£4.97M£67.99MN/A701
SKA
Shuka Minerals
N/AGBX 3.34
-1.9%		N/A-30.0%£4.80MN/AN/A6
PXC
Phoenix Copper
N/AGBX 0.55
+4.8%		N/A-80.2%£4.63MN/AN/A18

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:AMC) was last updated on 10/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Elon Musk’s One Stock Retirement Plan
Jeff Brown picked Nvidia in 2016, before it surged 37,000 percent. Now he's tracking a small AI company he say...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's about to unleash his Midterm Weapon
Trump is turning the midterms into a referendum on American energy, pushing for more oil, more gas, and lower ...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
Wall Street legend reveals his top AI stock before Oct. 20
Marc Chaikin, the 60-year Wall Street veteran behind the Power Gauge rating system, has flagged a new AI stock...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Iran War Isn’t Chaos. It’s Strategy.
Two thousand missiles struck Iran. Three days later, Dylan Jovine sat in two private meetings with U.S. Congre...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
How one AI fund pays investors every Thursday
One small fund tied to artificial intelligence stocks delivered $1,051 in a single month, not through selling ...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
INSANE DRONE FOOTAGE
New drone footage shows a mysterious factory rising at one of Elon Musk's most secure facilities, cleared and ...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Federal Reserve Reveals Disturbing New Plan To Control Your Money
A Federal Reserve filing, Docket No. OP-1670, is drawing scrutiny for language that could expand the Fed's vis...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
A letter from Shannon Stansberry
Porter Stansberry nearly canceled the entire project. When he first saw the claimed returns - only one down ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel