Boston Omaha Competitors

BRP Group (NASDAQ:BRP) and Boston Omaha (NASDAQ:BOMN) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends and earnings.

Risk & Volatility

BRP Group has a beta of 1.53, indicating that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boston Omaha has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares BRP Group and Boston Omaha's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Boston Omaha has lower revenue, but higher earnings than BRP Group.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

84.8% of BRP Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.8% of Boston Omaha shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.9% of BRP Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 53.0% of Boston Omaha shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares BRP Group and Boston Omaha's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for BRP Group and Boston Omaha, as reported by MarketBeat.

BRP Group presently has a consensus target price of $32.50, indicating a potential upside of 10.66%. Boston Omaha has a consensus target price of $21.00, indicating a potential downside of 20.09%. Given BRP Group's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe BRP Group is more favorable than Boston Omaha.

Summary

BRP Group beats Boston Omaha on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fulton Financial (NASDAQ:FULT) and Boston Omaha (NASDAQ:BOMN) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Fulton Financial and Boston Omaha, as reported by MarketBeat.

Fulton Financial presently has a consensus target price of $12.00, indicating a potential downside of 30.39%. Boston Omaha has a consensus target price of $21.00, indicating a potential downside of 20.09%. Given Boston Omaha's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Boston Omaha is more favorable than Fulton Financial.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Fulton Financial and Boston Omaha's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Fulton Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Boston Omaha.

Profitability

This table compares Fulton Financial and Boston Omaha's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

62.6% of Fulton Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.8% of Boston Omaha shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Fulton Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 53.0% of Boston Omaha shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Fulton Financial has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boston Omaha has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Fulton Financial beats Boston Omaha on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Boston Omaha (NASDAQ:BOMN) and Independent Bank (NASDAQ:INDB) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Boston Omaha and Independent Bank, as reported by MarketBeat.

Boston Omaha presently has a consensus target price of $21.00, indicating a potential downside of 20.09%. Independent Bank has a consensus target price of $70.00, indicating a potential downside of 16.16%. Given Independent Bank's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Independent Bank is more favorable than Boston Omaha.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Boston Omaha and Independent Bank's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Independent Bank has higher revenue and earnings than Boston Omaha.

Profitability

This table compares Boston Omaha and Independent Bank's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

85.8% of Boston Omaha shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Independent Bank shares are owned by institutional investors. 53.0% of Boston Omaha shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Independent Bank shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Boston Omaha has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Independent Bank has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Independent Bank beats Boston Omaha on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Boston Omaha (NASDAQ:BOMN) and FirstCash (NASDAQ:FCFS) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Boston Omaha and FirstCash, as reported by MarketBeat.

Boston Omaha presently has a consensus target price of $21.00, indicating a potential downside of 20.09%. FirstCash has a consensus target price of $77.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.93%. Given FirstCash's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe FirstCash is more favorable than Boston Omaha.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Boston Omaha and FirstCash's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

FirstCash has higher revenue and earnings than Boston Omaha.

Profitability

This table compares Boston Omaha and FirstCash's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

85.8% of Boston Omaha shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of FirstCash shares are owned by institutional investors. 53.0% of Boston Omaha shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of FirstCash shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Boston Omaha has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FirstCash has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

FirstCash beats Boston Omaha on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Boston Omaha (NASDAQ:BOMN) and Hilltop (NYSE:HTH) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Boston Omaha and Hilltop, as reported by MarketBeat.

Boston Omaha presently has a consensus target price of $21.00, indicating a potential downside of 20.09%. Hilltop has a consensus target price of $29.00, indicating a potential downside of 12.01%. Given Hilltop's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hilltop is more favorable than Boston Omaha.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Boston Omaha and Hilltop's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Hilltop has higher revenue and earnings than Boston Omaha.

Profitability

This table compares Boston Omaha and Hilltop's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

85.8% of Boston Omaha shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.1% of Hilltop shares are owned by institutional investors. 53.0% of Boston Omaha shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 20.9% of Hilltop shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Boston Omaha has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hilltop has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Hilltop beats Boston Omaha on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Boston Omaha (NASDAQ:BOMN) and Broadstone Net Lease (NYSE:BNL) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Boston Omaha and Broadstone Net Lease, as reported by MarketBeat.

Boston Omaha presently has a consensus target price of $21.00, indicating a potential downside of 20.09%. Broadstone Net Lease has a consensus target price of $20.6667, indicating a potential upside of 11.29%. Given Broadstone Net Lease's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Broadstone Net Lease is more favorable than Boston Omaha.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Boston Omaha and Broadstone Net Lease's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Broadstone Net Lease has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Boston Omaha.

Profitability

This table compares Boston Omaha and Broadstone Net Lease's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

85.8% of Boston Omaha shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.1% of Broadstone Net Lease shares are owned by institutional investors. 53.0% of Boston Omaha shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Broadstone Net Lease beats Boston Omaha on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.