NASDAQ:CCMP

CMC Materials Competitors

$192.98
-3.61 (-1.84 %)
(As of 04/9/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$191.00
Now: $192.98
$196.41
50-Day Range
$156.15
MA: $173.41
$196.90
52-Week Range
$104.21
Now: $192.98
$198.60
Volume111,937 shs
Average Volume197,412 shs
Market Capitalization$5.63 billion
P/E Ratio39.95
Dividend Yield0.94%
Beta1.17

Competitors

CMC Materials (NASDAQ:CCMP) Vs. AMAT, LRCX, KLAC, ENTG, MKSI, and BRKS

Should you be buying CCMP stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "semiconductor equipment" are considered alternatives and competitors to CMC Materials, including Applied Materials (AMAT), Lam Research (LRCX), KLA (KLAC), Entegris (ENTG), MKS Instruments (MKSI), and Brooks Automation (BRKS).

Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) and CMC Materials (NASDAQ:CCMP) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings and valuation.

Dividends

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. CMC Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Applied Materials pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CMC Materials pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and CMC Materials has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. CMC Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Applied Materials and CMC Materials' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Applied Materials$17.20 billion7.41$3.62 billion$4.1733.31
CMC Materials$1.12 billion5.04$142.83 million$7.4725.83

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than CMC Materials. CMC Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Applied Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

78.8% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of CMC Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Applied Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of CMC Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Applied Materials and CMC Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Applied Materials041902.83
CMC Materials24302.11

Applied Materials currently has a consensus target price of $143.3750, indicating a potential upside of 3.21%. CMC Materials has a consensus target price of $155.25, indicating a potential downside of 19.55%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than CMC Materials.

Risk and Volatility

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CMC Materials has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Applied Materials and CMC Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Applied Materials21.04%40.65%18.07%
CMC Materials12.79%21.30%9.14%

Summary

Applied Materials beats CMC Materials on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lam Research (NASDAQ:LRCX) and CMC Materials (NASDAQ:CCMP) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Lam Research and CMC Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Lam Research23.60%55.82%20.06%
CMC Materials12.79%21.30%9.14%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Lam Research and CMC Materials' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lam Research$10.04 billion9.42$2.25 billion$15.9541.50
CMC Materials$1.12 billion5.04$142.83 million$7.4725.83

Lam Research has higher revenue and earnings than CMC Materials. CMC Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lam Research, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Lam Research has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CMC Materials has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Lam Research and CMC Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Lam Research041902.83
CMC Materials24302.11

Lam Research currently has a consensus target price of $518.1304, indicating a potential downside of 21.73%. CMC Materials has a consensus target price of $155.25, indicating a potential downside of 19.55%. Given CMC Materials' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CMC Materials is more favorable than Lam Research.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

84.0% of Lam Research shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of CMC Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Lam Research shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of CMC Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Lam Research pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. CMC Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Lam Research pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CMC Materials pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lam Research has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and CMC Materials has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. CMC Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Lam Research beats CMC Materials on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

KLA (NASDAQ:KLAC) and CMC Materials (NASDAQ:CCMP) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares KLA and CMC Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
KLA21.76%65.49%18.66%
CMC Materials12.79%21.30%9.14%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares KLA and CMC Materials' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
KLA$5.81 billion9.36$1.22 billion$10.3534.09
CMC Materials$1.12 billion5.04$142.83 million$7.4725.83

KLA has higher revenue and earnings than CMC Materials. CMC Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KLA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

KLA has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its share price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CMC Materials has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for KLA and CMC Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
KLA08802.50
CMC Materials24302.11

KLA presently has a consensus target price of $282.9333, suggesting a potential downside of 19.81%. CMC Materials has a consensus target price of $155.25, suggesting a potential downside of 19.55%. Given CMC Materials' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CMC Materials is more favorable than KLA.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

88.7% of KLA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of CMC Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of KLA shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of CMC Materials shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

KLA pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. CMC Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. KLA pays out 34.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CMC Materials pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KLA has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years and CMC Materials has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. KLA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

KLA beats CMC Materials on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Entegris (NASDAQ:ENTG) and CMC Materials (NASDAQ:CCMP) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Entegris and CMC Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Entegris15.03%26.54%12.06%
CMC Materials12.79%21.30%9.14%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Entegris and CMC Materials' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Entegris$1.59 billion10.32$254.86 million$1.9362.93
CMC Materials$1.12 billion5.04$142.83 million$7.4725.83

Entegris has higher revenue and earnings than CMC Materials. CMC Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Entegris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Entegris has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CMC Materials has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Entegris and CMC Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Entegris02502.71
CMC Materials24302.11

Entegris presently has a consensus target price of $100.7778, suggesting a potential downside of 17.02%. CMC Materials has a consensus target price of $155.25, suggesting a potential downside of 19.55%. Given Entegris' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Entegris is more favorable than CMC Materials.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

98.4% of Entegris shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of CMC Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Entegris shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of CMC Materials shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Entegris pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. CMC Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Entegris pays out 16.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CMC Materials pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Entegris has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and CMC Materials has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. CMC Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Entegris beats CMC Materials on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

MKS Instruments (NASDAQ:MKSI) and CMC Materials (NASDAQ:CCMP) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for MKS Instruments and CMC Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
MKS Instruments02802.80
CMC Materials24302.11

MKS Instruments presently has a consensus target price of $180.00, suggesting a potential downside of 5.99%. CMC Materials has a consensus target price of $155.25, suggesting a potential downside of 19.55%. Given MKS Instruments' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe MKS Instruments is more favorable than CMC Materials.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

94.0% of MKS Instruments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of CMC Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of MKS Instruments shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of CMC Materials shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares MKS Instruments and CMC Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
MKS Instruments12.78%16.49%9.74%
CMC Materials12.79%21.30%9.14%

Volatility and Risk

MKS Instruments has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its share price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CMC Materials has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

MKS Instruments pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. CMC Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. MKS Instruments pays out 17.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CMC Materials pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. MKS Instruments has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and CMC Materials has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. CMC Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares MKS Instruments and CMC Materials' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MKS Instruments$1.90 billion5.57$140.39 million$4.5242.36
CMC Materials$1.12 billion5.04$142.83 million$7.4725.83

CMC Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than MKS Instruments. CMC Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MKS Instruments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

MKS Instruments beats CMC Materials on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

CMC Materials (NASDAQ:CCMP) and Brooks Automation (NASDAQ:BRKS) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for CMC Materials and Brooks Automation, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CMC Materials24302.11
Brooks Automation02502.71

CMC Materials presently has a consensus target price of $155.25, suggesting a potential downside of 19.55%. Brooks Automation has a consensus target price of $81.8750, suggesting a potential downside of 14.45%. Given Brooks Automation's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Brooks Automation is more favorable than CMC Materials.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

87.2% of CMC Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.3% of Brooks Automation shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of CMC Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Brooks Automation shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares CMC Materials and Brooks Automation's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CMC Materials12.79%21.30%9.14%
Brooks Automation7.23%7.95%6.13%

Volatility & Risk

CMC Materials has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brooks Automation has a beta of 1.97, indicating that its stock price is 97% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

CMC Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Brooks Automation pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. CMC Materials pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brooks Automation pays out 31.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CMC Materials has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Brooks Automation has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CMC Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares CMC Materials and Brooks Automation's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CMC Materials$1.12 billion5.04$142.83 million$7.4725.83
Brooks Automation$897.27 million7.92$64.85 million$1.2675.95

CMC Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Brooks Automation. CMC Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brooks Automation, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

CMC Materials beats Brooks Automation on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.


CMC Materials Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Applied Materials logo
AMAT
Applied Materials
2.1$138.91-0.3%$127.47 billion$17.20 billion35.44Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Lam Research logo
LRCX
Lam Research
2.2$662.00-0.9%$94.61 billion$10.04 billion37.55
KLA logo
KLAC
KLA
2.2$352.85-0.3%$54.37 billion$5.81 billion42.93
Entegris logo
ENTG
Entegris
1.8$121.45-0.5%$16.43 billion$1.59 billion62.28Analyst Downgrade
Insider Selling
MKS Instruments logo
MKSI
MKS Instruments
2.1$191.46-1.9%$10.57 billion$1.90 billion38.22Unusual Options Activity
Brooks Automation logo
BRKS
Brooks Automation
1.9$95.70-2.8%$7.10 billion$897.27 million108.75
Amkor Technology logo
AMKR
Amkor Technology
1.9$25.05-2.0%$6.10 billion$4.05 billion19.57News Coverage
Advanced Energy Industries logo
AEIS
Advanced Energy Industries
1.8$118.45-0.1%$4.55 billion$788.95 million43.87Analyst Report
News Coverage
FormFactor logo
FORM
FormFactor
1.7$50.85-0.1%$3.95 billion$589.46 million51.36Analyst Report
Onto Innovation logo
ONTO
Onto Innovation
1.5$70.69-1.2%$3.46 billion$305.90 million-372.05Insider Selling
News Coverage
Cohu logo
COHU
Cohu
1.5$49.84-0.9%$2.40 billion$583.33 million-44.90News Coverage
Xperi logo
XPER
Xperi
1.6$22.33-1.2%$2.35 billion$280.07 million-38.50
Ultra Clean logo
UCTT
Ultra Clean
1.5$55.05-3.3%$2.24 billion$1.07 billion50.97
Axcelis Technologies logo
ACLS
Axcelis Technologies
1.7$44.33-3.1%$1.50 billion$342.96 million33.33Gap Down
Veeco Instruments logo
VECO
Veeco Instruments
1.4$21.28-1.3%$1.06 billion$419.35 million-24.74
Photronics logo
PLAB
Photronics
1.6$13.04-1.2%$826.54 million$609.69 million24.60News Coverage
PDF Solutions logo
PDFS
PDF Solutions
1.6$18.73-1.6%$695.73 million$85.58 million-74.92
AXT logo
AXTI
AXT
1.7$12.41-0.5%$522.30 million$83.26 million-413.53Insider Selling
Rubicon Technology logo
RBCN
Rubicon Technology
0.5$10.73-4.3%$25.98 million$3.53 million-44.69Gap Down
This page was last updated on 4/11/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.