CMC Materials Competitors

Applied Materials (NASDAQ:AMAT) and CMC Materials (NASDAQ:CCMP) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings and valuation.

Dividends

Applied Materials pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. CMC Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Applied Materials pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CMC Materials pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Applied Materials has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and CMC Materials has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. CMC Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Applied Materials and CMC Materials' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Applied Materials has higher revenue and earnings than CMC Materials. CMC Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Applied Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

78.8% of Applied Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of CMC Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Applied Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of CMC Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Applied Materials and CMC Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Applied Materials currently has a consensus target price of $143.3750, indicating a potential upside of 3.21%. CMC Materials has a consensus target price of $155.25, indicating a potential downside of 19.55%. Given Applied Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Applied Materials is more favorable than CMC Materials.

Risk and Volatility

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CMC Materials has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Applied Materials and CMC Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Applied Materials beats CMC Materials on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lam Research (NASDAQ:LRCX) and CMC Materials (NASDAQ:CCMP) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Lam Research and CMC Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Lam Research and CMC Materials' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Lam Research has higher revenue and earnings than CMC Materials. CMC Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lam Research, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Lam Research has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CMC Materials has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Lam Research and CMC Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Lam Research currently has a consensus target price of $518.1304, indicating a potential downside of 21.73%. CMC Materials has a consensus target price of $155.25, indicating a potential downside of 19.55%. Given CMC Materials' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CMC Materials is more favorable than Lam Research.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

84.0% of Lam Research shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of CMC Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Lam Research shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of CMC Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Lam Research pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. CMC Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Lam Research pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CMC Materials pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lam Research has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and CMC Materials has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. CMC Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Lam Research beats CMC Materials on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

KLA (NASDAQ:KLAC) and CMC Materials (NASDAQ:CCMP) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares KLA and CMC Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares KLA and CMC Materials' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

KLA has higher revenue and earnings than CMC Materials. CMC Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KLA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

KLA has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its share price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CMC Materials has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for KLA and CMC Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.

KLA presently has a consensus target price of $282.9333, suggesting a potential downside of 19.81%. CMC Materials has a consensus target price of $155.25, suggesting a potential downside of 19.55%. Given CMC Materials' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CMC Materials is more favorable than KLA.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

88.7% of KLA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of CMC Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of KLA shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of CMC Materials shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

KLA pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. CMC Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. KLA pays out 34.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CMC Materials pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. KLA has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years and CMC Materials has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. KLA is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

KLA beats CMC Materials on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Entegris (NASDAQ:ENTG) and CMC Materials (NASDAQ:CCMP) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Entegris and CMC Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Entegris and CMC Materials' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Entegris has higher revenue and earnings than CMC Materials. CMC Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Entegris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Entegris has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CMC Materials has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Entegris and CMC Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.

Entegris presently has a consensus target price of $100.7778, suggesting a potential downside of 17.02%. CMC Materials has a consensus target price of $155.25, suggesting a potential downside of 19.55%. Given Entegris' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Entegris is more favorable than CMC Materials.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

98.4% of Entegris shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of CMC Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Entegris shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of CMC Materials shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Entegris pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. CMC Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Entegris pays out 16.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CMC Materials pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Entegris has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and CMC Materials has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. CMC Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Entegris beats CMC Materials on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

MKS Instruments (NASDAQ:MKSI) and CMC Materials (NASDAQ:CCMP) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for MKS Instruments and CMC Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.

MKS Instruments presently has a consensus target price of $180.00, suggesting a potential downside of 5.99%. CMC Materials has a consensus target price of $155.25, suggesting a potential downside of 19.55%. Given MKS Instruments' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe MKS Instruments is more favorable than CMC Materials.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

94.0% of MKS Instruments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.2% of CMC Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of MKS Instruments shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of CMC Materials shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares MKS Instruments and CMC Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

MKS Instruments has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its share price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CMC Materials has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

MKS Instruments pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. CMC Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. MKS Instruments pays out 17.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CMC Materials pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. MKS Instruments has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and CMC Materials has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. CMC Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares MKS Instruments and CMC Materials' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

CMC Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than MKS Instruments. CMC Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MKS Instruments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

MKS Instruments beats CMC Materials on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

CMC Materials (NASDAQ:CCMP) and Brooks Automation (NASDAQ:BRKS) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for CMC Materials and Brooks Automation, as reported by MarketBeat.

CMC Materials presently has a consensus target price of $155.25, suggesting a potential downside of 19.55%. Brooks Automation has a consensus target price of $81.8750, suggesting a potential downside of 14.45%. Given Brooks Automation's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Brooks Automation is more favorable than CMC Materials.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

87.2% of CMC Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.3% of Brooks Automation shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of CMC Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Brooks Automation shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares CMC Materials and Brooks Automation's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

CMC Materials has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brooks Automation has a beta of 1.97, indicating that its stock price is 97% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

CMC Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Brooks Automation pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. CMC Materials pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brooks Automation pays out 31.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CMC Materials has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Brooks Automation has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CMC Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares CMC Materials and Brooks Automation's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

CMC Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Brooks Automation. CMC Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brooks Automation, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

CMC Materials beats Brooks Automation on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.