Centennial Resource Development Competitors

PDC Energy (NASDAQ:PDCE) and Centennial Resource Development (NASDAQ:CDEV) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk and earnings.

Volatility and Risk

PDC Energy has a beta of 3.28, suggesting that its stock price is 228% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Centennial Resource Development has a beta of 6.82, suggesting that its stock price is 582% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

53.7% of Centennial Resource Development shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of PDC Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 31.9% of Centennial Resource Development shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares PDC Energy and Centennial Resource Development's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Centennial Resource Development has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PDC Energy. Centennial Resource Development is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PDC Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares PDC Energy and Centennial Resource Development's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for PDC Energy and Centennial Resource Development, as provided by MarketBeat.

PDC Energy currently has a consensus price target of $27.6923, suggesting a potential downside of 20.47%. Centennial Resource Development has a consensus price target of $1.4357, suggesting a potential downside of 66.14%. Given PDC Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe PDC Energy is more favorable than Centennial Resource Development.

Summary

PDC Energy beats Centennial Resource Development on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

CNX Resources (NYSE:CNX) and Centennial Resource Development (NASDAQ:CDEV) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk and earnings.

Volatility and Risk

CNX Resources has a beta of 1.68, suggesting that its stock price is 68% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Centennial Resource Development has a beta of 6.82, suggesting that its stock price is 582% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares CNX Resources and Centennial Resource Development's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for CNX Resources and Centennial Resource Development, as provided by MarketBeat.

CNX Resources currently has a consensus price target of $14.6923, suggesting a potential upside of 6.31%. Centennial Resource Development has a consensus price target of $1.4357, suggesting a potential downside of 66.14%. Given CNX Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe CNX Resources is more favorable than Centennial Resource Development.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

89.0% of CNX Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.7% of Centennial Resource Development shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of CNX Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 31.9% of Centennial Resource Development shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares CNX Resources and Centennial Resource Development's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Centennial Resource Development has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CNX Resources. Centennial Resource Development is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CNX Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

CNX Resources beats Centennial Resource Development on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Centennial Resource Development (NASDAQ:CDEV) and Magnolia Oil & Gas (NYSE:MGY) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

53.7% of Centennial Resource Development shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.3% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.9% of Centennial Resource Development shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

Centennial Resource Development has a beta of 6.82, meaning that its share price is 582% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 2.72, meaning that its share price is 172% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Centennial Resource Development and Magnolia Oil & Gas' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Magnolia Oil & Gas has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Centennial Resource Development. Centennial Resource Development is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magnolia Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Centennial Resource Development and Magnolia Oil & Gas' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Centennial Resource Development and Magnolia Oil & Gas, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Centennial Resource Development presently has a consensus target price of $1.4357, suggesting a potential downside of 66.14%. Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus target price of $9.2083, suggesting a potential downside of 20.96%. Given Magnolia Oil & Gas' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Magnolia Oil & Gas is more favorable than Centennial Resource Development.

Summary

Magnolia Oil & Gas beats Centennial Resource Development on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Centennial Resource Development (NASDAQ:CDEV) and Southwestern Energy (NYSE:SWN) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

53.7% of Centennial Resource Development shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of Southwestern Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.9% of Centennial Resource Development shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Southwestern Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Centennial Resource Development has a beta of 6.82, meaning that its stock price is 582% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Southwestern Energy has a beta of 1.53, meaning that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Centennial Resource Development and Southwestern Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Southwestern Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Centennial Resource Development. Southwestern Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centennial Resource Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Centennial Resource Development and Southwestern Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Centennial Resource Development and Southwestern Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

Centennial Resource Development presently has a consensus target price of $1.4357, suggesting a potential downside of 66.14%. Southwestern Energy has a consensus target price of $3.6967, suggesting a potential downside of 10.28%. Given Southwestern Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Southwestern Energy is more favorable than Centennial Resource Development.

Summary

Southwestern Energy beats Centennial Resource Development on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Centennial Resource Development (NASDAQ:CDEV) and Antero Resources (NYSE:AR) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

53.7% of Centennial Resource Development shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.1% of Antero Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.9% of Centennial Resource Development shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Antero Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Centennial Resource Development has a beta of 6.82, meaning that its stock price is 582% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Antero Resources has a beta of 4.57, meaning that its stock price is 357% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Centennial Resource Development and Antero Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Centennial Resource Development has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Antero Resources. Antero Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centennial Resource Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Centennial Resource Development and Antero Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Centennial Resource Development and Antero Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

Centennial Resource Development presently has a consensus target price of $1.4357, suggesting a potential downside of 66.14%. Antero Resources has a consensus target price of $7.0750, suggesting a potential downside of 23.01%. Given Antero Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Antero Resources is more favorable than Centennial Resource Development.

Summary

Antero Resources beats Centennial Resource Development on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Centennial Resource Development (NASDAQ:CDEV) and Matador Resources (NYSE:MTDR) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

53.7% of Centennial Resource Development shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.7% of Matador Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.9% of Centennial Resource Development shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Matador Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Centennial Resource Development has a beta of 6.82, meaning that its stock price is 582% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Matador Resources has a beta of 4.8, meaning that its stock price is 380% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Centennial Resource Development and Matador Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Matador Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Centennial Resource Development. Matador Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centennial Resource Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Centennial Resource Development and Matador Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Centennial Resource Development and Matador Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

Centennial Resource Development presently has a consensus target price of $1.4357, suggesting a potential downside of 66.14%. Matador Resources has a consensus target price of $14.6250, suggesting a potential downside of 37.66%. Given Matador Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Matador Resources is more favorable than Centennial Resource Development.

Summary

Matador Resources beats Centennial Resource Development on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.