Falcon Minerals Competitors

Falcon Minerals (NASDAQ:FLMN) and Enerplus (NYSE:ERF) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

31.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.0% of Enerplus shares are held by institutional investors. 15.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Falcon Minerals and Enerplus' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Falcon Minerals has a beta of 1.78, meaning that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Enerplus has a beta of 3.18, meaning that its stock price is 218% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Falcon Minerals and Enerplus, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Falcon Minerals presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.17%. Enerplus has a consensus price target of $7.9722, indicating a potential upside of 45.74%. Given Enerplus' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Enerplus is more favorable than Falcon Minerals.

Dividends

Falcon Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Enerplus pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Falcon Minerals pays out 96.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enerplus pays out 8.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Falcon Minerals has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Enerplus has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Falcon Minerals and Enerplus' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Falcon Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Enerplus. Enerplus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Falcon Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Enerplus beats Falcon Minerals on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Falcon Minerals (NASDAQ:FLMN) and Comstock Resources (NYSE:CRK) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

31.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.0% of Comstock Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Comstock Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Falcon Minerals and Comstock Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Falcon Minerals has a beta of 1.78, suggesting that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Comstock Resources has a beta of 1.62, suggesting that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Falcon Minerals and Comstock Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Falcon Minerals presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.17%. Comstock Resources has a consensus price target of $6.76, indicating a potential upside of 29.01%. Given Comstock Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Comstock Resources is more favorable than Falcon Minerals.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Falcon Minerals and Comstock Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Comstock Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Falcon Minerals. Comstock Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Falcon Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Comstock Resources beats Falcon Minerals on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Falcon Minerals (NASDAQ:FLMN) and Centennial Resource Development (NASDAQ:CDEV) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

31.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.7% of Centennial Resource Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 31.9% of Centennial Resource Development shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Falcon Minerals and Centennial Resource Development's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Falcon Minerals has a beta of 1.78, suggesting that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Centennial Resource Development has a beta of 6.82, suggesting that its stock price is 582% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Falcon Minerals and Centennial Resource Development, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Falcon Minerals presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.17%. Centennial Resource Development has a consensus price target of $1.4357, indicating a potential downside of 66.14%. Given Falcon Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Falcon Minerals is more favorable than Centennial Resource Development.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Falcon Minerals and Centennial Resource Development's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Centennial Resource Development has higher revenue and earnings than Falcon Minerals. Falcon Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centennial Resource Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Falcon Minerals beats Centennial Resource Development on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Falcon Minerals (NASDAQ:FLMN) and Kosmos Energy (NYSE:KOS) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

31.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Kosmos Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Kosmos Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Falcon Minerals and Kosmos Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Falcon Minerals has a beta of 1.78, suggesting that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kosmos Energy has a beta of 3.77, suggesting that its stock price is 277% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Falcon Minerals and Kosmos Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Falcon Minerals presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.17%. Kosmos Energy has a consensus price target of $2.6150, indicating a potential downside of 5.94%. Given Falcon Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Falcon Minerals is more favorable than Kosmos Energy.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Falcon Minerals and Kosmos Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Falcon Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kosmos Energy. Kosmos Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Falcon Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Falcon Minerals beats Kosmos Energy on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Falcon Minerals (NASDAQ:FLMN) and Vermilion Energy (NYSE:VET) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Falcon Minerals and Vermilion Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Vermilion Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Falcon Minerals. Falcon Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vermilion Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Falcon Minerals has a beta of 1.78, suggesting that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Vermilion Energy has a beta of 3, suggesting that its stock price is 200% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Falcon Minerals and Vermilion Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

31.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.6% of Vermilion Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Falcon Minerals and Vermilion Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Falcon Minerals presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.17%. Vermilion Energy has a consensus price target of $9.2778, indicating a potential upside of 33.49%. Given Vermilion Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Vermilion Energy is more favorable than Falcon Minerals.

Summary

Falcon Minerals beats Vermilion Energy on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Falcon Minerals (NASDAQ:FLMN) and QEP Resources (NYSE:QEP) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and earnings.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Falcon Minerals and QEP Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Falcon Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than QEP Resources.

Volatility and Risk

Falcon Minerals has a beta of 1.78, suggesting that its share price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, QEP Resources has a beta of 5.24, suggesting that its share price is 424% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Falcon Minerals and QEP Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

31.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.6% of QEP Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 15.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of QEP Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Falcon Minerals and QEP Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

Falcon Minerals currently has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.17%. QEP Resources has a consensus price target of $2.08, indicating a potential downside of 49.02%. Given Falcon Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Falcon Minerals is more favorable than QEP Resources.

Summary

Falcon Minerals beats QEP Resources on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.