NASDAQ:FLMN

Falcon Minerals Competitors

$4.58
+0.05 (+1.10 %)
(As of 04/9/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$4.45
Now: $4.58
$4.62
50-Day Range
$3.95
MA: $4.44
$4.89
52-Week Range
$1.82
Now: $4.58
$5.03
Volume120,026 shs
Average Volume315,990 shs
Market Capitalization$394.37 million
P/E Ratio45.80
Dividend Yield6.62%
Beta1.78

Competitors

Falcon Minerals (NASDAQ:FLMN) Vs. ERF, CRK, CDEV, KOS, VET, and QEP

Should you be buying FLMN stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "crude petroleum & natural gas" are considered alternatives and competitors to Falcon Minerals, including Enerplus (ERF), Comstock Resources (CRK), Centennial Resource Development (CDEV), Kosmos Energy (KOS), Vermilion Energy (VET), and QEP Resources (QEP).

Falcon Minerals (NASDAQ:FLMN) and Enerplus (NYSE:ERF) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

31.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.0% of Enerplus shares are held by institutional investors. 15.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Falcon Minerals and Enerplus' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Falcon Minerals10.72%1.90%1.60%
Enerplus-130.21%2.91%1.54%

Risk & Volatility

Falcon Minerals has a beta of 1.78, meaning that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Enerplus has a beta of 3.18, meaning that its stock price is 218% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Falcon Minerals and Enerplus, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Falcon Minerals02202.50
Enerplus02902.82

Falcon Minerals presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.17%. Enerplus has a consensus price target of $7.9722, indicating a potential upside of 45.74%. Given Enerplus' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Enerplus is more favorable than Falcon Minerals.

Dividends

Falcon Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Enerplus pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Falcon Minerals pays out 96.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Enerplus pays out 8.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Falcon Minerals has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Enerplus has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Falcon Minerals and Enerplus' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Falcon Minerals$68.46 million5.76$14.35 million$0.3114.77
Enerplus$945.62 million1.48$-195,730,000.00$0.796.92

Falcon Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Enerplus. Enerplus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Falcon Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Enerplus beats Falcon Minerals on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Falcon Minerals (NASDAQ:FLMN) and Comstock Resources (NYSE:CRK) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

31.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.0% of Comstock Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Comstock Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Falcon Minerals and Comstock Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Falcon Minerals10.72%1.90%1.60%
Comstock Resources-9.08%7.58%1.99%

Volatility and Risk

Falcon Minerals has a beta of 1.78, suggesting that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Comstock Resources has a beta of 1.62, suggesting that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Falcon Minerals and Comstock Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Falcon Minerals02202.50
Comstock Resources06702.54

Falcon Minerals presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.17%. Comstock Resources has a consensus price target of $6.76, indicating a potential upside of 29.01%. Given Comstock Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Comstock Resources is more favorable than Falcon Minerals.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Falcon Minerals and Comstock Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Falcon Minerals$68.46 million5.76$14.35 million$0.3114.77
Comstock Resources$768.69 million1.58$96.89 million$0.776.81

Comstock Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Falcon Minerals. Comstock Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Falcon Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Comstock Resources beats Falcon Minerals on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Falcon Minerals (NASDAQ:FLMN) and Centennial Resource Development (NASDAQ:CDEV) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

31.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.7% of Centennial Resource Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 31.9% of Centennial Resource Development shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Falcon Minerals and Centennial Resource Development's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Falcon Minerals10.72%1.90%1.60%
Centennial Resource Development-84.87%-6.02%-4.11%

Volatility and Risk

Falcon Minerals has a beta of 1.78, suggesting that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Centennial Resource Development has a beta of 6.82, suggesting that its stock price is 582% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Falcon Minerals and Centennial Resource Development, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Falcon Minerals02202.50
Centennial Resource Development46201.83

Falcon Minerals presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.17%. Centennial Resource Development has a consensus price target of $1.4357, indicating a potential downside of 66.14%. Given Falcon Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Falcon Minerals is more favorable than Centennial Resource Development.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Falcon Minerals and Centennial Resource Development's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Falcon Minerals$68.46 million5.76$14.35 million$0.3114.77
Centennial Resource Development$944.33 million1.25$15.80 million$0.1922.32

Centennial Resource Development has higher revenue and earnings than Falcon Minerals. Falcon Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centennial Resource Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Falcon Minerals beats Centennial Resource Development on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Falcon Minerals (NASDAQ:FLMN) and Kosmos Energy (NYSE:KOS) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

31.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Kosmos Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Kosmos Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Falcon Minerals and Kosmos Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Falcon Minerals10.72%1.90%1.60%
Kosmos Energy-45.99%-41.86%-5.97%

Volatility and Risk

Falcon Minerals has a beta of 1.78, suggesting that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kosmos Energy has a beta of 3.77, suggesting that its stock price is 277% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Falcon Minerals and Kosmos Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Falcon Minerals02202.50
Kosmos Energy06302.33

Falcon Minerals presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.17%. Kosmos Energy has a consensus price target of $2.6150, indicating a potential downside of 5.94%. Given Falcon Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Falcon Minerals is more favorable than Kosmos Energy.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Falcon Minerals and Kosmos Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Falcon Minerals$68.46 million5.76$14.35 million$0.3114.77
Kosmos Energy$1.51 billion0.75$-55,780,000.00($0.05)-55.60

Falcon Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kosmos Energy. Kosmos Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Falcon Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Falcon Minerals beats Kosmos Energy on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Falcon Minerals (NASDAQ:FLMN) and Vermilion Energy (NYSE:VET) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Falcon Minerals and Vermilion Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Falcon Minerals$68.46 million5.76$14.35 million$0.3114.77
Vermilion Energy$1.27 billion0.87$24.72 million$0.3321.06

Vermilion Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Falcon Minerals. Falcon Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vermilion Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Falcon Minerals has a beta of 1.78, suggesting that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Vermilion Energy has a beta of 3, suggesting that its stock price is 200% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Falcon Minerals and Vermilion Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Falcon Minerals10.72%1.90%1.60%
Vermilion Energy-121.97%-11.06%-3.32%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

31.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.6% of Vermilion Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Falcon Minerals and Vermilion Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Falcon Minerals02202.50
Vermilion Energy17302.18

Falcon Minerals presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.17%. Vermilion Energy has a consensus price target of $9.2778, indicating a potential upside of 33.49%. Given Vermilion Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Vermilion Energy is more favorable than Falcon Minerals.

Summary

Falcon Minerals beats Vermilion Energy on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Falcon Minerals (NASDAQ:FLMN) and QEP Resources (NYSE:QEP) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and earnings.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Falcon Minerals and QEP Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Falcon Minerals$68.46 million5.76$14.35 million$0.3114.77
QEP Resources$1.21 billion0.82$-97,300,000.00N/AN/A

Falcon Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than QEP Resources.

Volatility and Risk

Falcon Minerals has a beta of 1.78, suggesting that its share price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, QEP Resources has a beta of 5.24, suggesting that its share price is 424% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Falcon Minerals and QEP Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Falcon Minerals10.72%1.90%1.60%
QEP Resources2.77%1.39%0.71%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

31.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.6% of QEP Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 15.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of QEP Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Falcon Minerals and QEP Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Falcon Minerals02202.50
QEP Resources14202.14

Falcon Minerals currently has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.17%. QEP Resources has a consensus price target of $2.08, indicating a potential downside of 49.02%. Given Falcon Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Falcon Minerals is more favorable than QEP Resources.

Summary

Falcon Minerals beats QEP Resources on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.


Falcon Minerals Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Enerplus logo
ERF
Enerplus
2.2$5.47+4.2%$1.40 billion$945.62 million-1.44Analyst Report
News Coverage
Gap Up
Comstock Resources logo
CRK
Comstock Resources
1.6$5.24+0.4%$1.22 billion$768.69 million-10.08
Centennial Resource Development logo
CDEV
Centennial Resource Development
1.0$4.24+1.2%$1.18 billion$944.33 million-1.99
Kosmos Energy logo
KOS
Kosmos Energy
1.2$2.78+7.6%$1.13 billion$1.51 billion-2.48Gap Down
Vermilion Energy logo
VET
Vermilion Energy
1.6$6.95+0.1%$1.10 billion$1.27 billion-1.00News Coverage
QEP Resources logo
QEP
QEP Resources
1.0$4.08+0.0%$989.67 million$1.21 billion34.00
GeoPark logo
GPRK
GeoPark
1.8$15.79+6.0%$963.66 million$628.91 million-8.40Gap Down
Talos Energy logo
TALO
Talos Energy
1.8$11.73+0.3%$958.42 million$927.62 million-69.00
Brigham Minerals logo
MNRL
Brigham Minerals
1.9$15.27+0.6%$866.21 million$101.51 million-763.50Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Par Pacific logo
PARR
Par Pacific
1.3$14.78+3.4%$798.25 million$5.40 billion-3.26Analyst Upgrade
Gap Down
Tellurian logo
TELL
Tellurian
1.4$2.06+0.5%$796.37 million$28.77 million-2.10
Bonanza Creek Energy logo
BCEI
Bonanza Creek Energy
1.3$33.25+5.0%$692.90 million$313.22 million17.05Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Gap Down
Kimbell Royalty Partners logo
KRP
Kimbell Royalty Partners
1.8$10.00+1.4%$596.98 million$108.22 million-1.83
Earthstone Energy logo
ESTE
Earthstone Energy
1.2$7.25+2.1%$566.15 million$191.26 million-29.00Insider Selling
News Coverage
W&T Offshore logo
WTI
W&T Offshore
1.4$3.45+3.5%$490.95 million$534.90 million3.38
Dorchester Minerals logo
DMLP
Dorchester Minerals
1.0$13.96+1.1%$484.13 million$78.80 million17.67
Berry logo
BRY
Berry
1.4$5.58+0.7%$449.03 million$559.41 million-2.15
Laredo Petroleum logo
LPI
Laredo Petroleum
0.9$33.99+5.1%$438.47 million$837.28 million-0.50Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Down
Hess Midstream logo
HESM
Hess Midstream
1.9$22.80+1.9%$411.04 million$848.30 million18.54Analyst Upgrade
Gap Down
TETRA Technologies logo
TTI
TETRA Technologies
1.2$2.63+5.7%$333.05 million$1.04 billion-2.25Gap Up
Torchlight Energy Resources logo
TRCH
Torchlight Energy Resources
0.3N/AN/A$271.74 million$750,000.00-9.35
Vista Oil & Gas logo
VIST
Vista Oil & Gas
0.6$2.77+1.4%$241.83 million$415.98 million-1.81Analyst Upgrade
Penn Virginia logo
PVAC
Penn Virginia
1.2$12.76+2.3%$194.81 million$471.22 million-1.13Gap Down
BATL
Battalion Oil
0.3$11.86+0.0%$192.93 millionN/A-1.09
SandRidge Energy logo
SD
SandRidge Energy
0.5$3.72+1.9%$134.42 million$266.85 million-0.25News Coverage
VAALCO Energy logo
EGY
VAALCO Energy
1.3$2.25+1.8%$129.74 million$84.52 million-3.00
TransGlobe Energy logo
TGA
TransGlobe Energy
1.0$1.47+2.0%$106.64 million$278.93 million-1.29
AMPY
Amplify Energy
0.9$2.56+4.3%$96.40 million$275.58 million-0.21
PNRG
PrimeEnergy Resources
0.8$47.85+3.2%$95.41 million$104.82 million0.00
SilverBow Resources logo
SBOW
SilverBow Resources
1.5$7.78+2.4%$94.48 million$288.63 million-0.30News Coverage
EPSN
Epsilon Energy
0.6$3.81+0.3%$91.39 million$26.69 million63.51
PermRock Royalty Trust logo
PRT
PermRock Royalty Trust
1.3$5.43+1.1%$66.02 million$10.44 million0.00
MV Oil Trust logo
MVO
MV Oil Trust
1.0$5.44+3.3%$62.56 million$12.99 million5.85Dividend Increase
High Trading Volume
VOC Energy Trust logo
VOC
VOC Energy Trust
0.9$3.46+1.4%$58.82 million$9.21 million6.41
PHX Minerals logo
PHX
PHX Minerals
1.7$2.62+8.8%$58.78 million$28.97 million-1.90Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Gap Down
PVL
Permianville Royalty Trust
0.8$1.43+0.0%$47.13 million$44.96 million6.49
Abraxas Petroleum logo
AXAS
Abraxas Petroleum
0.8$2.97+1.7%$24.96 million$129.15 million0.00
HighPoint Resources logo
HPR
HighPoint Resources
1.5$4.73+15.6%$20.36 million$452.66 million-0.02Gap Down
U.S. Energy logo
USEG
U.S. Energy
0.8$4.20+0.5%$19.64 million$6.57 million0.00
Gulfport Energy logo
GPOR
Gulfport Energy
2.2$0.05+0.0%$8.38 million$1.35 billion0.00News Coverage
Sundance Energy logo
SNDE
Sundance Energy
1.3$0.31+0.0%$2.13 million$203.58 million-0.53News Coverage
Gap Down
This page was last updated on 4/10/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.