FinTech Acquisition Corp. III Competitors

FinTech Acquisition Corp. III (NASDAQ:FTAC) and GS Acquisition Holdings Corp II (NYSE:GSAH) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for FinTech Acquisition Corp. III and GS Acquisition Holdings Corp II, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares FinTech Acquisition Corp. III and GS Acquisition Holdings Corp II's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

50.0% of FinTech Acquisition Corp. III shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of FinTech Acquisition Corp. III shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares FinTech Acquisition Corp. III and GS Acquisition Holdings Corp II's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

FinTech Acquisition Corp. III beats GS Acquisition Holdings Corp II on 4 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

FinTech Acquisition Corp. III (NASDAQ:FTAC) and Bain Capital Specialty Finance (NYSE:BCSF) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, earnings and profitability.

Volatility and Risk

FinTech Acquisition Corp. III has a beta of 0.02, indicating that its share price is 98% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bain Capital Specialty Finance has a beta of 1.47, indicating that its share price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for FinTech Acquisition Corp. III and Bain Capital Specialty Finance, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Bain Capital Specialty Finance has a consensus target price of $12.1429, indicating a potential upside of 1.02%. Given Bain Capital Specialty Finance's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Bain Capital Specialty Finance is more favorable than FinTech Acquisition Corp. III.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares FinTech Acquisition Corp. III and Bain Capital Specialty Finance's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Bain Capital Specialty Finance has higher revenue and earnings than FinTech Acquisition Corp. III. Bain Capital Specialty Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FinTech Acquisition Corp. III, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

50.0% of FinTech Acquisition Corp. III shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.2% of Bain Capital Specialty Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of FinTech Acquisition Corp. III shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Bain Capital Specialty Finance shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares FinTech Acquisition Corp. III and Bain Capital Specialty Finance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Bain Capital Specialty Finance beats FinTech Acquisition Corp. III on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

FinTech Acquisition Corp. III (NASDAQ:FTAC) and Haymaker Acquisition Corp. II (NASDAQ:HYAC) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, earnings and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for FinTech Acquisition Corp. III and Haymaker Acquisition Corp. II, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Profitability

This table compares FinTech Acquisition Corp. III and Haymaker Acquisition Corp. II's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

FinTech Acquisition Corp. III has a beta of 0.02, indicating that its share price is 98% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Haymaker Acquisition Corp. II has a beta of 0.13, indicating that its share price is 87% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares FinTech Acquisition Corp. III and Haymaker Acquisition Corp. II's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

50.0% of FinTech Acquisition Corp. III shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.6% of Haymaker Acquisition Corp. II shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of FinTech Acquisition Corp. III shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

FinTech Acquisition Corp. III beats Haymaker Acquisition Corp. II on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

FinTech Acquisition Corp. III (NASDAQ:FTAC) and Global Cord Blood (NYSE:CO) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for FinTech Acquisition Corp. III and Global Cord Blood, as reported by MarketBeat.

Profitability

This table compares FinTech Acquisition Corp. III and Global Cord Blood's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

FinTech Acquisition Corp. III has a beta of 0.02, suggesting that its share price is 98% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Global Cord Blood has a beta of 0.44, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares FinTech Acquisition Corp. III and Global Cord Blood's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Global Cord Blood has higher revenue and earnings than FinTech Acquisition Corp. III.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

50.0% of FinTech Acquisition Corp. III shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of FinTech Acquisition Corp. III shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Global Cord Blood beats FinTech Acquisition Corp. III on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

FinTech Acquisition Corp. III (NASDAQ:FTAC) and Crescent Capital BDC (NASDAQ:CCAP) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

50.0% of FinTech Acquisition Corp. III shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.1% of Crescent Capital BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of FinTech Acquisition Corp. III shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Crescent Capital BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for FinTech Acquisition Corp. III and Crescent Capital BDC, as reported by MarketBeat.

Crescent Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.41%. Given Crescent Capital BDC's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Crescent Capital BDC is more favorable than FinTech Acquisition Corp. III.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares FinTech Acquisition Corp. III and Crescent Capital BDC's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Crescent Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than FinTech Acquisition Corp. III. Crescent Capital BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FinTech Acquisition Corp. III, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares FinTech Acquisition Corp. III and Crescent Capital BDC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Crescent Capital BDC beats FinTech Acquisition Corp. III on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

FinTech Acquisition Corp. III (NASDAQ:FTAC) and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives (NASDAQ:IEA) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

50.0% of FinTech Acquisition Corp. III shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.0% of Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of FinTech Acquisition Corp. III shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

FinTech Acquisition Corp. III has a beta of 0.02, meaning that its share price is 98% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for FinTech Acquisition Corp. III and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives has a consensus target price of $13.00, indicating a potential downside of 0.99%. Given Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives is more favorable than FinTech Acquisition Corp. III.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares FinTech Acquisition Corp. III and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives has higher revenue and earnings than FinTech Acquisition Corp. III. Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FinTech Acquisition Corp. III, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares FinTech Acquisition Corp. III and Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Infrastructure and Energy Alternatives beats FinTech Acquisition Corp. III on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.