Arcimoto Competitors

Adient (NYSE:ADNT) and Arcimoto (NASDAQ:FUV) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Adient and Arcimoto's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Arcimoto has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Adient. Adient is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arcimoto, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

84.9% of Adient shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Arcimoto shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Adient shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 34.7% of Arcimoto shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Adient has a beta of 3.3, indicating that its share price is 230% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Arcimoto has a beta of 2.92, indicating that its share price is 192% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Adient and Arcimoto, as reported by MarketBeat.

Adient currently has a consensus target price of $33.50, indicating a potential upside of 2.23%. Arcimoto has a consensus target price of $9.6667, indicating a potential downside of 60.07%. Given Adient's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Adient is more favorable than Arcimoto.

Profitability

This table compares Adient and Arcimoto's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Adient beats Arcimoto on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Arcimoto (NASDAQ:FUV) and Hyliion (NYSE:HYLN) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

10.1% of Arcimoto shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.0% of Hyliion shares are owned by institutional investors. 34.7% of Arcimoto shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Arcimoto has a beta of 2.92, suggesting that its share price is 192% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hyliion has a beta of 1, suggesting that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Arcimoto and Hyliion's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Hyliion has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Arcimoto.

Profitability

This table compares Arcimoto and Hyliion's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Arcimoto and Hyliion, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Arcimoto currently has a consensus price target of $9.6667, indicating a potential downside of 60.07%. Hyliion has a consensus price target of $23.00, indicating a potential upside of 18.37%. Given Hyliion's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hyliion is more favorable than Arcimoto.

Summary

Arcimoto beats Hyliion on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Arcimoto (NASDAQ:FUV) and Dana (NYSE:DAN) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

10.1% of Arcimoto shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.3% of Dana shares are held by institutional investors. 34.7% of Arcimoto shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Dana shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Arcimoto has a beta of 2.92, suggesting that its stock price is 192% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dana has a beta of 2.6, suggesting that its stock price is 160% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Arcimoto and Dana's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Dana has higher revenue and earnings than Arcimoto. Arcimoto is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dana, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Arcimoto and Dana's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Arcimoto and Dana, as provided by MarketBeat.

Arcimoto presently has a consensus price target of $9.6667, indicating a potential downside of 60.07%. Dana has a consensus price target of $20.25, indicating a potential downside of 1.41%. Given Dana's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Dana is more favorable than Arcimoto.

Summary

Dana beats Arcimoto on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Veoneer (NYSE:VNE) and Arcimoto (NASDAQ:FUV) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Veoneer and Arcimoto's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Arcimoto has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Veoneer. Arcimoto is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Veoneer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Veoneer and Arcimoto's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Veoneer and Arcimoto, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Veoneer presently has a consensus price target of $16.8889, indicating a potential downside of 34.44%. Arcimoto has a consensus price target of $9.6667, indicating a potential downside of 60.07%. Given Veoneer's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Veoneer is more favorable than Arcimoto.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

26.3% of Veoneer shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Arcimoto shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Veoneer shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 34.7% of Arcimoto shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Veoneer has a beta of 2.66, suggesting that its share price is 166% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Arcimoto has a beta of 2.92, suggesting that its share price is 192% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Arcimoto (NASDAQ:FUV) and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber (NASDAQ:GT) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Arcimoto and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber, as provided by MarketBeat.

Arcimoto presently has a consensus target price of $9.6667, indicating a potential downside of 60.07%. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber has a consensus target price of $9.6111, indicating a potential downside of 12.86%. Given The Goodyear Tire & Rubber's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe The Goodyear Tire & Rubber is more favorable than Arcimoto.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Arcimoto and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Arcimoto has higher earnings, but lower revenue than The Goodyear Tire & Rubber. Arcimoto is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Goodyear Tire & Rubber, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Arcimoto has a beta of 2.92, meaning that its share price is 192% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber has a beta of 2.17, meaning that its share price is 117% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

10.1% of Arcimoto shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.0% of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber shares are held by institutional investors. 34.7% of Arcimoto shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Arcimoto and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber beats Arcimoto on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Arcimoto (NASDAQ:FUV) and SPX (NYSE:SPXC) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Arcimoto and SPX's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

10.1% of Arcimoto shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of SPX shares are owned by institutional investors. 34.7% of Arcimoto shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of SPX shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Arcimoto and SPX, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Arcimoto currently has a consensus target price of $9.6667, indicating a potential downside of 60.07%. SPX has a consensus target price of $54.75, indicating a potential downside of 3.51%. Given SPX's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SPX is more favorable than Arcimoto.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Arcimoto and SPX's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

SPX has higher revenue and earnings than Arcimoto. Arcimoto is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SPX, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Arcimoto has a beta of 2.92, meaning that its stock price is 192% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SPX has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

SPX beats Arcimoto on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.