SPI Energy Competitors

SPI Energy (NASDAQ:SPI) and Atomera (NASDAQ:ATOM) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

6.3% of SPI Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.5% of Atomera shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.0% of Atomera shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

SPI Energy has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Atomera has a beta of 1.91, suggesting that its share price is 91% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares SPI Energy and Atomera's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares SPI Energy and Atomera's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Atomera has lower revenue, but higher earnings than SPI Energy.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for SPI Energy and Atomera, as provided by MarketBeat.

Summary

Atomera beats SPI Energy on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

MagnaChip Semiconductor (NYSE:MX) and SPI Energy (NASDAQ:SPI) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and dividends.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares MagnaChip Semiconductor and SPI Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

SPI Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than MagnaChip Semiconductor.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for MagnaChip Semiconductor and SPI Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

MagnaChip Semiconductor presently has a consensus target price of $26.25, suggesting a potential upside of 37.94%. Given MagnaChip Semiconductor's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe MagnaChip Semiconductor is more favorable than SPI Energy.

Risk and Volatility

MagnaChip Semiconductor has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SPI Energy has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

97.2% of MagnaChip Semiconductor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.3% of SPI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 5.2% of MagnaChip Semiconductor shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares MagnaChip Semiconductor and SPI Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

MagnaChip Semiconductor beats SPI Energy on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ebang International (NASDAQ:EBON) and SPI Energy (NASDAQ:SPI) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and dividends.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Ebang International and SPI Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

SPI Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ebang International.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Ebang International and SPI Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.4% of Ebang International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.3% of SPI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Ebang International and SPI Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

NeoPhotonics (NYSE:NPTN) and SPI Energy (NASDAQ:SPI) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for NeoPhotonics and SPI Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

NeoPhotonics presently has a consensus target price of $11.50, suggesting a potential downside of 6.43%. Given NeoPhotonics' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe NeoPhotonics is more favorable than SPI Energy.

Risk and Volatility

NeoPhotonics has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SPI Energy has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares NeoPhotonics and SPI Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares NeoPhotonics and SPI Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

SPI Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NeoPhotonics.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

80.9% of NeoPhotonics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.3% of SPI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 4.7% of NeoPhotonics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

NeoPhotonics beats SPI Energy on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

SPI Energy (NASDAQ:SPI) and AXT (NASDAQ:AXTI) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for SPI Energy and AXT, as reported by MarketBeat.

AXT has a consensus price target of $16.00, suggesting a potential upside of 13.48%. Given AXT's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe AXT is more favorable than SPI Energy.

Volatility & Risk

SPI Energy has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AXT has a beta of 2.29, meaning that its share price is 129% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares SPI Energy and AXT's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares SPI Energy and AXT's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

AXT has lower revenue, but higher earnings than SPI Energy.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

6.3% of SPI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.8% of AXT shares are held by institutional investors. 8.1% of AXT shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

AXT beats SPI Energy on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

SPI Energy (NASDAQ:SPI) and ReneSola (NYSE:SOL) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for SPI Energy and ReneSola, as reported by MarketBeat.

ReneSola has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 25.19%. Given ReneSola's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ReneSola is more favorable than SPI Energy.

Volatility & Risk

SPI Energy has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ReneSola has a beta of 2.62, meaning that its share price is 162% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares SPI Energy and ReneSola's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares SPI Energy and ReneSola's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

ReneSola has higher revenue and earnings than SPI Energy.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

6.3% of SPI Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.4% of ReneSola shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

ReneSola beats SPI Energy on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.