Zynga Competitors

Zynga (NASDAQ:ZNGA) and Bilibili (NASDAQ:BILI) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Zynga has a beta of 0.26, meaning that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bilibili has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Zynga and Bilibili's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Zynga and Bilibili, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Zynga presently has a consensus target price of $11.6184, suggesting a potential upside of 8.79%. Bilibili has a consensus target price of $66.0455, suggesting a potential downside of 35.88%. Given Zynga's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Zynga is more favorable than Bilibili.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

69.6% of Zynga shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.1% of Bilibili shares are held by institutional investors. 9.4% of Zynga shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Zynga and Bilibili's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Zynga has higher revenue and earnings than Bilibili. Bilibili is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zynga, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Zynga beats Bilibili on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Zynga (NASDAQ:ZNGA) and Verisk Analytics (NASDAQ:VRSK) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Risk & Volatility

Zynga has a beta of 0.26, meaning that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Verisk Analytics has a beta of 0.67, meaning that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Zynga and Verisk Analytics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Zynga and Verisk Analytics, as provided by MarketBeat.

Zynga presently has a consensus price target of $11.6184, suggesting a potential upside of 8.79%. Verisk Analytics has a consensus price target of $195.4545, suggesting a potential upside of 7.10%. Given Zynga's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Zynga is more favorable than Verisk Analytics.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

69.6% of Zynga shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.2% of Verisk Analytics shares are held by institutional investors. 9.4% of Zynga shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Verisk Analytics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Zynga and Verisk Analytics' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Verisk Analytics has higher revenue and earnings than Zynga. Zynga is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Verisk Analytics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Verisk Analytics beats Zynga on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Zynga (NASDAQ:ZNGA) and RingCentral (NYSE:RNG) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Risk & Volatility

Zynga has a beta of 0.26, meaning that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RingCentral has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Zynga and RingCentral's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Zynga and RingCentral, as provided by MarketBeat.

Zynga presently has a consensus price target of $11.6184, suggesting a potential upside of 8.79%. RingCentral has a consensus price target of $431.7727, suggesting a potential upside of 35.76%. Given RingCentral's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe RingCentral is more favorable than Zynga.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

69.6% of Zynga shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.3% of RingCentral shares are held by institutional investors. 9.4% of Zynga shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.0% of RingCentral shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Zynga and RingCentral's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Zynga has higher revenue and earnings than RingCentral. RingCentral is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zynga, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

RingCentral beats Zynga on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Zynga (NASDAQ:ZNGA) and StoneCo (NASDAQ:STNE) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Risk & Volatility

Zynga has a beta of 0.26, meaning that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, StoneCo has a beta of 2.4, meaning that its stock price is 140% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Zynga and StoneCo's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Zynga and StoneCo, as provided by MarketBeat.

Zynga presently has a consensus price target of $11.6184, suggesting a potential upside of 8.79%. StoneCo has a consensus price target of $66.20, suggesting a potential downside of 2.27%. Given Zynga's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Zynga is more favorable than StoneCo.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

69.6% of Zynga shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.5% of StoneCo shares are held by institutional investors. 9.4% of Zynga shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Zynga and StoneCo's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

StoneCo has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Zynga. Zynga is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than StoneCo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

StoneCo beats Zynga on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Zynga (NASDAQ:ZNGA) and Zendesk (NYSE:ZEN) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Zynga and Zendesk, as provided by MarketBeat.

Zynga presently has a consensus price target of $11.6184, suggesting a potential upside of 8.79%. Zendesk has a consensus price target of $143.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.30%. Given Zynga's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Zynga is more favorable than Zendesk.

Risk & Volatility

Zynga has a beta of 0.26, meaning that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Zendesk has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

69.6% of Zynga shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.4% of Zendesk shares are held by institutional investors. 9.4% of Zynga shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Zendesk shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Zynga and Zendesk's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Zynga and Zendesk's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Zynga has higher revenue and earnings than Zendesk. Zynga is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zendesk, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Zynga beats Zendesk on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

GoodRx (NASDAQ:GDRX) and Zynga (NASDAQ:ZNGA) are both large-cap medical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, valuation and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for GoodRx and Zynga, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

GoodRx presently has a consensus price target of $52.3571, indicating a potential upside of 28.93%. Zynga has a consensus price target of $11.6184, indicating a potential upside of 8.79%. Given GoodRx's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe GoodRx is more favorable than Zynga.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

43.4% of GoodRx shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.6% of Zynga shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.4% of Zynga shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares GoodRx and Zynga's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares GoodRx and Zynga's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

GoodRx has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Zynga.

Summary

GoodRx beats Zynga on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.