Atomera (ATOM) Competitors

Atomera has a net margin of 0.00% compared to JinkoSolar's net margin of -5.62%. JinkoSolar's return on equity of -9.52% beat Atomera's return on equity.

In the previous week, Atomera had 9 more articles in the media than JinkoSolar. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Atomera and 6 mentions for JinkoSolar. JinkoSolar's average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Atomera's score of 0.02 indicating that JinkoSolar is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

JinkoSolar has a consensus target price of $24.13, indicating a potential upside of 3.55%. Given JinkoSolar's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe JinkoSolar is more favorable than Atomera.

Atomera has higher earnings, but lower revenue than JinkoSolar. Atomera is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JinkoSolar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Atomera has a beta of 2, indicating that its share price is 100% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, JinkoSolar has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its share price is 47% less volatile than the S&P 500.

30.8% of Atomera shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.8% of JinkoSolar shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.1% of Atomera shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.8% of JinkoSolar shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

POET Technologies has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its share price is 47% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Atomera has a beta of 2, indicating that its share price is 100% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Atomera has lower revenue, but higher earnings than POET Technologies. POET Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atomera, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

POET Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $8.00, suggesting a potential downside of 16.49%. Given POET Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe POET Technologies is more favorable than Atomera.

2.0% of POET Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.8% of Atomera shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of POET Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Atomera shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Atomera has a net margin of 0.00% compared to POET Technologies' net margin of -5,857.02%. POET Technologies' return on equity of -38.88% beat Atomera's return on equity.

In the previous week, POET Technologies had 17 more articles in the media than Atomera. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for POET Technologies and 15 mentions for Atomera. POET Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.02 beat Atomera's score of 0.02 indicating that POET Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Inflection Point Acquisition's return on equity of -53.90% beat Atomera's return on equity.

In the previous week, Atomera had 15 more articles in the media than Inflection Point Acquisition. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Atomera and 0 mentions for Inflection Point Acquisition. Atomera's average media sentiment score of 0.02 beat Inflection Point Acquisition's score of 0.00 indicating that Atomera is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Atomera has a beta of 2, indicating that its share price is 100% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Inflection Point Acquisition has a beta of 0.01, indicating that its share price is 99% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Inflection Point Acquisition has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Atomera.

30.8% of Atomera shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Inflection Point Acquisition shares are held by institutional investors. 8.1% of Atomera shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Atomera has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Canadian Solar's net margin of -1.86%. Canadian Solar's return on equity of -4.95% beat Atomera's return on equity.

In the previous week, Atomera had 9 more articles in the media than Canadian Solar. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Atomera and 6 mentions for Canadian Solar. Canadian Solar's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Atomera's score of 0.02 indicating that Canadian Solar is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Canadian Solar has a beta of 1.44, indicating that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Atomera has a beta of 2, indicating that its stock price is 100% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Canadian Solar currently has a consensus price target of $18.36, indicating a potential upside of 3.87%. Given Canadian Solar's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Canadian Solar is more favorable than Atomera.

Atomera has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Canadian Solar. Atomera is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Canadian Solar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

52.4% of Canadian Solar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.8% of Atomera shares are held by institutional investors. 21.5% of Canadian Solar shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Atomera shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.