Churchill Capital Corp II Competitors

Foley Trasimene Acquisition Corp. II (NYSE:BFT) and Churchill Capital Corp II (NYSE:CCX) are both unclassified companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, earnings and risk.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

66.7% of Churchill Capital Corp II shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Foley Trasimene Acquisition Corp. II and Churchill Capital Corp II, as provided by MarketBeat.

Churchill Capital Corp II has a consensus price target of $14.50, suggesting a potential upside of 44.57%. Given Churchill Capital Corp II's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Churchill Capital Corp II is more favorable than Foley Trasimene Acquisition Corp. II.

Profitability

This table compares Foley Trasimene Acquisition Corp. II and Churchill Capital Corp II's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Foley Trasimene Acquisition Corp. II and Churchill Capital Corp II's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Summary

Churchill Capital Corp II beats Foley Trasimene Acquisition Corp. II on 3 of the 3 factors compared between the two stocks.

BTRS (NASDAQ:BTRS) and Churchill Capital Corp II (NYSE:CCX) are both unclassified companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and earnings.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

52.1% of BTRS shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.7% of Churchill Capital Corp II shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

BTRS has a beta of 0.33, indicating that its share price is 67% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Churchill Capital Corp II has a beta of 0.21, indicating that its share price is 79% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for BTRS and Churchill Capital Corp II, as provided by MarketBeat.

BTRS currently has a consensus price target of $21.00, suggesting a potential upside of 39.81%. Churchill Capital Corp II has a consensus price target of $14.50, suggesting a potential upside of 44.57%. Given Churchill Capital Corp II's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Churchill Capital Corp II is more favorable than BTRS.

Profitability

This table compares BTRS and Churchill Capital Corp II's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares BTRS and Churchill Capital Corp II's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Summary

Churchill Capital Corp II beats BTRS on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V (NYSE:IPOE) and Churchill Capital Corp II (NYSE:CCX) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and earnings.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

66.7% of Churchill Capital Corp II shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V and Churchill Capital Corp II, as provided by MarketBeat.

Churchill Capital Corp II has a consensus price target of $14.50, suggesting a potential upside of 44.57%. Given Churchill Capital Corp II's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Churchill Capital Corp II is more favorable than Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V.

Profitability

This table compares Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V and Churchill Capital Corp II's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V and Churchill Capital Corp II's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Summary

Churchill Capital Corp II beats Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. V on 3 of the 3 factors compared between the two stocks.

Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI (NYSE:IPOF) and Churchill Capital Corp II (NYSE:CCX) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and earnings.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

66.7% of Churchill Capital Corp II shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI and Churchill Capital Corp II, as provided by MarketBeat.

Churchill Capital Corp II has a consensus price target of $14.50, suggesting a potential upside of 44.57%. Given Churchill Capital Corp II's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Churchill Capital Corp II is more favorable than Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI.

Profitability

This table compares Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI and Churchill Capital Corp II's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI and Churchill Capital Corp II's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Summary

Churchill Capital Corp II beats Social Capital Hedosophia Holdings Corp. VI on 3 of the 3 factors compared between the two stocks.

Paya (NASDAQ:PAYA) and Churchill Capital Corp II (NYSE:CCX) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and earnings.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

41.2% of Paya shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.7% of Churchill Capital Corp II shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Paya shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Paya and Churchill Capital Corp II's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Paya and Churchill Capital Corp II, as provided by MarketBeat.

Paya currently has a consensus price target of $15.75, suggesting a potential upside of 36.48%. Churchill Capital Corp II has a consensus price target of $14.50, suggesting a potential upside of 44.57%. Given Churchill Capital Corp II's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Churchill Capital Corp II is more favorable than Paya.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Paya and Churchill Capital Corp II's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Risk & Volatility

Paya has a beta of 0.05, indicating that its share price is 95% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Churchill Capital Corp II has a beta of 0.21, indicating that its share price is 79% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Churchill Capital Corp II beats Paya on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Churchill Capital Corp II (NYSE:CCX) and Star Peak Energy Transition (NYSE:STPK) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

66.7% of Churchill Capital Corp II shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Churchill Capital Corp II and Star Peak Energy Transition's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Churchill Capital Corp II and Star Peak Energy Transition, as reported by MarketBeat.

Churchill Capital Corp II presently has a consensus target price of $14.50, suggesting a potential upside of 44.57%. Given Churchill Capital Corp II's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Churchill Capital Corp II is more favorable than Star Peak Energy Transition.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Churchill Capital Corp II and Star Peak Energy Transition's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Summary

Churchill Capital Corp II beats Star Peak Energy Transition on 3 of the 3 factors compared between the two stocks.