S&P 500   3,841.47 (-0.30%)
DOW   30,996.98 (-0.57%)
QQQ   325.42 (-0.29%)
AAPL   139.07 (+1.61%)
MSFT   225.95 (+0.44%)
FB   274.50 (+0.60%)
GOOGL   1,892.56 (+0.45%)
AMZN   3,292.23 (-0.45%)
TSLA   846.64 (+0.20%)
NVDA   548.50 (-1.12%)
BABA   258.62 (-0.53%)
CGC   33.80 (+0.72%)
GE   11.11 (+0.36%)
MU   82.28 (-3.21%)
AMD   92.79 (+1.38%)
NIO   61.95 (+6.19%)
T   28.93 (+0.35%)
F   11.52 (-0.09%)
ACB   10.65 (-4.66%)
BA   205.84 (-0.76%)
DIS   172.78 (+0.88%)
NFLX   565.17 (-2.53%)
GILD   66.94 (-0.06%)
S&P 500   3,841.47 (-0.30%)
DOW   30,996.98 (-0.57%)
QQQ   325.42 (-0.29%)
AAPL   139.07 (+1.61%)
MSFT   225.95 (+0.44%)
FB   274.50 (+0.60%)
GOOGL   1,892.56 (+0.45%)
AMZN   3,292.23 (-0.45%)
TSLA   846.64 (+0.20%)
NVDA   548.50 (-1.12%)
BABA   258.62 (-0.53%)
CGC   33.80 (+0.72%)
GE   11.11 (+0.36%)
MU   82.28 (-3.21%)
AMD   92.79 (+1.38%)
NIO   61.95 (+6.19%)
T   28.93 (+0.35%)
F   11.52 (-0.09%)
ACB   10.65 (-4.66%)
BA   205.84 (-0.76%)
DIS   172.78 (+0.88%)
NFLX   565.17 (-2.53%)
GILD   66.94 (-0.06%)
S&P 500   3,841.47 (-0.30%)
DOW   30,996.98 (-0.57%)
QQQ   325.42 (-0.29%)
AAPL   139.07 (+1.61%)
MSFT   225.95 (+0.44%)
FB   274.50 (+0.60%)
GOOGL   1,892.56 (+0.45%)
AMZN   3,292.23 (-0.45%)
TSLA   846.64 (+0.20%)
NVDA   548.50 (-1.12%)
BABA   258.62 (-0.53%)
CGC   33.80 (+0.72%)
GE   11.11 (+0.36%)
MU   82.28 (-3.21%)
AMD   92.79 (+1.38%)
NIO   61.95 (+6.19%)
T   28.93 (+0.35%)
F   11.52 (-0.09%)
ACB   10.65 (-4.66%)
BA   205.84 (-0.76%)
DIS   172.78 (+0.88%)
NFLX   565.17 (-2.53%)
GILD   66.94 (-0.06%)
S&P 500   3,841.47 (-0.30%)
DOW   30,996.98 (-0.57%)
QQQ   325.42 (-0.29%)
AAPL   139.07 (+1.61%)
MSFT   225.95 (+0.44%)
FB   274.50 (+0.60%)
GOOGL   1,892.56 (+0.45%)
AMZN   3,292.23 (-0.45%)
TSLA   846.64 (+0.20%)
NVDA   548.50 (-1.12%)
BABA   258.62 (-0.53%)
CGC   33.80 (+0.72%)
GE   11.11 (+0.36%)
MU   82.28 (-3.21%)
AMD   92.79 (+1.38%)
NIO   61.95 (+6.19%)
T   28.93 (+0.35%)
F   11.52 (-0.09%)
ACB   10.65 (-4.66%)
BA   205.84 (-0.76%)
DIS   172.78 (+0.88%)
NFLX   565.17 (-2.53%)
GILD   66.94 (-0.06%)
Log in
NYSE:CLGX

CoreLogic Competitors

$77.30
+0.51 (+0.66 %)
(As of 01/22/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$76.20
Now: $77.30
$77.74
50-Day Range
$74.32
MA: $76.72
$79.24
52-Week Range
$24.69
Now: $77.30
$80.22
Volume1.22 million shs
Average Volume1.17 million shs
Market Capitalization$6.01 billion
P/E Ratio26.56
Dividend Yield1.72%
Beta1.09

Competitors

CoreLogic (NYSE:CLGX) Vs. V, MA, FIS, FISV, ADP, and GPN

Should you be buying CLGX stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "data processing & outsourced services" are considered alternatives and competitors to CoreLogic, including Visa (V), Mastercard (MA), Fidelity National Information Services (FIS), Fiserv (FISV), Automatic Data Processing (ADP), and Global Payments (GPN).

Visa (NYSE:V) and CoreLogic (NYSE:CLGX) are both business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Dividends

Visa pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. CoreLogic pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Visa pays out 25.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CoreLogic pays out 52.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Visa has raised its dividend for 11 consecutive years and CoreLogic has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

80.5% of Visa shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.8% of CoreLogic shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Visa shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of CoreLogic shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Visa and CoreLogic's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Visa49.74%37.22%14.61%
CoreLogic13.23%27.11%6.44%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Visa and CoreLogic, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Visa042502.86
CoreLogic29101.92

Visa presently has a consensus price target of $222.7143, indicating a potential upside of 10.24%. CoreLogic has a consensus price target of $61.10, indicating a potential downside of 20.96%. Given Visa's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Visa is more favorable than CoreLogic.

Volatility and Risk

Visa has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CoreLogic has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Visa and CoreLogic's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Visa$21.85 billion18.02$10.87 billion$5.0440.08
CoreLogic$1.76 billion3.41$49.38 million$2.5030.92

Visa has higher revenue and earnings than CoreLogic. CoreLogic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Visa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Visa beats CoreLogic on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

CoreLogic (NYSE:CLGX) and Mastercard (NYSE:MA) are both business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Risk & Volatility

CoreLogic has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Mastercard has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares CoreLogic and Mastercard's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CoreLogic13.23%27.11%6.44%
Mastercard43.13%114.80%22.01%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares CoreLogic and Mastercard's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CoreLogic$1.76 billion3.41$49.38 million$2.5030.92
Mastercard$16.88 billion19.43$8.12 billion$7.7742.34

Mastercard has higher revenue and earnings than CoreLogic. CoreLogic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mastercard, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

89.8% of CoreLogic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.6% of Mastercard shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of CoreLogic shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Mastercard shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

CoreLogic pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Mastercard pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. CoreLogic pays out 52.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Mastercard pays out 22.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CoreLogic has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Mastercard has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for CoreLogic and Mastercard, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CoreLogic29101.92
Mastercard032802.90

CoreLogic presently has a consensus target price of $61.10, suggesting a potential downside of 20.96%. Mastercard has a consensus target price of $353.4375, suggesting a potential upside of 7.43%. Given Mastercard's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Mastercard is more favorable than CoreLogic.

Summary

Mastercard beats CoreLogic on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

CoreLogic (NYSE:CLGX) and Fidelity National Information Services (NYSE:FIS) are both business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

Profitability

This table compares CoreLogic and Fidelity National Information Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CoreLogic13.23%27.11%6.44%
Fidelity National Information Services-0.83%6.88%4.08%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

89.8% of CoreLogic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.5% of Fidelity National Information Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of CoreLogic shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Fidelity National Information Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for CoreLogic and Fidelity National Information Services, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CoreLogic29101.92
Fidelity National Information Services042412.90

CoreLogic currently has a consensus target price of $61.10, indicating a potential downside of 20.96%. Fidelity National Information Services has a consensus target price of $162.7241, indicating a potential upside of 26.06%. Given Fidelity National Information Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fidelity National Information Services is more favorable than CoreLogic.

Volatility & Risk

CoreLogic has a beta of 1.09, indicating that its share price is 9% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fidelity National Information Services has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its share price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

CoreLogic pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Fidelity National Information Services pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. CoreLogic pays out 52.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelity National Information Services pays out 25.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CoreLogic has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CoreLogic is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares CoreLogic and Fidelity National Information Services' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CoreLogic$1.76 billion3.41$49.38 million$2.5030.92
Fidelity National Information Services$10.33 billion7.75$298 million$5.6123.01

Fidelity National Information Services has higher revenue and earnings than CoreLogic. Fidelity National Information Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CoreLogic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Fidelity National Information Services beats CoreLogic on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fiserv (NASDAQ:FISV) and CoreLogic (NYSE:CLGX) are both business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and risk.

Volatility and Risk

Fiserv has a beta of 0.85, meaning that its share price is 15% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CoreLogic has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its share price is 9% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

91.7% of Fiserv shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.8% of CoreLogic shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Fiserv shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of CoreLogic shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Fiserv and CoreLogic's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fiserv$10.19 billion7.06$893 million$4.0026.82
CoreLogic$1.76 billion3.41$49.38 million$2.5030.92

Fiserv has higher revenue and earnings than CoreLogic. Fiserv is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CoreLogic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Fiserv and CoreLogic, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fiserv042912.91
CoreLogic29101.92

Fiserv currently has a consensus target price of $128.1250, indicating a potential upside of 19.43%. CoreLogic has a consensus target price of $61.10, indicating a potential downside of 20.96%. Given Fiserv's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Fiserv is more favorable than CoreLogic.

Profitability

This table compares Fiserv and CoreLogic's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Fiserv6.01%8.75%3.90%
CoreLogic13.23%27.11%6.44%

Summary

Fiserv beats CoreLogic on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Automatic Data Processing (NASDAQ:ADP) and CoreLogic (NYSE:CLGX) are both business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Dividends

Automatic Data Processing pays an annual dividend of $3.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. CoreLogic pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Automatic Data Processing pays out 62.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CoreLogic pays out 52.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Automatic Data Processing has increased its dividend for 47 consecutive years and CoreLogic has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Automatic Data Processing is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

79.7% of Automatic Data Processing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.8% of CoreLogic shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Automatic Data Processing shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of CoreLogic shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Automatic Data Processing and CoreLogic's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Automatic Data Processing$14.59 billion4.76$2.47 billion$5.9227.36
CoreLogic$1.76 billion3.41$49.38 million$2.5030.92

Automatic Data Processing has higher revenue and earnings than CoreLogic. Automatic Data Processing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CoreLogic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CoreLogic has a beta of 1.09, indicating that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Automatic Data Processing and CoreLogic's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Automatic Data Processing17.07%46.13%5.94%
CoreLogic13.23%27.11%6.44%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Automatic Data Processing and CoreLogic, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Automatic Data Processing410301.94
CoreLogic29101.92

Automatic Data Processing currently has a consensus target price of $158.8571, suggesting a potential downside of 1.93%. CoreLogic has a consensus target price of $61.10, suggesting a potential downside of 20.96%. Given Automatic Data Processing's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Automatic Data Processing is more favorable than CoreLogic.

Summary

Automatic Data Processing beats CoreLogic on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Global Payments (NYSE:GPN) and CoreLogic (NYSE:CLGX) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Global Payments has a beta of 1.16, meaning that its share price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CoreLogic has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its share price is 9% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

86.7% of Global Payments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.8% of CoreLogic shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Global Payments shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of CoreLogic shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Global Payments and CoreLogic, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Global Payments032802.90
CoreLogic29101.92

Global Payments currently has a consensus price target of $204.1333, suggesting a potential upside of 8.86%. CoreLogic has a consensus price target of $61.10, suggesting a potential downside of 20.96%. Given Global Payments' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Global Payments is more favorable than CoreLogic.

Dividends

Global Payments pays an annual dividend of $0.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. CoreLogic pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Global Payments pays out 13.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CoreLogic pays out 52.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CoreLogic has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CoreLogic is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Global Payments and CoreLogic's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global Payments$4.91 billion11.43$430.61 million$5.8632.00
CoreLogic$1.76 billion3.41$49.38 million$2.5030.92

Global Payments has higher revenue and earnings than CoreLogic. CoreLogic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Payments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Global Payments and CoreLogic's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Global Payments6.75%6.46%4.06%
CoreLogic13.23%27.11%6.44%

Summary

Global Payments beats CoreLogic on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.


CoreLogic Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Visa logo
V
Visa
2.8$202.02+1.5%$393.65 billion$21.85 billion41.40Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Mastercard logo
MA
Mastercard
2.1$328.99+1.7%$327.98 billion$16.88 billion49.32Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Fidelity National Information Services logo
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services
2.5$129.08+3.5%$80.10 billion$10.33 billion-717.11Analyst Revision
Fiserv logo
FISV
Fiserv
1.9$107.28+1.6%$71.92 billion$10.19 billion81.27
Automatic Data Processing logo
ADP
Automatic Data Processing
2.4$161.98+0.6%$69.46 billion$14.59 billion28.12Upcoming Earnings
Global Payments logo
GPN
Global Payments
2.1$187.52+0.9%$56.13 billion$4.91 billion111.62
Paychex logo
PAYX
Paychex
1.5$86.87+0.8%$31.33 billion$4.04 billion29.65Dividend Announcement
News Coverage
FLEETCOR Technologies logo
FLT
FLEETCOR Technologies
1.5$267.41+0.9%$22.30 billion$2.65 billion32.26
Broadridge Financial Solutions logo
BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions
1.8$148.94+1.5%$17.22 billion$4.53 billion36.78
Jack Henry & Associates logo
JKHY
Jack Henry & Associates
2.4$151.50+1.1%$11.56 billion$1.70 billion38.95
The Western Union logo
WU
The Western Union
2.2$22.06+0.1%$9.07 billion$5.29 billion15.21
WEX logo
WEX
WEX
1.4$201.75+0.6%$8.90 billion$1.72 billion70.54
Genpact logo
G
Genpact
1.9$41.46+0.4%$7.85 billion$3.52 billion25.75News Coverage
Euronet Worldwide logo
EEFT
Euronet Worldwide
1.5$139.29+0.3%$7.29 billion$2.75 billion262.82
Maximus logo
MMS
Maximus
2.3$77.19+1.9%$4.74 billion$3.46 billion22.70
TTEC logo
TTEC
TTEC
1.2$82.89+7.2%$3.87 billion$1.64 billion38.02News Coverage
Alliance Data Systems logo
ADS
Alliance Data Systems
2.6$70.82+0.6%$3.38 billion$5.58 billion10.16Upcoming Earnings
ExlService logo
EXLS
ExlService
1.3$86.60+1.7%$2.93 billion$991.35 million38.15News Coverage
Cardtronics logo
CATM
Cardtronics
1.2$40.86+1.0%$1.82 billion$1.35 billion81.72
Sykes Enterprises logo
SYKE
Sykes Enterprises
1.3$41.27+1.2%$1.63 billion$1.61 billion31.27
CSG Systems International logo
CSGS
CSG Systems International
2.2$45.78+0.9%$1.51 billion$996.81 million21.80
Everi logo
EVRI
Everi
1.6$13.40+1.2%$1.15 billion$533.23 million-13.14Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
OneSmart International Education Group logo
ONE
OneSmart International Education Group
1.4$3.89+2.6%$633.68 million$502.22 million-7.20High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Cass Information Systems logo
CASS
Cass Information Systems
1.0$40.18+0.1%$579.48 million$157.24 million23.36Upcoming Earnings
MoneyGram International logo
MGI
MoneyGram International
1.2$6.46+6.7%$468.47 million$1.29 billion-17.00High Trading Volume
PRGX Global logo
PRGX
PRGX Global
1.5$7.63+0.0%$179.77 million$169.76 million-36.33
Steel Connect logo
STCN
Steel Connect
0.6$2.47+6.9%$155.10 million$782.81 million-9.50Unusual Options Activity
News Coverage
Gap Up
INOD
Innodata
0.4$5.50+1.5%$136.09 million$55.86 million-275.00
This page was last updated on 1/22/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.