NYSE:CPG

Crescent Point Energy Competitors

$4.10
+0.29 (+7.61 %)
(As of 04/14/2021 12:02 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$3.87
Now: $4.10
$4.11
50-Day Range
$3.66
MA: $4.15
$4.58
52-Week Range
$0.81
Now: $4.10
$4.66
Volume185,073 shs
Average Volume5.34 million shs
Market Capitalization$2.38 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield0.25%
Beta2.89

Competitors

Crescent Point Energy (NYSE:CPG) Vs. MRO, COG, APA, XEC, OVV, and EQT

Should you be buying CPG stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "crude petroleum & natural gas" are considered alternatives and competitors to Crescent Point Energy, including Marathon Oil (MRO), Cabot Oil & Gas (COG), Apache (APA), Cimarex Energy (XEC), Ovintiv (OVV), and EQT (EQT).

Marathon Oil (NYSE:MRO) and Crescent Point Energy (NYSE:CPG) are both mid-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Marathon Oil and Crescent Point Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Marathon Oil310802.24
Crescent Point Energy02802.80

Marathon Oil presently has a consensus target price of $8.6706, suggesting a potential downside of 24.08%. Crescent Point Energy has a consensus target price of $6.5556, suggesting a potential upside of 61.47%. Given Crescent Point Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Crescent Point Energy is more favorable than Marathon Oil.

Dividends

Marathon Oil pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Crescent Point Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Marathon Oil pays out 16.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crescent Point Energy pays out 1.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marathon Oil has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Crescent Point Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

67.1% of Marathon Oil shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Crescent Point Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Marathon Oil shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Marathon Oil has a beta of 3.36, meaning that its share price is 236% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Crescent Point Energy has a beta of 2.89, meaning that its share price is 189% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Marathon Oil and Crescent Point Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Marathon Oil$5.19 billion1.73$480 million$0.7515.16
Crescent Point Energy$2.51 billion0.95$-778,700,000.00$0.547.59

Marathon Oil has higher revenue and earnings than Crescent Point Energy. Crescent Point Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Oil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Marathon Oil and Crescent Point Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Marathon Oil-32.64%-6.64%-3.97%
Crescent Point Energy-166.19%4.03%1.85%

Summary

Marathon Oil beats Crescent Point Energy on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cabot Oil & Gas (NYSE:COG) and Crescent Point Energy (NYSE:CPG) are both mid-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Cabot Oil & Gas and Crescent Point Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Cabot Oil & Gas16.73%8.84%4.24%
Crescent Point Energy-166.19%4.03%1.85%

Risk and Volatility

Cabot Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.16, meaning that its stock price is 84% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Crescent Point Energy has a beta of 2.89, meaning that its stock price is 189% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Cabot Oil & Gas and Crescent Point Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cabot Oil & Gas$2.07 billion3.32$681.07 million$1.6210.61
Crescent Point Energy$2.51 billion0.95$-778,700,000.00$0.547.59

Cabot Oil & Gas has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Crescent Point Energy. Crescent Point Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cabot Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

96.9% of Cabot Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Crescent Point Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Cabot Oil & Gas shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Cabot Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Crescent Point Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Cabot Oil & Gas pays out 24.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crescent Point Energy pays out 1.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cabot Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Crescent Point Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Cabot Oil & Gas and Crescent Point Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Cabot Oil & Gas210402.13
Crescent Point Energy02802.80

Cabot Oil & Gas presently has a consensus price target of $20.1250, indicating a potential upside of 16.87%. Crescent Point Energy has a consensus price target of $6.5556, indicating a potential upside of 61.47%. Given Crescent Point Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Crescent Point Energy is more favorable than Cabot Oil & Gas.

Summary

Cabot Oil & Gas beats Crescent Point Energy on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Crescent Point Energy (NYSE:CPG) and Apache (NASDAQ:APA) are both mid-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and risk.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

28.7% of Crescent Point Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.5% of Apache shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Apache shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Crescent Point Energy and Apache, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Crescent Point Energy02802.80
Apache111912.45

Crescent Point Energy presently has a consensus target price of $6.5556, indicating a potential upside of 61.47%. Apache has a consensus target price of $18.8333, indicating a potential upside of 1.15%. Given Crescent Point Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Crescent Point Energy is more favorable than Apache.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Crescent Point Energy and Apache's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crescent Point Energy$2.51 billion0.95$-778,700,000.00$0.547.59
Apache$6.41 billion1.09$-3,553,000,000.00N/AN/A

Crescent Point Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Apache.

Profitability

This table compares Crescent Point Energy and Apache's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Crescent Point Energy-166.19%4.03%1.85%
Apache-162.10%-48.58%-2.51%

Dividends

Crescent Point Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Apache pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Crescent Point Energy pays out 1.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crescent Point Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Apache has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Volatility and Risk

Crescent Point Energy has a beta of 2.89, suggesting that its stock price is 189% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Apache has a beta of 4.87, suggesting that its stock price is 387% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Apache beats Crescent Point Energy on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cimarex Energy (NYSE:XEC) and Crescent Point Energy (NYSE:CPG) are both mid-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

Cimarex Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Crescent Point Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Cimarex Energy pays out 19.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crescent Point Energy pays out 1.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cimarex Energy has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Crescent Point Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Cimarex Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Cimarex Energy and Crescent Point Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Cimarex Energy-104.14%7.29%3.41%
Crescent Point Energy-166.19%4.03%1.85%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

91.5% of Cimarex Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Crescent Point Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Cimarex Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Cimarex Energy and Crescent Point Energy's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cimarex Energy$2.36 billion2.84$-124,620,000.00$4.4614.64
Crescent Point Energy$2.51 billion0.95$-778,700,000.00$0.547.59

Cimarex Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Crescent Point Energy. Crescent Point Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cimarex Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Cimarex Energy has a beta of 2.4, suggesting that its share price is 140% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Crescent Point Energy has a beta of 2.89, suggesting that its share price is 189% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Cimarex Energy and Crescent Point Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Cimarex Energy041602.80
Crescent Point Energy02802.80

Cimarex Energy presently has a consensus target price of $52.75, suggesting a potential downside of 19.31%. Crescent Point Energy has a consensus target price of $6.5556, suggesting a potential upside of 61.47%. Given Crescent Point Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Crescent Point Energy is more favorable than Cimarex Energy.

Summary

Cimarex Energy beats Crescent Point Energy on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ovintiv (NYSE:OVV) and Crescent Point Energy (NYSE:CPG) are both mid-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

70.0% of Ovintiv shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Crescent Point Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Ovintiv shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Ovintiv and Crescent Point Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ovintiv28902.37
Crescent Point Energy02802.80

Ovintiv currently has a consensus target price of $21.9762, suggesting a potential downside of 11.56%. Crescent Point Energy has a consensus target price of $6.5556, suggesting a potential upside of 61.47%. Given Crescent Point Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Crescent Point Energy is more favorable than Ovintiv.

Profitability

This table compares Ovintiv and Crescent Point Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ovintiv-89.63%1.56%0.63%
Crescent Point Energy-166.19%4.03%1.85%

Dividends

Ovintiv pays an annual dividend of $0.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Crescent Point Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Ovintiv pays out 11.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crescent Point Energy pays out 1.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ovintiv has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Crescent Point Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Volatility & Risk

Ovintiv has a beta of 4, suggesting that its stock price is 300% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Crescent Point Energy has a beta of 2.89, suggesting that its stock price is 189% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ovintiv and Crescent Point Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ovintiv$6.73 billion0.96$234 million$3.297.57
Crescent Point Energy$2.51 billion0.95$-778,700,000.00$0.547.59

Ovintiv has higher revenue and earnings than Crescent Point Energy. Ovintiv is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crescent Point Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Ovintiv beats Crescent Point Energy on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

EQT (NYSE:EQT) and Crescent Point Energy (NYSE:CPG) are both mid-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for EQT and Crescent Point Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
EQT141202.65
Crescent Point Energy02802.80

EQT currently has a consensus price target of $18.0625, indicating a potential upside of 0.63%. Crescent Point Energy has a consensus price target of $6.5556, indicating a potential upside of 61.47%. Given Crescent Point Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Crescent Point Energy is more favorable than EQT.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares EQT and Crescent Point Energy's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EQT$4.42 billion1.13$-1,221,690,000.00$0.8321.60
Crescent Point Energy$2.51 billion0.95$-778,700,000.00$0.547.59

Crescent Point Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than EQT. Crescent Point Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EQT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

EQT has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its share price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Crescent Point Energy has a beta of 2.89, indicating that its share price is 189% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares EQT and Crescent Point Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
EQT-78.35%-0.58%-0.30%
Crescent Point Energy-166.19%4.03%1.85%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

93.8% of EQT shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Crescent Point Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of EQT shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.


Crescent Point Energy Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Marathon Oil logo
MRO
Marathon Oil
1.7$11.37+5.4%$8.49 billion$5.19 billion-7.90Analyst Report
Insider Selling
News Coverage
Cabot Oil & Gas logo
COG
Cabot Oil & Gas
2.3$17.19+2.7%$6.68 billion$2.07 billion27.73
Apache logo
APA
Apache
1.4$18.48+6.5%$6.53 billion$6.41 billion-0.89
Cimarex Energy logo
XEC
Cimarex Energy
2.1$65.28+5.2%$6.36 billion$2.36 billion-3.18Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
Gap Down
Ovintiv logo
OVV
Ovintiv
2.2$24.91+6.5%$6.05 billion$6.73 billion-1.18Analyst Downgrade
EQT logo
EQT
EQT
1.4$17.93+5.9%$4.70 billion$4.42 billion-2.08
PDC Energy logo
PDCE
PDC Energy
1.7$37.32+6.9%$3.47 billion$1.16 billion-4.77
CNX Resources logo
CNX
CNX Resources
1.9$14.26+5.0%$2.98 billion$1.92 billion-2.84
Southwestern Energy logo
SWN
Southwestern Energy
1.5$4.27+4.9%$2.74 billion$3.04 billion-0.80
Antero Resources logo
AR
Antero Resources
1.6$9.78+8.4%$2.70 billion$4.41 billion-1.50
Matador Resources logo
MTDR
Matador Resources
2.3$25.38+9.3%$2.69 billion$983.67 million-6.15Unusual Options Activity
Gap Down
Magnolia Oil & Gas logo
MGY
Magnolia Oil & Gas
1.2$11.93+8.7%$2.65 billion$936.14 million-1.62
Murphy Oil logo
MUR
Murphy Oil
1.5$17.64+7.0%$2.52 billion$2.83 billion-2.59Dividend Announcement
Gap Down
Range Resources logo
RRC
Range Resources
1.3$9.79+7.3%$2.36 billion$2.83 billion-0.97
Viper Energy Partners logo
VNOM
Viper Energy Partners
1.0$17.10+5.3%$2.35 billion$298.28 million-7.13Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Black Stone Minerals logo
BSM
Black Stone Minerals
1.5$9.89+7.4%$1.90 billion$487.82 million18.66
SM Energy logo
SM
SM Energy
1.4$18.51+11.5%$1.88 billion$1.59 billion-2.99Dividend Announcement
Increase in Short Interest
Gap Down
Callon Petroleum logo
CPE
Callon Petroleum
1.9$38.39+11.1%$1.58 billion$671.57 million-0.74Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
Gap Down
Enerplus logo
ERF
Enerplus
2.2$5.61+4.6%$1.37 billion$945.62 million-1.47
Comstock Resources logo
CRK
Comstock Resources
1.6$5.24+5.3%$1.15 billion$768.69 million-10.08Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Centennial Resource Development logo
CDEV
Centennial Resource Development
1.0$4.81+16.0%$1.13 billion$944.33 million-2.26Increase in Short Interest
Gap Down
Kosmos Energy logo
KOS
Kosmos Energy
1.2$2.95+8.5%$1.10 billion$1.51 billion-2.63Gap Down
Vermilion Energy logo
VET
Vermilion Energy
1.6$7.38+7.7%$1.08 billion$1.27 billion-1.06Gap Down
QEP Resources logo
QEP
QEP Resources
1.0$4.08+0.0%$989.67 million$1.21 billion34.00
Talos Energy logo
TALO
Talos Energy
1.6$12.55+7.5%$948.62 million$927.62 million-73.82Gap Down
GeoPark logo
GPRK
GeoPark
1.8$16.55+6.6%$943.52 million$628.91 million-8.80Unusual Options Activity
Gap Down
Brigham Minerals logo
MNRL
Brigham Minerals
1.9$16.62+5.5%$890.60 million$101.51 million-831.00Increase in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
Par Pacific logo
PARR
Par Pacific
1.3$15.65+7.1%$785.29 million$5.40 billion-3.45Analyst Upgrade
Gap Down
Tellurian logo
TELL
Tellurian
1.4$2.06+8.5%$726.78 million$28.77 million-2.10Analyst Upgrade
Increase in Short Interest
Gap Up
Bonanza Creek Energy logo
BCEI
Bonanza Creek Energy
1.3$34.66+5.0%$686.44 million$313.22 million17.77Analyst Report
Kimbell Royalty Partners logo
KRP
Kimbell Royalty Partners
1.8$9.99+1.9%$585.04 million$108.22 million-1.83
Earthstone Energy logo
ESTE
Earthstone Energy
1.2$7.38+8.5%$527.11 million$191.26 million-29.52Gap Down
Dorchester Minerals logo
DMLP
Dorchester Minerals
1.0$14.16+0.5%$488.64 million$78.80 million17.92
Berry logo
BRY
Berry
1.4$6.25+6.9%$468.34 million$559.41 million-2.41Analyst Upgrade
Gap Down
W&T Offshore logo
WTI
W&T Offshore
1.4$3.53+6.8%$468.18 million$534.90 million3.46
Laredo Petroleum logo
LPI
Laredo Petroleum
0.9$38.20+9.5%$445.82 million$837.28 million-0.56Gap Down
Hess Midstream logo
HESM
Hess Midstream
1.9$22.94+2.3%$404.01 million$848.30 million18.65Gap Down
FLMN
Falcon Minerals
1.3$4.58+2.2%$385.76 million$68.46 million45.80Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Down
TETRA Technologies logo
TTI
TETRA Technologies
1.0$2.78+7.9%$324.19 million$1.04 billion-2.38
Vista Oil & Gas logo
VIST
Vista Oil & Gas
0.6$2.75+1.1%$237.46 million$415.98 million-1.80
Torchlight Energy Resources logo
TRCH
Torchlight Energy Resources
0.3$1.68+3.0%$236.86 million$750,000.00-8.40
Penn Virginia logo
PVAC
Penn Virginia
1.2$13.31+7.3%$188.85 million$471.22 million-1.18Gap Down
BATL
Battalion Oil
0.3$11.50+0.5%$188.01 millionN/A-1.06
SandRidge Energy logo
SD
SandRidge Energy
0.5$3.78+3.2%$132.25 million$266.85 million-0.26News Coverage
VAALCO Energy logo
EGY
VAALCO Energy
1.3$2.39+5.0%$130.90 million$84.52 million-3.19Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
TransGlobe Energy logo
TGA
TransGlobe Energy
1.0$1.60+8.1%$106.64 million$278.93 million-1.40Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
SilverBow Resources logo
SBOW
SilverBow Resources
1.5$7.90+0.5%$95.45 million$288.63 million-0.30
AMPY
Amplify Energy
0.9$2.58+3.1%$94.92 million$275.58 million-0.21Gap Down
PNRG
PrimeEnergy Resources
0.8$45.66+3.0%$93.74 million$104.82 million0.00Gap Up
EPSN
Epsilon Energy
0.6$3.75+2.4%$89.95 million$26.69 million62.51High Trading Volume
Increase in Short Interest
This page was last updated on 4/14/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.