S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
Log in
NYSE:FBHS

Fortune Brands Home & Security Competitors

$85.76
+3.35 (+4.07 %)
(As of 03/5/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$81.64
Now: $85.76
$86.16
50-Day Range
$82.41
MA: $87.93
$92.57
52-Week Range
$33.90
Now: $85.76
$93.40
Volume981,819 shs
Average Volume902,045 shs
Market Capitalization$11.89 billion
P/E Ratio24.43
Dividend Yield1.25%
Beta1.66

Competitors

Fortune Brands Home & Security (NYSE:FBHS) Vs. MAS, LII, TREX, AOS, OC, and BLDR

Should you be buying FBHS stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "building products" are considered alternatives and competitors to Fortune Brands Home & Security, including Masco (MAS), Lennox International (LII), Trex (TREX), A. O. Smith (AOS), Owens Corning (OC), and Builders FirstSource (BLDR).

Masco (NYSE:MAS) and Fortune Brands Home & Security (NYSE:FBHS) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Dividends

Masco pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Fortune Brands Home & Security pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Masco pays out 24.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Home & Security pays out 28.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Masco has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Fortune Brands Home & Security has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

90.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Masco shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Masco and Fortune Brands Home & Security's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Masco21.27%1,966.88%14.89%
Fortune Brands Home & Security8.36%22.37%8.68%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Masco and Fortune Brands Home & Security, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Masco071102.61
Fortune Brands Home & Security141002.60

Masco currently has a consensus price target of $60.6944, indicating a potential upside of 11.80%. Fortune Brands Home & Security has a consensus price target of $87.4375, indicating a potential upside of 1.96%. Given Masco's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Masco is more favorable than Fortune Brands Home & Security.

Volatility & Risk

Masco has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Home & Security has a beta of 1.66, indicating that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Masco and Fortune Brands Home & Security's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Masco$6.71 billion2.08$935 million$2.2524.13
Fortune Brands Home & Security$5.76 billion2.06$431.90 million$3.6023.82

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Fortune Brands Home & Security. Fortune Brands Home & Security is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Masco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Masco beats Fortune Brands Home & Security on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lennox International (NYSE:LII) and Fortune Brands Home & Security (NYSE:FBHS) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

66.3% of Lennox International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of Lennox International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Lennox International and Fortune Brands Home & Security's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lennox International$3.81 billion2.81$408.70 million$11.1925.30
Fortune Brands Home & Security$5.76 billion2.06$431.90 million$3.6023.82

Fortune Brands Home & Security has higher revenue and earnings than Lennox International. Fortune Brands Home & Security is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lennox International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Lennox International and Fortune Brands Home & Security's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Lennox International9.95%-176.45%17.78%
Fortune Brands Home & Security8.36%22.37%8.68%

Dividends

Lennox International pays an annual dividend of $3.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Fortune Brands Home & Security pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Lennox International pays out 27.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fortune Brands Home & Security pays out 28.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lennox International has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Fortune Brands Home & Security has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Volatility & Risk

Lennox International has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Home & Security has a beta of 1.66, indicating that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Lennox International and Fortune Brands Home & Security, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Lennox International410001.71
Fortune Brands Home & Security141002.60

Lennox International currently has a consensus target price of $254.0714, suggesting a potential downside of 10.25%. Fortune Brands Home & Security has a consensus target price of $87.4375, suggesting a potential upside of 1.96%. Given Fortune Brands Home & Security's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fortune Brands Home & Security is more favorable than Lennox International.

Summary

Fortune Brands Home & Security beats Lennox International on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fortune Brands Home & Security (NYSE:FBHS) and Trex (NYSE:TREX) are both large-cap industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

86.6% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.6% of Trex shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Trex shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Fortune Brands Home & Security and Trex's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Brands Home & Security$5.76 billion2.06$431.90 million$3.6023.82
Trex$745.35 million13.71$144.74 million$1.2471.16

Fortune Brands Home & Security has higher revenue and earnings than Trex. Fortune Brands Home & Security is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Fortune Brands Home & Security and Trex's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Fortune Brands Home & Security8.36%22.37%8.68%
Trex20.53%35.52%26.44%

Risk and Volatility

Fortune Brands Home & Security has a beta of 1.66, suggesting that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Trex has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Fortune Brands Home & Security and Trex, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fortune Brands Home & Security141002.60
Trex012302.20

Fortune Brands Home & Security presently has a consensus price target of $87.4375, suggesting a potential upside of 1.96%. Trex has a consensus price target of $78.8333, suggesting a potential downside of 10.66%. Given Fortune Brands Home & Security's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Fortune Brands Home & Security is more favorable than Trex.

Summary

Fortune Brands Home & Security beats Trex on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fortune Brands Home & Security (NYSE:FBHS) and A. O. Smith (NYSE:AOS) are both large-cap industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

86.6% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.1% of A. O. Smith shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of A. O. Smith shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Fortune Brands Home & Security and A. O. Smith's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Brands Home & Security$5.76 billion2.06$431.90 million$3.6023.82
A. O. Smith$2.99 billion3.38$370 million$2.2228.14

Fortune Brands Home & Security has higher revenue and earnings than A. O. Smith. Fortune Brands Home & Security is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than A. O. Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Fortune Brands Home & Security and A. O. Smith's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Fortune Brands Home & Security8.36%22.37%8.68%
A. O. Smith11.25%19.29%10.75%

Dividends

Fortune Brands Home & Security pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. A. O. Smith pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Fortune Brands Home & Security pays out 28.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. A. O. Smith pays out 46.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fortune Brands Home & Security has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and A. O. Smith has increased its dividend for 29 consecutive years. A. O. Smith is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Risk and Volatility

Fortune Brands Home & Security has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its share price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, A. O. Smith has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Fortune Brands Home & Security and A. O. Smith, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fortune Brands Home & Security141002.60
A. O. Smith15402.30

Fortune Brands Home & Security presently has a consensus price target of $87.4375, suggesting a potential upside of 1.96%. A. O. Smith has a consensus price target of $54.1429, suggesting a potential downside of 13.34%. Given Fortune Brands Home & Security's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Fortune Brands Home & Security is more favorable than A. O. Smith.

Summary

Fortune Brands Home & Security beats A. O. Smith on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fortune Brands Home & Security (NYSE:FBHS) and Owens Corning (NYSE:OC) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

86.6% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.2% of Owens Corning shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Owens Corning shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Fortune Brands Home & Security and Owens Corning's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Brands Home & Security$5.76 billion2.06$431.90 million$3.6023.82
Owens Corning$7.16 billion1.18$405 million$4.5417.80

Fortune Brands Home & Security has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Owens Corning. Owens Corning is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Home & Security, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Fortune Brands Home & Security and Owens Corning's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Fortune Brands Home & Security8.36%22.37%8.68%
Owens Corning-7.94%11.99%4.98%

Dividends

Fortune Brands Home & Security pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Owens Corning pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Fortune Brands Home & Security pays out 28.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Owens Corning pays out 22.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fortune Brands Home & Security has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Owens Corning has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Owens Corning is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Risk and Volatility

Fortune Brands Home & Security has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its share price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Owens Corning has a beta of 1.54, meaning that its share price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Fortune Brands Home & Security and Owens Corning, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fortune Brands Home & Security141002.60
Owens Corning212702.24

Fortune Brands Home & Security presently has a consensus price target of $87.4375, suggesting a potential upside of 1.96%. Owens Corning has a consensus price target of $111.8095, suggesting a potential upside of 38.34%. Given Owens Corning's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Owens Corning is more favorable than Fortune Brands Home & Security.

Summary

Fortune Brands Home & Security beats Owens Corning on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fortune Brands Home & Security (NYSE:FBHS) and Builders FirstSource (NASDAQ:BLDR) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

86.6% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.3% of Builders FirstSource shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Fortune Brands Home & Security shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Builders FirstSource shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Fortune Brands Home & Security and Builders FirstSource's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Brands Home & Security$5.76 billion2.06$431.90 million$3.6023.82
Builders FirstSource$7.28 billion0.70$221.81 million$2.0920.82

Fortune Brands Home & Security has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Builders FirstSource. Builders FirstSource is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Home & Security, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Fortune Brands Home & Security and Builders FirstSource's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Fortune Brands Home & Security8.36%22.37%8.68%
Builders FirstSource2.76%29.40%7.22%

Risk and Volatility

Fortune Brands Home & Security has a beta of 1.66, suggesting that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Builders FirstSource has a beta of 2.65, suggesting that its stock price is 165% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Fortune Brands Home & Security and Builders FirstSource, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fortune Brands Home & Security141002.60
Builders FirstSource001603.00

Fortune Brands Home & Security presently has a consensus price target of $87.4375, suggesting a potential upside of 1.96%. Builders FirstSource has a consensus price target of $43.5625, suggesting a potential upside of 0.10%. Given Fortune Brands Home & Security's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Fortune Brands Home & Security is more favorable than Builders FirstSource.


Fortune Brands Home & Security Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Masco logo
MAS
Masco
2.4$54.29+2.7%$13.96 billion$6.71 billion10.04
Lennox International logo
LII
Lennox International
1.6$283.08+1.7%$10.68 billion$3.81 billion30.50Analyst Report
News Coverage
Trex logo
TREX
Trex
1.6$88.24+3.5%$10.22 billion$745.35 million61.07High Trading Volume
A. O. Smith logo
AOS
A. O. Smith
2.4$62.48+2.3%$10.11 billion$2.99 billion32.04Insider Selling
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Owens Corning logo
OC
Owens Corning
2.4$80.82+4.1%$8.48 billion$7.16 billion-16.13Analyst Downgrade
Gap Up
Builders FirstSource logo
BLDR
Builders FirstSource
1.8$43.52+2.8%$5.08 billion$7.28 billion23.91Unusual Options Activity
Analyst Revision
Simpson Manufacturing logo
SSD
Simpson Manufacturing
1.7$100.38+1.6%$4.35 billion$1.14 billion23.79Insider Selling
High Trading Volume
Armstrong World Industries logo
AWI
Armstrong World Industries
1.3$86.06+1.0%$4.11 billion$1.04 billion-54.81Analyst Report
UFP Industries logo
UFPI
UFP Industries
1.7$62.40+1.2%$3.82 billion$4.42 billion17.38Analyst Upgrade
AAON logo
AAON
AAON
1.2$72.80+1.0%$3.81 billion$469.33 million49.86Insider Selling
Gibraltar Industries logo
ROCK
Gibraltar Industries
1.6$81.42+1.4%$2.65 billion$1.05 billion30.61Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Patrick Industries logo
PATK
Patrick Industries
2.0$84.05+4.0%$1.98 billion$2.34 billion24.58Insider Selling
Gap Up
American Woodmark logo
AMWD
American Woodmark
1.6$94.85+4.0%$1.61 billion$1.65 billion24.96Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
Gap Up
PGT Innovations logo
PGTI
PGT Innovations
1.4$24.39+3.9%$1.44 billion$744.96 million37.52Analyst Upgrade
Insider Selling
Griffon logo
GFF
Griffon
2.4$25.35+3.0%$1.43 billion$2.41 billion21.67
Apogee Enterprises logo
APOG
Apogee Enterprises
2.0$38.39+2.1%$998.45 million$1.39 billion14.49
Quanex Building Products logo
NX
Quanex Building Products
1.9$25.04+2.1%$833.78 million$851.57 million21.22Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Insteel Industries logo
IIIN
Insteel Industries
1.1$32.98+3.1%$636.98 million$472.62 million33.65
This page was last updated on 3/7/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.