NYSE:FGP

Ferrellgas Partners Competitors

$0.67

+0.08 (+13.56 %)

(As of 01/15/2021 12:00 AM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$0.51

Now: $0.67▼

$0.67

50-Day Range

$0.25

MA: $0.33▼

$0.55

52-Week Range

$0.30

Now: $0.67▼

$1.87

Volume631,527 shs

Average Volume488,367 shs

Market Capitalization$65.09 million

P/E RatioN/A

Dividend YieldN/A

Beta2.39

Ferrellgas Partners (NYSE:FGP) Vs. CLMT, CEIX, NR, GMLP, TUSK, and RGCO

Should you be buying FGP stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "oils/energy" are considered alternatives and competitors to Ferrellgas Partners, including Calumet Specialty Products Partners (CLMT), CONSOL Energy (CEIX), Newpark Resources (NR), Golar LNG Partners (GMLP), Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK), and RGC Resources (RGCO).

Ferrellgas Partners vs. Calumet Specialty Products Partners Stock

Ferrellgas Partners (NYSE:FGP) and Calumet Specialty Products Partners (NASDAQ:CLMT) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Ferrellgas Partners and Calumet Specialty Products Partners' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ferrellgas Partners	-3.23%	N/A	-3.88%
Calumet Specialty Products Partners	-4.24%	-314.00%	-4.77%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Ferrellgas Partners and Calumet Specialty Products Partners, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ferrellgas Partners	0	0	0	0	N/A
Calumet Specialty Products Partners	0	3	0	0	2.00

Calumet Specialty Products Partners has a consensus target price of $2.50, suggesting a potential downside of 21.88%. Given Calumet Specialty Products Partners' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Calumet Specialty Products Partners is more favorable than Ferrellgas Partners.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Ferrellgas Partners and Calumet Specialty Products Partners' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ferrellgas Partners	$1.68 billion	0.04	$-64,250,000.00	($0.65)	-1.03
Calumet Specialty Products Partners	$3.45 billion	0.07	$-43,600,000.00	($0.55)	-5.82

Calumet Specialty Products Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Ferrellgas Partners. Calumet Specialty Products Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferrellgas Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

2.2% of Ferrellgas Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.4% of Calumet Specialty Products Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ferrellgas Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Calumet Specialty Products Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Ferrellgas Partners has a beta of 2.39, indicating that its share price is 139% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Calumet Specialty Products Partners has a beta of 2.73, indicating that its share price is 173% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Calumet Specialty Products Partners beats Ferrellgas Partners on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ferrellgas Partners vs. CONSOL Energy Stock

CONSOL Energy (NYSE:CEIX) and Ferrellgas Partners (NYSE:FGP) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

71.9% of CONSOL Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.2% of Ferrellgas Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of CONSOL Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ferrellgas Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

CONSOL Energy has a beta of 2.94, suggesting that its share price is 194% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ferrellgas Partners has a beta of 2.39, suggesting that its share price is 139% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for CONSOL Energy and Ferrellgas Partners, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CONSOL Energy	0	0	2	0	3.00
Ferrellgas Partners	0	0	0	0	N/A

CONSOL Energy presently has a consensus price target of $8.50, suggesting a potential downside of 10.81%. Given CONSOL Energy's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe CONSOL Energy is more favorable than Ferrellgas Partners.

Profitability

This table compares CONSOL Energy and Ferrellgas Partners' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CONSOL Energy	-0.86%	-1.58%	-0.34%
Ferrellgas Partners	-3.23%	N/A	-3.88%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares CONSOL Energy and Ferrellgas Partners' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CONSOL Energy	$1.43 billion	0.17	$76 million	$3.52	2.71
Ferrellgas Partners	$1.68 billion	0.04	$-64,250,000.00	($0.65)	-1.03

CONSOL Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ferrellgas Partners. Ferrellgas Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CONSOL Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

CONSOL Energy beats Ferrellgas Partners on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ferrellgas Partners vs. Newpark Resources Stock

Ferrellgas Partners (NYSE:FGP) and Newpark Resources (NYSE:NR) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Ferrellgas Partners and Newpark Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ferrellgas Partners	-3.23%	N/A	-3.88%
Newpark Resources	-14.37%	-9.36%	-5.93%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Ferrellgas Partners and Newpark Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ferrellgas Partners	$1.68 billion	0.04	$-64,250,000.00	($0.65)	-1.03
Newpark Resources	$820.12 million	0.32	$-12,950,000.00	$0.08	35.63

Newpark Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ferrellgas Partners. Ferrellgas Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Newpark Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

2.2% of Ferrellgas Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.2% of Newpark Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ferrellgas Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Newpark Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Ferrellgas Partners has a beta of 2.39, meaning that its share price is 139% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Newpark Resources has a beta of 3.91, meaning that its share price is 291% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Ferrellgas Partners and Newpark Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ferrellgas Partners	0	0	0	0	N/A
Newpark Resources	0	2	0	1	2.67

Newpark Resources has a consensus price target of $3.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.26%. Given Newpark Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Newpark Resources is more favorable than Ferrellgas Partners.

Summary

Newpark Resources beats Ferrellgas Partners on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ferrellgas Partners vs. Golar LNG Partners Stock

Ferrellgas Partners (NYSE:FGP) and Golar LNG Partners (NASDAQ:GMLP) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

Risk & Volatility

Ferrellgas Partners has a beta of 2.39, indicating that its stock price is 139% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Golar LNG Partners has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Ferrellgas Partners and Golar LNG Partners' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ferrellgas Partners	-3.23%	N/A	-3.88%
Golar LNG Partners	9.97%	13.04%	3.44%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for Ferrellgas Partners and Golar LNG Partners, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ferrellgas Partners	0	0	0	0	N/A
Golar LNG Partners	0	3	2	0	2.40

Golar LNG Partners has a consensus price target of $4.1375, indicating a potential upside of 21.69%. Given Golar LNG Partners' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Golar LNG Partners is more favorable than Ferrellgas Partners.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

2.2% of Ferrellgas Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.0% of Golar LNG Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ferrellgas Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Ferrellgas Partners and Golar LNG Partners' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ferrellgas Partners	$1.68 billion	0.04	$-64,250,000.00	($0.65)	-1.03
Golar LNG Partners	$299.65 million	0.79	$17.81 million	$0.81	4.20

Golar LNG Partners has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ferrellgas Partners. Ferrellgas Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golar LNG Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Golar LNG Partners beats Ferrellgas Partners on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ferrellgas Partners vs. Mammoth Energy Services Stock

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and Ferrellgas Partners (NYSE:FGP) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Mammoth Energy Services and Ferrellgas Partners, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mammoth Energy Services	0	0	0	0	N/A
Ferrellgas Partners	0	0	0	0	N/A

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Mammoth Energy Services and Ferrellgas Partners' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services	$625.01 million	0.34	$-79,040,000.00	N/A	N/A
Ferrellgas Partners	$1.68 billion	0.04	$-64,250,000.00	($0.65)	-1.03

Ferrellgas Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services.

Profitability

This table compares Mammoth Energy Services and Ferrellgas Partners' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services	-57.79%	-13.39%	-9.27%
Ferrellgas Partners	-3.23%	N/A	-3.88%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

64.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.2% of Ferrellgas Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ferrellgas Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.85, indicating that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ferrellgas Partners has a beta of 2.39, indicating that its stock price is 139% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Ferrellgas Partners beats Mammoth Energy Services on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ferrellgas Partners vs. RGC Resources Stock

Ferrellgas Partners (NYSE:FGP) and RGC Resources (NASDAQ:RGCO) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Ferrellgas Partners and RGC Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ferrellgas Partners	$1.68 billion	0.04	$-64,250,000.00	($0.65)	-1.03
RGC Resources	$68.03 million	2.92	$8.70 million	$1.08	22.53

RGC Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ferrellgas Partners. Ferrellgas Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RGC Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Ferrellgas Partners and RGC Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ferrellgas Partners	0	0	0	0	N/A
RGC Resources	0	0	0	0	N/A

Profitability

This table compares Ferrellgas Partners and RGC Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ferrellgas Partners	-3.23%	N/A	-3.88%
RGC Resources	17.97%	12.97%	4.24%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

2.2% of Ferrellgas Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ferrellgas Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of RGC Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Ferrellgas Partners has a beta of 2.39, meaning that its stock price is 139% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RGC Resources has a beta of -0.47, meaning that its stock price is 147% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

RGC Resources beats Ferrellgas Partners on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.