S&P 500   3,768.25
DOW   30,814.26
QQQ   311.86
pixel
S&P 500   3,768.25
DOW   30,814.26
QQQ   311.86
pixel
S&P 500   3,768.25
DOW   30,814.26
QQQ   311.86
pixel
S&P 500   3,768.25
DOW   30,814.26
QQQ   311.86
pixel
Log in
NYSE:FGP

Ferrellgas Partners Competitors

$0.67
+0.08 (+13.56 %)
(As of 01/15/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$0.51
Now: $0.67
$0.67
50-Day Range
$0.25
MA: $0.33
$0.55
52-Week Range
$0.30
Now: $0.67
$1.87
Volume631,527 shs
Average Volume488,367 shs
Market Capitalization$65.09 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.39

Competitors

Ferrellgas Partners (NYSE:FGP) Vs. CLMT, CEIX, NR, GMLP, TUSK, and RGCO

Should you be buying FGP stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "oils/energy" are considered alternatives and competitors to Ferrellgas Partners, including Calumet Specialty Products Partners (CLMT), CONSOL Energy (CEIX), Newpark Resources (NR), Golar LNG Partners (GMLP), Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK), and RGC Resources (RGCO).

Ferrellgas Partners (NYSE:FGP) and Calumet Specialty Products Partners (NASDAQ:CLMT) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Ferrellgas Partners and Calumet Specialty Products Partners' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ferrellgas Partners-3.23%N/A-3.88%
Calumet Specialty Products Partners-4.24%-314.00%-4.77%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Ferrellgas Partners and Calumet Specialty Products Partners, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ferrellgas Partners0000N/A
Calumet Specialty Products Partners03002.00

Calumet Specialty Products Partners has a consensus target price of $2.50, suggesting a potential downside of 21.88%. Given Calumet Specialty Products Partners' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Calumet Specialty Products Partners is more favorable than Ferrellgas Partners.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Ferrellgas Partners and Calumet Specialty Products Partners' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ferrellgas Partners$1.68 billion0.04$-64,250,000.00($0.65)-1.03
Calumet Specialty Products Partners$3.45 billion0.07$-43,600,000.00($0.55)-5.82

Calumet Specialty Products Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Ferrellgas Partners. Calumet Specialty Products Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferrellgas Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

2.2% of Ferrellgas Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.4% of Calumet Specialty Products Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ferrellgas Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Calumet Specialty Products Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Ferrellgas Partners has a beta of 2.39, indicating that its share price is 139% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Calumet Specialty Products Partners has a beta of 2.73, indicating that its share price is 173% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Calumet Specialty Products Partners beats Ferrellgas Partners on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

CONSOL Energy (NYSE:CEIX) and Ferrellgas Partners (NYSE:FGP) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

71.9% of CONSOL Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.2% of Ferrellgas Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of CONSOL Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ferrellgas Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

CONSOL Energy has a beta of 2.94, suggesting that its share price is 194% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ferrellgas Partners has a beta of 2.39, suggesting that its share price is 139% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for CONSOL Energy and Ferrellgas Partners, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CONSOL Energy00203.00
Ferrellgas Partners0000N/A

CONSOL Energy presently has a consensus price target of $8.50, suggesting a potential downside of 10.81%. Given CONSOL Energy's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe CONSOL Energy is more favorable than Ferrellgas Partners.

Profitability

This table compares CONSOL Energy and Ferrellgas Partners' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CONSOL Energy-0.86%-1.58%-0.34%
Ferrellgas Partners-3.23%N/A-3.88%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares CONSOL Energy and Ferrellgas Partners' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CONSOL Energy$1.43 billion0.17$76 million$3.522.71
Ferrellgas Partners$1.68 billion0.04$-64,250,000.00($0.65)-1.03

CONSOL Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ferrellgas Partners. Ferrellgas Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CONSOL Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

CONSOL Energy beats Ferrellgas Partners on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ferrellgas Partners (NYSE:FGP) and Newpark Resources (NYSE:NR) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Ferrellgas Partners and Newpark Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ferrellgas Partners-3.23%N/A-3.88%
Newpark Resources-14.37%-9.36%-5.93%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Ferrellgas Partners and Newpark Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ferrellgas Partners$1.68 billion0.04$-64,250,000.00($0.65)-1.03
Newpark Resources$820.12 million0.32$-12,950,000.00$0.0835.63

Newpark Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ferrellgas Partners. Ferrellgas Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Newpark Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

2.2% of Ferrellgas Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.2% of Newpark Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ferrellgas Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Newpark Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Ferrellgas Partners has a beta of 2.39, meaning that its share price is 139% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Newpark Resources has a beta of 3.91, meaning that its share price is 291% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Ferrellgas Partners and Newpark Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ferrellgas Partners0000N/A
Newpark Resources02012.67

Newpark Resources has a consensus price target of $3.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.26%. Given Newpark Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Newpark Resources is more favorable than Ferrellgas Partners.

Summary

Newpark Resources beats Ferrellgas Partners on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ferrellgas Partners (NYSE:FGP) and Golar LNG Partners (NASDAQ:GMLP) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

Risk & Volatility

Ferrellgas Partners has a beta of 2.39, indicating that its stock price is 139% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Golar LNG Partners has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Ferrellgas Partners and Golar LNG Partners' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ferrellgas Partners-3.23%N/A-3.88%
Golar LNG Partners9.97%13.04%3.44%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for Ferrellgas Partners and Golar LNG Partners, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ferrellgas Partners0000N/A
Golar LNG Partners03202.40

Golar LNG Partners has a consensus price target of $4.1375, indicating a potential upside of 21.69%. Given Golar LNG Partners' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Golar LNG Partners is more favorable than Ferrellgas Partners.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

2.2% of Ferrellgas Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.0% of Golar LNG Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ferrellgas Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Ferrellgas Partners and Golar LNG Partners' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ferrellgas Partners$1.68 billion0.04$-64,250,000.00($0.65)-1.03
Golar LNG Partners$299.65 million0.79$17.81 million$0.814.20

Golar LNG Partners has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ferrellgas Partners. Ferrellgas Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golar LNG Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Golar LNG Partners beats Ferrellgas Partners on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and Ferrellgas Partners (NYSE:FGP) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Mammoth Energy Services and Ferrellgas Partners, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Mammoth Energy Services0000N/A
Ferrellgas Partners0000N/A

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Mammoth Energy Services and Ferrellgas Partners' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services$625.01 million0.34$-79,040,000.00N/AN/A
Ferrellgas Partners$1.68 billion0.04$-64,250,000.00($0.65)-1.03

Ferrellgas Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services.

Profitability

This table compares Mammoth Energy Services and Ferrellgas Partners' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services-57.79%-13.39%-9.27%
Ferrellgas Partners-3.23%N/A-3.88%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

64.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.2% of Ferrellgas Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ferrellgas Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.85, indicating that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ferrellgas Partners has a beta of 2.39, indicating that its stock price is 139% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Ferrellgas Partners beats Mammoth Energy Services on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ferrellgas Partners (NYSE:FGP) and RGC Resources (NASDAQ:RGCO) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Ferrellgas Partners and RGC Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ferrellgas Partners$1.68 billion0.04$-64,250,000.00($0.65)-1.03
RGC Resources$68.03 million2.92$8.70 million$1.0822.53

RGC Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ferrellgas Partners. Ferrellgas Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RGC Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Ferrellgas Partners and RGC Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ferrellgas Partners0000N/A
RGC Resources0000N/A

Profitability

This table compares Ferrellgas Partners and RGC Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ferrellgas Partners-3.23%N/A-3.88%
RGC Resources17.97%12.97%4.24%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

2.2% of Ferrellgas Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ferrellgas Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of RGC Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Ferrellgas Partners has a beta of 2.39, meaning that its stock price is 139% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RGC Resources has a beta of -0.47, meaning that its stock price is 147% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

RGC Resources beats Ferrellgas Partners on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.


Ferrellgas Partners Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Calumet Specialty Products Partners logo
CLMT
Calumet Specialty Products Partners
0.7$3.20+2.2%$249.79 million$3.45 billion-2.44
CONSOL Energy logo
CEIX
CONSOL Energy
1.2$9.53+0.1%$248.16 million$1.43 billion-28.03
Newpark Resources logo
NR
Newpark Resources
1.7$2.85+1.4%$240.63 million$820.12 million-3.24
Golar LNG Partners logo
GMLP
Golar LNG Partners
2.0$3.40+0.3%$235.63 million$299.65 million9.19
Mammoth Energy Services logo
TUSK
Mammoth Energy Services
0.9$4.68+0.4%$214.19 million$625.01 million-1.08
RGC Resources logo
RGCO
RGC Resources
1.1$24.33+0.2%$198.80 million$68.03 million17.38
Natural Resource Partners logo
NRP
Natural Resource Partners
1.6$15.87+5.5%$194.58 million$263.93 million-0.78
Sunworks logo
SUNW
Sunworks
0.7$11.36+10.1%$188.81 million$59.83 million-7.38
Penn Virginia logo
PVAC
Penn Virginia
1.4$12.35+8.8%$187.72 million$471.22 million1.48
SandRidge Energy logo
SD
SandRidge Energy
0.6$5.01+2.8%$180.00 million$266.85 million-0.27Decrease in Short Interest
PBT
Permian Basin Royalty Trust
1.1$3.54+0.6%$165.00 million$20.51 million8.63
TETRA Technologies logo
TTI
TETRA Technologies
1.0$1.30+4.6%$163.77 million$1.04 billion-1.08Decrease in Short Interest
Exterran logo
EXTN
Exterran
1.8$4.90+1.0%$162.32 million$1.32 billion-1.09Increase in Short Interest
SPI
SPI Energy
0.5$8.37+6.9%$156.82 million$97.88 million0.00Increase in Short Interest
San Juan Basin Royalty Trust logo
SJT
San Juan Basin Royalty Trust
0.6$3.25+0.6%$151.48 million$9.93 million29.55Increase in Short Interest
TRCH
Torchlight Energy Resources
0.6$1.37+7.3%$136.08 million$750,000.00-6.85
Flotek Industries logo
FTK
Flotek Industries
0.9$1.86+1.6%$135.96 million$119.35 million-0.73
Ramaco Resources logo
METC
Ramaco Resources
2.3$3.17+0.3%$135.41 million$230.21 million63.40Increase in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
Heavy News Reporting
CONSOL Coal Resources logo
CCR
CONSOL Coal Resources
1.4$4.73+0.0%$130.97 million$332.93 million-31.53Decrease in Short Interest
VAALCO Energy logo
EGY
VAALCO Energy
0.6$2.38+1.7%$129.28 million$84.52 million-3.17Decrease in Short Interest
Natural Gas Services Group logo
NGS
Natural Gas Services Group
1.6$9.14+5.7%$123.11 million$78.44 million65.29Decrease in Short Interest
OEG
Orbital Energy Group
1.0$4.00+4.8%$122.71 million$23.49 million-7.69
Charah Solutions logo
CHRA
Charah Solutions
0.9$3.85+29.6%$115.47 million$554.87 million-2.75High Trading Volume
EPSN
Epsilon Energy
0.6$4.07+0.5%$94.96 million$26.69 million67.84
NINE
Nine Energy Service
0.6$2.95+1.0%$93.11 million$832.94 million-0.15
OPTT
Ocean Power Technologies
0.6$2.88+1.7%$88.70 million$1.68 million-2.18Decrease in Short Interest
NCS Multistage logo
NCSM
NCS Multistage
0.8$36.75+0.5%$86.73 million$205.49 million-1.26
Forum Energy Technologies logo
FET
Forum Energy Technologies
1.1$14.65+3.1%$85.59 million$956.50 million-1.08Increase in Short Interest
Smart Sand logo
SND
Smart Sand
1.4$1.95+2.6%$85.05 million$233.07 million4.33
TransGlobe Energy logo
TGA
TransGlobe Energy
1.0$1.17+0.9%$84.87 million$278.93 million-1.15Analyst Report
Blueknight Energy Partners logo
BKEP
Blueknight Energy Partners
0.9$2.02+0.0%$83.22 million$371.07 million-14.43
Aemetis logo
AMTX
Aemetis
0.6$3.62+3.3%$78.99 million$202 million-2.59Increase in Short Interest
PNRG
PrimeEnergy Resources
1.0$39.07+0.7%$77.91 million$104.82 million12.78
Ranger Energy Services logo
RNGR
Ranger Energy Services
1.3$4.80+1.5%$73.90 million$336.90 million-9.60
KLXE
KLX Energy Services
1.3$9.51+5.5%$72.17 million$544 million-0.14
SilverBow Resources logo
SBOW
SilverBow Resources
1.7$5.82+4.8%$69.47 million$288.63 million-0.25Decrease in Short Interest
Mid-Con Energy Partners logo
MCEP
Mid-Con Energy Partners
0.5$5.22+3.3%$69.41 million$55.50 million-0.63
Summit Midstream Partners logo
SMLP
Summit Midstream Partners
0.7$17.32+2.4%$65.38 million$443.53 million-5.83Increase in Short Interest
PHX
PHX Minerals
1.4$2.83+3.9%$63.36 million$66.04 million-0.61Increase in Short Interest
BPT
BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust
0.7$2.95+2.4%$63.13 million$48.97 million2.27Increase in Short Interest
Dawson Geophysical logo
DWSN
Dawson Geophysical
0.7$2.59+3.5%$60.34 million$145.77 million-5.40
CSI Compressco logo
CCLP
CSI Compressco
0.6$1.20+2.5%$56.82 million$476.58 million-1.11
Gulf Island Fabrication logo
GIFI
Gulf Island Fabrication
0.8$3.55+2.8%$54.40 million$303.31 million-1.17
USWS
U.S. Well Services
1.4$0.70+5.7%$51.70 million$514.76 million-0.15
Profire Energy logo
PFIE
Profire Energy
0.7$1.05+3.8%$50.36 million$38.98 million-26.25
MV Oil Trust logo
MVO
MV Oil Trust
1.0$3.96+2.5%$50.14 million$12.99 million4.26
VOC Energy Trust logo
VOC
VOC Energy Trust
1.1$2.93+0.0%$49.81 million$9.21 million5.43
CRT
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
1.1$8.26+2.5%$49.56 million$5.96 million10.33Decrease in Short Interest
Hallador Energy logo
HNRG
Hallador Energy
1.7$1.48+4.7%$46 million$323.46 million-0.74Increase in Short Interest
ION Geophysical logo
IO
ION Geophysical
0.9$3.20+0.6%$45.58 million$174.68 million-1.18
This page was last updated on 1/18/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.