Horizon Global Competitors

Standard Motor Products (NYSE:SMP) and Horizon Global (NYSE:HZN) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Standard Motor Products and Horizon Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Standard Motor Products and Horizon Global, as provided by MarketBeat.

Standard Motor Products presently has a consensus target price of $50.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 18.82%. Horizon Global has a consensus target price of $1.00, suggesting a potential downside of 89.55%. Given Standard Motor Products' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Standard Motor Products is more favorable than Horizon Global.

Risk and Volatility

Standard Motor Products has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Horizon Global has a beta of 2.03, meaning that its stock price is 103% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Standard Motor Products and Horizon Global's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Horizon Global has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Standard Motor Products.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

77.4% of Standard Motor Products shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Horizon Global shares are held by institutional investors. 6.4% of Standard Motor Products shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Horizon Global shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Standard Motor Products beats Horizon Global on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Tenneco (NYSE:TEN) and Horizon Global (NYSE:HZN) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Tenneco and Horizon Global, as reported by MarketBeat.

Tenneco presently has a consensus price target of $9.6667, indicating a potential downside of 10.24%. Horizon Global has a consensus price target of $1.00, indicating a potential downside of 89.55%. Given Tenneco's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Tenneco is more favorable than Horizon Global.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Tenneco and Horizon Global's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Horizon Global has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tenneco.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

66.3% of Tenneco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Horizon Global shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Tenneco shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Horizon Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Tenneco has a beta of 2.68, meaning that its share price is 168% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Horizon Global has a beta of 2.03, meaning that its share price is 103% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Tenneco and Horizon Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Tenneco beats Horizon Global on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Stoneridge (NYSE:SRI) and Horizon Global (NYSE:HZN) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Stoneridge and Horizon Global's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Horizon Global has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Stoneridge.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Stoneridge and Horizon Global, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Stoneridge presently has a consensus price target of $32.50, indicating a potential upside of 5.31%. Horizon Global has a consensus price target of $1.00, indicating a potential downside of 89.55%. Given Stoneridge's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Stoneridge is more favorable than Horizon Global.

Risk and Volatility

Stoneridge has a beta of 1.58, indicating that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Horizon Global has a beta of 2.03, indicating that its stock price is 103% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

95.3% of Stoneridge shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Horizon Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.6% of Stoneridge shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Horizon Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Stoneridge and Horizon Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Stoneridge beats Horizon Global on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Modine Manufacturing (NYSE:MOD) and Horizon Global (NYSE:HZN) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

83.3% of Modine Manufacturing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Horizon Global shares are held by institutional investors. 5.4% of Modine Manufacturing shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Horizon Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Modine Manufacturing and Horizon Global, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Modine Manufacturing presently has a consensus target price of $11.50, suggesting a potential downside of 24.74%. Horizon Global has a consensus target price of $1.00, suggesting a potential downside of 89.55%. Given Modine Manufacturing's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Modine Manufacturing is more favorable than Horizon Global.

Profitability

This table compares Modine Manufacturing and Horizon Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Modine Manufacturing has a beta of 2.82, suggesting that its stock price is 182% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Horizon Global has a beta of 2.03, suggesting that its stock price is 103% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Modine Manufacturing and Horizon Global's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Horizon Global has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Modine Manufacturing.

Summary

Modine Manufacturing beats Horizon Global on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lydall (NYSE:LDL) and Horizon Global (NYSE:HZN) are both small-cap multi-sector conglomerates companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Lydall and Horizon Global, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Lydall presently has a consensus target price of $26.00, suggesting a potential downside of 17.64%. Horizon Global has a consensus target price of $1.00, suggesting a potential downside of 89.55%. Given Lydall's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Lydall is more favorable than Horizon Global.

Volatility and Risk

Lydall has a beta of 3.06, meaning that its share price is 206% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Horizon Global has a beta of 2.03, meaning that its share price is 103% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

93.3% of Lydall shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.8% of Horizon Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Lydall shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Horizon Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Lydall and Horizon Global's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Horizon Global has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lydall.

Profitability

This table compares Lydall and Horizon Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Lydall beats Horizon Global on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Horizon Global (NYSE:HZN) and Cooper-Standard (NYSE:CPS) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Horizon Global and Cooper-Standard, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Horizon Global presently has a consensus target price of $1.00, indicating a potential downside of 89.55%. Cooper-Standard has a consensus target price of $30.00, indicating a potential downside of 11.11%. Given Cooper-Standard's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cooper-Standard is more favorable than Horizon Global.

Profitability

This table compares Horizon Global and Cooper-Standard's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

41.8% of Horizon Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Cooper-Standard shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.7% of Horizon Global shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Cooper-Standard shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Horizon Global and Cooper-Standard's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Horizon Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cooper-Standard.

Volatility and Risk

Horizon Global has a beta of 2.03, indicating that its stock price is 103% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cooper-Standard has a beta of 3.21, indicating that its stock price is 221% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Cooper-Standard beats Horizon Global on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.