Skip to main content
NYSE:KL

Kirkland Lake Gold Competitors

$41.47
+0.87 (+2.14 %)
(As of 05/14/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$40.85
$41.58
50-Day Range
$31.88
$41.55
52-Week Range
$31.72
$57.69
Volume1.66 million shs
Average Volume1.98 million shs
Market Capitalization$11.07 billion
P/E Ratio14.60
Dividend Yield1.85%
Beta0.72

Competitors

Kirkland Lake Gold (NYSE:KL) Vs. GOLD, FNV, WPM, AEM, SBSW, and GFI

Should you be buying KL stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "gold & silver ores" are considered alternatives and competitors to Kirkland Lake Gold, including Barrick Gold (GOLD), Franco-Nevada (FNV), Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM), Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), Sibanye Stillwater (SBSW), and Gold Fields (GFI).

Barrick Gold (NYSE:GOLD) and Kirkland Lake Gold (NYSE:KL) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and risk.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Barrick Gold and Kirkland Lake Gold's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Barrick Gold$9.72 billion4.40$3.97 billion$0.5147.10
Kirkland Lake Gold$1.38 billion8.03$560.08 million$2.7415.14

Barrick Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Kirkland Lake Gold. Kirkland Lake Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Barrick Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Barrick Gold and Kirkland Lake Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Barrick Gold24.81%5.63%3.82%
Kirkland Lake Gold33.21%21.03%15.33%

Dividends

Barrick Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Kirkland Lake Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Barrick Gold pays out 47.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kirkland Lake Gold pays out 27.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Barrick Gold has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Kirkland Lake Gold has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Kirkland Lake Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

60.9% of Barrick Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.6% of Kirkland Lake Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Barrick Gold has a beta of -0.02, suggesting that its share price is 102% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kirkland Lake Gold has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its share price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Barrick Gold and Kirkland Lake Gold, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Barrick Gold011213.00
Kirkland Lake Gold11802.70

Barrick Gold currently has a consensus target price of $29.9687, suggesting a potential upside of 24.77%. Kirkland Lake Gold has a consensus target price of $70.00, suggesting a potential upside of 68.80%. Given Kirkland Lake Gold's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Kirkland Lake Gold is more favorable than Barrick Gold.

Summary

Kirkland Lake Gold beats Barrick Gold on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kirkland Lake Gold (NYSE:KL) and Franco-Nevada (NYSE:FNV) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Kirkland Lake Gold and Franco-Nevada's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kirkland Lake Gold33.21%21.03%15.33%
Franco-Nevada26.99%9.17%8.92%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Kirkland Lake Gold and Franco-Nevada, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kirkland Lake Gold11802.70
Franco-Nevada06502.45

Kirkland Lake Gold presently has a consensus price target of $70.00, indicating a potential upside of 68.80%. Franco-Nevada has a consensus price target of $161.7273, indicating a potential upside of 8.13%. Given Kirkland Lake Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Kirkland Lake Gold is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Risk & Volatility

Kirkland Lake Gold has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its share price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its share price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Kirkland Lake Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of $0.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Kirkland Lake Gold pays out 27.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Franco-Nevada pays out 42.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kirkland Lake Gold has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Franco-Nevada has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Kirkland Lake Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

50.6% of Kirkland Lake Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.8% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Kirkland Lake Gold and Franco-Nevada's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kirkland Lake Gold$1.38 billion8.03$560.08 million$2.7415.14
Franco-Nevada$844.10 million33.85$344.10 million$1.8282.18

Kirkland Lake Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Franco-Nevada. Kirkland Lake Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Kirkland Lake Gold beats Franco-Nevada on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Wheaton Precious Metals (NYSE:WPM) and Kirkland Lake Gold (NYSE:KL) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Wheaton Precious Metals and Kirkland Lake Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Wheaton Precious Metals37.30%6.50%5.56%
Kirkland Lake Gold33.21%21.03%15.33%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Wheaton Precious Metals and Kirkland Lake Gold's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wheaton Precious Metals$861.33 million23.62$86.14 million$0.5680.71
Kirkland Lake Gold$1.38 billion8.03$560.08 million$2.7415.14

Kirkland Lake Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Wheaton Precious Metals. Kirkland Lake Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

59.5% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.6% of Kirkland Lake Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kirkland Lake Gold has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Wheaton Precious Metals and Kirkland Lake Gold, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Wheaton Precious Metals041102.73
Kirkland Lake Gold11802.70

Wheaton Precious Metals presently has a consensus price target of $57.7273, indicating a potential upside of 27.72%. Kirkland Lake Gold has a consensus price target of $70.00, indicating a potential upside of 68.80%. Given Kirkland Lake Gold's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Kirkland Lake Gold is more favorable than Wheaton Precious Metals.

Dividends

Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Kirkland Lake Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 57.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kirkland Lake Gold pays out 27.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Wheaton Precious Metals has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Kirkland Lake Gold has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Kirkland Lake Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Kirkland Lake Gold beats Wheaton Precious Metals on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kirkland Lake Gold (NYSE:KL) and Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Kirkland Lake Gold and Agnico Eagle Mines, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kirkland Lake Gold11802.70
Agnico Eagle Mines03602.67

Kirkland Lake Gold presently has a consensus target price of $70.00, suggesting a potential upside of 68.80%. Agnico Eagle Mines has a consensus target price of $87.8571, suggesting a potential upside of 25.47%. Given Kirkland Lake Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kirkland Lake Gold is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

50.6% of Kirkland Lake Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.6% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Kirkland Lake Gold has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Kirkland Lake Gold and Agnico Eagle Mines' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kirkland Lake Gold$1.38 billion8.03$560.08 million$2.7415.14
Agnico Eagle Mines$2.49 billion6.84$473.17 million$0.9772.19

Kirkland Lake Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Agnico Eagle Mines. Kirkland Lake Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agnico Eagle Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Kirkland Lake Gold and Agnico Eagle Mines' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kirkland Lake Gold33.21%21.03%15.33%
Agnico Eagle Mines21.54%7.22%4.10%

Dividends

Kirkland Lake Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Kirkland Lake Gold pays out 27.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 77.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kirkland Lake Gold has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Agnico Eagle Mines has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Kirkland Lake Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Kirkland Lake Gold beats Agnico Eagle Mines on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sibanye Stillwater (NYSE:SBSW) and Kirkland Lake Gold (NYSE:KL) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and dividends.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

10.7% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.6% of Kirkland Lake Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Sibanye Stillwater pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. Kirkland Lake Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Kirkland Lake Gold pays out 27.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sibanye Stillwater has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Kirkland Lake Gold has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Risk and Volatility

Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kirkland Lake Gold has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Sibanye Stillwater and Kirkland Lake Gold, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sibanye Stillwater00403.00
Kirkland Lake Gold11802.70

Sibanye Stillwater presently has a consensus target price of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.35%. Kirkland Lake Gold has a consensus target price of $70.00, suggesting a potential upside of 68.80%. Given Kirkland Lake Gold's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Kirkland Lake Gold is more favorable than Sibanye Stillwater.

Profitability

This table compares Sibanye Stillwater and Kirkland Lake Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sibanye StillwaterN/AN/AN/A
Kirkland Lake Gold33.21%21.03%15.33%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Sibanye Stillwater and Kirkland Lake Gold's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sibanye Stillwater$5.04 billion2.71$4.30 millionN/AN/A
Kirkland Lake Gold$1.38 billion8.03$560.08 million$2.7415.14

Kirkland Lake Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sibanye Stillwater.

Summary

Kirkland Lake Gold beats Sibanye Stillwater on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kirkland Lake Gold (NYSE:KL) and Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and risk.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Kirkland Lake Gold and Gold Fields' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kirkland Lake Gold$1.38 billion8.03$560.08 million$2.7415.14
Gold Fields$2.97 billion3.36$161.60 million$0.4226.71

Kirkland Lake Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gold Fields. Kirkland Lake Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gold Fields, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Kirkland Lake Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Kirkland Lake Gold pays out 27.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gold Fields pays out 81.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kirkland Lake Gold has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Gold Fields has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Kirkland Lake Gold and Gold Fields' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kirkland Lake Gold33.21%21.03%15.33%
Gold FieldsN/AN/AN/A

Volatility and Risk

Kirkland Lake Gold has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gold Fields has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Kirkland Lake Gold and Gold Fields, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kirkland Lake Gold11802.70
Gold Fields03202.40

Kirkland Lake Gold presently has a consensus price target of $70.00, indicating a potential upside of 68.80%. Gold Fields has a consensus price target of $13.1375, indicating a potential upside of 17.09%. Given Kirkland Lake Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Kirkland Lake Gold is more favorable than Gold Fields.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

50.6% of Kirkland Lake Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.4% of Gold Fields shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Kirkland Lake Gold beats Gold Fields on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.


Kirkland Lake Gold Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Barrick Gold logo
GOLD
Barrick Gold
2.0$24.02+1.8%$42.72 billion$9.72 billion14.13
Franco-Nevada logo
FNV
Franco-Nevada
1.9$149.57+1.4%$28.57 billion$844.10 million107.61Dividend Increase
Wheaton Precious Metals logo
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals
2.2$45.20+2.9%$20.34 billion$861.33 million57.22Dividend Increase
Agnico Eagle Mines logo
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines
1.9$70.02+1.6%$17.07 billion$2.49 billion26.62Analyst Upgrade
Sibanye Stillwater logo
SBSW
Sibanye Stillwater
2.4$18.47+3.3%$13.64 billion$5.04 billion0.00Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Downgrade
Gold Fields logo
GFI
Gold Fields
1.9$11.22+5.4%$9.96 billion$2.97 billion26.71Analyst Upgrade
Unusual Options Activity
Gap Down
AngloGold Ashanti logo
AU
AngloGold Ashanti
2.5$23.71+3.9%$9.95 billion$3.53 billion26.05Analyst Upgrade
Kinross Gold logo
KGC
Kinross Gold
2.2$7.78+3.6%$9.81 billion$3.50 billion9.15Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Down
Pan American Silver logo
PAAS
Pan American Silver
1.8$30.95+3.7%$6.51 billion$1.35 billion106.73Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
News Coverage
Yamana Gold logo
AUY
Yamana Gold
2.3$5.12+2.9%$4.94 billion$1.61 billion39.39
First Majestic Silver logo
AG
First Majestic Silver
1.3$16.00+3.8%$4.02 billion$363.94 million-64.00Dividend Announcement
Alamos Gold logo
AGI
Alamos Gold
2.2$8.70+3.3%$3.42 billion$683.10 million32.22Analyst Upgrade
Harmony Gold Mining logo
HMY
Harmony Gold Mining
1.3$4.99+4.2%$3.07 billion$2.02 billion-49.90Analyst Downgrade
Osisko Gold Royalties logo
OR
Osisko Gold Royalties
2.5$13.75+1.7%$2.30 billion$295.86 million-18.58Earnings Announcement
Dividend Increase
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Coeur Mining logo
CDE
Coeur Mining
1.3$9.29+5.7%$2.26 billion$711.50 million-8.60Gap Down
Eldorado Gold logo
EGO
Eldorado Gold
1.8$11.12+2.7%$2.02 billion$617.80 million10.80
Sandstorm Gold logo
SAND
Sandstorm Gold
1.7$8.31+3.1%$1.62 billion$89.43 million207.80Gap Down
IAMGOLD logo
IAG
IAMGOLD
1.7$3.35+3.3%$1.60 billion$1.07 billion-4.19
Seabridge Gold logo
SA
Seabridge Gold
1.2$18.06+3.7%$1.35 billionN/A-258.00News Coverage
Gap Down
Fortuna Silver Mines logo
FSM
Fortuna Silver Mines
1.4$6.32+3.8%$1.17 billion$257.19 million48.62Earnings Announcement
Endeavour Silver logo
EXK
Endeavour Silver
1.3$5.98+6.4%$984.94 million$121.72 million-23.00Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
Gap Down
DRDGOLD logo
DRD
DRDGOLD
1.7$11.38+7.6%$983.90 million$269.51 million21.88Analyst Report
Gap Down
Maverix Metals logo
MMX
Maverix Metals
1.5$5.95+3.9%$839.87 million$33.24 million119.00Earnings Announcement
McEwen Mining logo
MUX
McEwen Mining
1.3$1.25+2.4%$573.98 million$117.02 million-3.21Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Corvus Gold logo
KOR
Corvus Gold
1.8$2.73+2.6%$346.20 millionN/A-21.00News Coverage
HYMC
Hycroft Mining
1.8$3.50+0.0%$209.65 millionN/A0.00Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
Fury Gold Mines logo
FURY
Fury Gold Mines
1.4$1.27+3.5%$160.26 millionN/A-11.14Upcoming Earnings
Gap Up
Fury Gold Mines logo
FURY
Fury Gold Mines
1.7N/AN/A$160.26 millionN/A-11.14Gap Up
CHNR
China Natural Resources
0.4$1.30+5.4%$32.38 million$1.86 million0.00
This page was last updated on 5/15/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more about MarketBeat.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.