S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
Log in
NYSE:NTCO

Natura &Co Competitors

$16.56
-0.15 (-0.90 %)
(As of 03/4/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$16.53
Now: $16.56
$17.52
50-Day Range
$16.45
MA: $18.45
$19.91
52-Week Range
$7.93
Now: $16.56
$20.68
Volume565,605 shs
Average Volume395,517 shs
Market Capitalization$11.39 billion
P/E Ratio184.00
Dividend YieldN/A
BetaN/A

Competitors

Natura &Co (NYSE:NTCO) Vs. KHC, MNST, KMB, KDP, STZ.B, and ABEV

Should you be buying NTCO stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "consumer staples" are considered alternatives and competitors to Natura &Co, including The Kraft Heinz (KHC), Monster Beverage (MNST), Kimberly-Clark (KMB), Keurig Dr Pepper (KDP), Constellation Brands (STZ.B), and Ambev (ABEV).

Natura &Co (NYSE:NTCO) and The Kraft Heinz (NASDAQ:KHC) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Natura &Co and The Kraft Heinz's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Natura &CoN/AN/AN/A
The Kraft Heinz-1.92%6.80%3.41%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Natura &Co and The Kraft Heinz's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Natura &Co$3.66 billion3.11$39.40 million$0.09184.00
The Kraft Heinz$24.98 billion1.82$1.94 billion$2.8513.06

The Kraft Heinz has higher revenue and earnings than Natura &Co. The Kraft Heinz is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Natura &Co, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Natura &Co and The Kraft Heinz, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Natura &Co10001.00
The Kraft Heinz25702.36

The Kraft Heinz has a consensus price target of $36.7143, suggesting a potential downside of 1.33%. Given The Kraft Heinz's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe The Kraft Heinz is more favorable than Natura &Co.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

4.8% of Natura &Co shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.9% of The Kraft Heinz shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of The Kraft Heinz shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

The Kraft Heinz beats Natura &Co on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Monster Beverage (NASDAQ:MNST) and Natura &Co (NYSE:NTCO) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Monster Beverage and Natura &Co's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Monster Beverage26.99%28.24%22.80%
Natura &CoN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Monster Beverage and Natura &Co, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Monster Beverage051402.74
Natura &Co10001.00

Monster Beverage presently has a consensus price target of $94.1579, indicating a potential upside of 11.19%. Given Monster Beverage's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Monster Beverage is more favorable than Natura &Co.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

63.6% of Monster Beverage shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.8% of Natura &Co shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.6% of Monster Beverage shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Monster Beverage and Natura &Co's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Monster Beverage$4.20 billion10.65$1.11 billion$2.0341.71
Natura &Co$3.66 billion3.11$39.40 million$0.09184.00

Monster Beverage has higher revenue and earnings than Natura &Co. Monster Beverage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Natura &Co, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Monster Beverage beats Natura &Co on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kimberly-Clark (NYSE:KMB) and Natura &Co (NYSE:NTCO) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Kimberly-Clark and Natura &Co's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kimberly-Clark12.49%812.50%16.74%
Natura &CoN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Kimberly-Clark and Natura &Co, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kimberly-Clark17402.25
Natura &Co10001.00

Kimberly-Clark presently has a consensus target price of $150.2727, suggesting a potential upside of 16.78%. Given Kimberly-Clark's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Kimberly-Clark is more favorable than Natura &Co.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Kimberly-Clark and Natura &Co's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kimberly-Clark$18.45 billion2.36$2.16 billion$6.8918.68
Natura &Co$3.66 billion3.11$39.40 million$0.09184.00

Kimberly-Clark has higher revenue and earnings than Natura &Co. Kimberly-Clark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Natura &Co, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

71.9% of Kimberly-Clark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.8% of Natura &Co shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Kimberly-Clark shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Kimberly-Clark beats Natura &Co on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Natura &Co (NYSE:NTCO) and Keurig Dr Pepper (NASDAQ:KDP) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Natura &Co and Keurig Dr Pepper, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Natura &Co10001.00
Keurig Dr Pepper03802.73

Keurig Dr Pepper has a consensus price target of $34.00, suggesting a potential upside of 10.10%. Given Keurig Dr Pepper's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Keurig Dr Pepper is more favorable than Natura &Co.

Profitability

This table compares Natura &Co and Keurig Dr Pepper's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Natura &CoN/AN/AN/A
Keurig Dr Pepper11.40%8.33%3.90%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Natura &Co and Keurig Dr Pepper's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Natura &Co$3.66 billion3.11$39.40 million$0.09184.00
Keurig Dr Pepper$11.12 billion3.91$1.25 billion$1.2225.31

Keurig Dr Pepper has higher revenue and earnings than Natura &Co. Keurig Dr Pepper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Natura &Co, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

4.8% of Natura &Co shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.9% of Keurig Dr Pepper shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Keurig Dr Pepper shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Keurig Dr Pepper beats Natura &Co on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Constellation Brands (NYSE:STZ.B) and Natura &Co (NYSE:NTCO) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Constellation Brands and Natura &Co's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Constellation Brands$9.11 billion4.68$-11,800,000.00N/AN/A
Natura &Co$3.66 billion3.11$39.40 million$0.09184.00

Natura &Co has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Constellation Brands.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Constellation Brands and Natura &Co, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Constellation Brands0000N/A
Natura &Co10001.00

Profitability

This table compares Constellation Brands and Natura &Co's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Constellation Brands21.63%16.09%7.41%
Natura &CoN/AN/AN/A

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.0% of Constellation Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.8% of Natura &Co shares are held by institutional investors. 96.8% of Constellation Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Constellation Brands beats Natura &Co on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Natura &Co (NYSE:NTCO) and Ambev (NYSE:ABEV) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

4.8% of Natura &Co shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.3% of Ambev shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Natura &Co and Ambev's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Natura &Co$3.66 billion3.11$39.40 million$0.09184.00
Ambev$12.78 billion3.27$2.99 billion$0.1914.00

Ambev has higher revenue and earnings than Natura &Co. Ambev is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Natura &Co, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Natura &Co and Ambev, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Natura &Co10001.00
Ambev21302.17

Profitability

This table compares Natura &Co and Ambev's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Natura &CoN/AN/AN/A
Ambev16.33%13.86%8.66%

Summary

Ambev beats Natura &Co on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.


Natura &Co Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
The Kraft Heinz logo
KHC
The Kraft Heinz
1.7$37.21-2.1%$45.51 billion$24.98 billion-93.02
Monster Beverage logo
MNST
Monster Beverage
1.8$84.68-0.1%$44.72 billion$4.20 billion37.97Analyst Upgrade
Kimberly-Clark logo
KMB
Kimberly-Clark
2.5$128.68-0.5%$43.54 billion$18.45 billion18.70
Keurig Dr Pepper logo
KDP
Keurig Dr Pepper
1.8$30.88-0.8%$43.46 billion$11.12 billion33.57Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
STZ.B
Constellation Brands
1.1$220.17-0.0%$42.67 billion$9.11 billion21.44
Ambev logo
ABEV
Ambev
1.6$2.66-4.1%$41.83 billion$12.78 billion22.17Analyst Downgrade
High Trading Volume
Gap Down
Constellation Brands logo
STZ
Constellation Brands
2.1$211.15-2.3%$40.94 billion$9.11 billion20.56Increase in Short Interest
Sysco logo
SYY
Sysco
2.0$79.42-2.6%$40.54 billion$52.89 billion-1,134.41
Chewy logo
CHWY
Chewy
1.4$87.65-4.5%$36.17 billion$4.85 billion-203.83
General Mills logo
GIS
General Mills
2.1$55.29-0.7%$33.81 billion$17.63 billion14.18Unusual Options Activity
Corteva logo
CTVA
Corteva
1.9$43.85-3.4%$32.63 billion$13.85 billion53.48
International Flavors & Fragrances logo
IFF
International Flavors & Fragrances
2.3$130.89-0.6%$32.56 billion$5.14 billion39.19Decrease in Short Interest
Archer-Daniels-Midland logo
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland
2.3$55.49-2.9%$30.99 billion$64.66 billion19.61Increase in Short Interest
The Hershey logo
HSY
The Hershey
1.8$146.09-1.2%$30.26 billion$7.99 billion25.63Insider Selling
Decrease in Short Interest
Tyson Foods logo
TSN
Tyson Foods
2.1$72.19-3.1%$26.35 billion$43.19 billion12.32
Fomento Económico Mexicano logo
FMX
Fomento Económico Mexicano
1.6$72.17-3.6%$25.82 billion$26.33 billion72.90
Hormel Foods logo
HRL
Hormel Foods
2.0$46.96-0.1%$25.35 billion$9.61 billion28.12Insider Selling
Decrease in Short Interest
Coca-Cola European Partners logo
CCEP
Coca-Cola European Partners
1.4$50.74-0.8%$24.58 billion$13.46 billion17.93Increase in Short Interest
The Clorox logo
CLX
The Clorox
2.3$178.17-1.0%$22.41 billion$6.72 billion19.84
McCormick & Company, Incorporated logo
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
1.7$82.90-0.3%$22.13 billion$5.35 billion29.29
Kellogg logo
K
Kellogg
2.0$57.70-0.6%$19.85 billion$13.58 billion16.68Unusual Options Activity
Church & Dwight logo
CHD
Church & Dwight
2.3$77.92-0.7%$19.10 billion$4.36 billion25.14
Conagra Brands logo
CAG
Conagra Brands
2.1$34.67-0.3%$16.94 billion$11.05 billion15.27
Campbell Soup logo
CPB
Campbell Soup
1.9$45.80-0.0%$13.87 billion$8.69 billion7.87Upcoming Earnings
Dividend Announcement
The J. M. Smucker logo
SJM
The J. M. Smucker
2.1$116.22-1.9%$12.74 billion$7.80 billion15.05Unusual Options Activity
The Boston Beer logo
SAM
The Boston Beer
1.5$1,030.81-0.8%$12.64 billion$1.25 billion73.63
Lamb Weston logo
LW
Lamb Weston
1.9$82.76-0.4%$12.11 billion$3.79 billion40.97
Darling Ingredients logo
DAR
Darling Ingredients
1.8$67.93-2.6%$11.02 billion$3.36 billion23.03Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Aramark logo
ARMK
Aramark
1.4$40.63-0.0%$10.32 billion$12.83 billion-22.20
Newell Brands logo
NWL
Newell Brands
1.4$23.96-1.7%$10.17 billion$9.71 billion-92.15Decrease in Short Interest
Molson Coors Beverage logo
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage
1.3$45.39-1.0%$9.84 billion$13.01 billion16.87Increase in Short Interest
Coca-Cola FEMSA logo
KOF
Coca-Cola FEMSA
1.8$45.43-2.3%$9.54 billion$10.11 billion21.95Analyst Upgrade
High Trading Volume
Decrease in Short Interest
Beyond Meat logo
BYND
Beyond Meat
1.1$136.42-2.3%$8.59 billion$297.90 million-303.16Analyst Upgrade
The New York Times logo
NYT
The New York Times
1.8$50.46-3.3%$8.44 billion$1.81 billion53.12
Albertsons Companies logo
ACI
Albertsons Companies
2.1$17.93-1.2%$8.35 billion$62.46 billion0.00Analyst Downgrade
US Foods logo
USFD
US Foods
1.5$37.37-2.7%$8.26 billion$25.94 billion-59.32
Service Co. International logo
SCI
Service Co. International
1.9$46.19-1.8%$7.83 billion$3.23 billion18.11
Post logo
POST
Post
1.5$100.88-2.2%$6.49 billion$5.70 billion-3,361.55Insider Selling
Freshpet logo
FRPT
Freshpet
1.7$140.07-5.2%$6.04 billion$245.86 million1,273.48Analyst Report
Coty logo
COTY
Coty
1.3$7.82-4.2%$6.00 billion$4.72 billion-6.74Increase in Short Interest
Ingredion logo
INGR
Ingredion
2.1$89.11-1.7%$5.98 billion$6.21 billion17.61
Pilgrim's Pride logo
PPC
Pilgrim's Pride
1.7$23.75-0.9%$5.78 billion$11.41 billion31.25Analyst Upgrade
Helen of Troy logo
HELE
Helen of Troy
1.5$220.52-1.2%$5.38 billion$1.71 billion24.48Analyst Downgrade
Ollie's Bargain Outlet logo
OLLI
Ollie's Bargain Outlet
1.2$82.16-4.3%$5.37 billion$1.41 billion23.75News Coverage
Lancaster Colony logo
LANC
Lancaster Colony
2.0$175.24-0.6%$4.83 billion$1.33 billion36.21
Flowers Foods logo
FLO
Flowers Foods
1.3$22.40-0.9%$4.74 billion$4.12 billion48.70
National Beverage logo
FIZZ
National Beverage
1.3$48.88-1.0%$4.56 billion$1.00 billion14.21Decrease in Short Interest
51job logo
JOBS
51job
1.7$65.67-2.0%$4.43 billion$574.57 million30.98
WD-40 logo
WDFC
WD-40
1.6$311.95-0.4%$4.27 billion$423.35 million70.90
Nomad Foods logo
NOMD
Nomad Foods
1.8$24.70-2.3%$4.25 billion$2.60 billion20.58
This page was last updated on 3/5/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.