Skip to main content
NYSE:SNP

China Petroleum & Chemical Competitors

$52.90
+0.24 (+0.46 %)
(As of 05/17/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$52.41
$52.94
50-Day Range
$49.19
$54.88
52-Week Range
$38.18
$58.40
Volume87,930 shs
Average Volume150,285 shs
Market Capitalization$64.05 billion
P/E Ratio11.68
Dividend Yield6.27%
Beta0.99

Competitors

China Petroleum & Chemical (NYSE:SNP) Vs. CVX, BP, COP, EQNR, MPC, and PSX

Should you be buying SNP stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "petroleum refining" are considered alternatives and competitors to China Petroleum & Chemical, including Chevron (CVX), BP (BP), ConocoPhillips (COP), Equinor ASA (EQNR), Marathon Petroleum (MPC), and Phillips 66 (PSX).

Chevron (NYSE:CVX) and China Petroleum & Chemical (NYSE:SNP) are both large-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Chevron and China Petroleum & Chemical's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Chevron-10.86%1.75%1.06%
China Petroleum & Chemical1.65%4.11%1.96%

Dividends

Chevron pays an annual dividend of $5.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. China Petroleum & Chemical pays an annual dividend of $3.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Chevron pays out 82.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. China Petroleum & Chemical pays out 51.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chevron has increased its dividend for 34 consecutive years. China Petroleum & Chemical is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Chevron and China Petroleum & Chemical's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chevron$146.52 billion1.46$2.92 billion$6.2717.67
China Petroleum & Chemical$421.14 billion0.15$8.32 billion$6.378.30

China Petroleum & Chemical has higher revenue and earnings than Chevron. China Petroleum & Chemical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chevron, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Chevron has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Petroleum & Chemical has a beta of 0.99, suggesting that its share price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

62.3% of Chevron shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of China Petroleum & Chemical shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Chevron shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 92.2% of China Petroleum & Chemical shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Chevron and China Petroleum & Chemical, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Chevron081702.68
China Petroleum & Chemical10302.50

Chevron currently has a consensus price target of $113.8077, indicating a potential upside of 2.71%. Given Chevron's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Chevron is more favorable than China Petroleum & Chemical.

Summary

China Petroleum & Chemical beats Chevron on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

BP (NYSE:BP) and China Petroleum & Chemical (NYSE:SNP) are both large-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares BP and China Petroleum & Chemical's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
BP-10.45%-3.64%-1.19%
China Petroleum & Chemical1.65%4.11%1.96%

Dividends

BP pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. China Petroleum & Chemical pays an annual dividend of $3.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. BP pays out 42.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical pays out 51.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. BP has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares BP and China Petroleum & Chemical's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BP$282.62 billion0.32$4.03 billion$2.959.18
China Petroleum & Chemical$421.14 billion0.15$8.32 billion$6.378.30

China Petroleum & Chemical has higher revenue and earnings than BP. China Petroleum & Chemical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

BP has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its share price is 13% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Petroleum & Chemical has a beta of 0.99, suggesting that its share price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

7.9% of BP shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of China Petroleum & Chemical shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of BP shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 92.2% of China Petroleum & Chemical shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for BP and China Petroleum & Chemical, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
BP371302.43
China Petroleum & Chemical10302.50

BP currently has a consensus price target of $28.9875, indicating a potential upside of 7.04%. Given BP's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe BP is more favorable than China Petroleum & Chemical.

Summary

China Petroleum & Chemical beats BP on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) and China Petroleum & Chemical (NYSE:SNP) are both large-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and dividends.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

72.9% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of China Petroleum & Chemical shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 92.2% of China Petroleum & Chemical shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for ConocoPhillips and China Petroleum & Chemical, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
ConocoPhillips021712.95
China Petroleum & Chemical10302.50

ConocoPhillips currently has a consensus price target of $60.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.92%. Given ConocoPhillips' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than China Petroleum & Chemical.

Profitability

This table compares ConocoPhillips and China Petroleum & Chemical's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
ConocoPhillips-5.66%-0.02%-0.01%
China Petroleum & Chemical1.65%4.11%1.96%

Volatility & Risk

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.85, suggesting that its share price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Petroleum & Chemical has a beta of 0.99, suggesting that its share price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares ConocoPhillips and China Petroleum & Chemical's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ConocoPhillips$36.67 billion2.15$7.19 billion$3.5916.24
China Petroleum & Chemical$421.14 billion0.15$8.32 billion$6.378.30

China Petroleum & Chemical has higher revenue and earnings than ConocoPhillips. China Petroleum & Chemical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $1.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. China Petroleum & Chemical pays an annual dividend of $3.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. ConocoPhillips pays out 47.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. China Petroleum & Chemical pays out 51.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ConocoPhillips has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

China Petroleum & Chemical (NYSE:SNP) and Equinor ASA (NYSE:EQNR) are both large-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.8% of China Petroleum & Chemical shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of Equinor ASA shares are owned by institutional investors. 92.2% of China Petroleum & Chemical shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for China Petroleum & Chemical and Equinor ASA, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
China Petroleum & Chemical10302.50
Equinor ASA27902.39

Profitability

This table compares China Petroleum & Chemical and Equinor ASA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
China Petroleum & Chemical1.65%4.11%1.96%
Equinor ASA-6.75%7.24%2.36%

Risk and Volatility

China Petroleum & Chemical has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Equinor ASA has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares China Petroleum & Chemical and Equinor ASA's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Petroleum & Chemical$421.14 billion0.15$8.32 billion$6.378.30
Equinor ASA$64.36 billion1.14$1.84 billion$1.4814.85

China Petroleum & Chemical has higher revenue and earnings than Equinor ASA. China Petroleum & Chemical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Equinor ASA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

China Petroleum & Chemical pays an annual dividend of $3.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Equinor ASA pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. China Petroleum & Chemical pays out 51.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Equinor ASA pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Equinor ASA has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

China Petroleum & Chemical (NYSE:SNP) and Marathon Petroleum (NYSE:MPC) are both large-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.8% of China Petroleum & Chemical shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.7% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. 92.2% of China Petroleum & Chemical shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Marathon Petroleum shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for China Petroleum & Chemical and Marathon Petroleum, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
China Petroleum & Chemical10302.50
Marathon Petroleum031112.87

Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $54.0714, indicating a potential downside of 12.11%. Given Marathon Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Marathon Petroleum is more favorable than China Petroleum & Chemical.

Profitability

This table compares China Petroleum & Chemical and Marathon Petroleum's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
China Petroleum & Chemical1.65%4.11%1.96%
Marathon Petroleum-11.11%-1.81%-0.68%

Risk and Volatility

China Petroleum & Chemical has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 2.24, indicating that its stock price is 124% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares China Petroleum & Chemical and Marathon Petroleum's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Petroleum & Chemical$421.14 billion0.15$8.32 billion$6.378.30
Marathon Petroleum$124.88 billion0.32$2.64 billion$4.9412.45

China Petroleum & Chemical has higher revenue and earnings than Marathon Petroleum. China Petroleum & Chemical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marathon Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

China Petroleum & Chemical pays an annual dividend of $3.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Marathon Petroleum pays an annual dividend of $2.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. China Petroleum & Chemical pays out 51.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marathon Petroleum pays out 47.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Marathon Petroleum has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

China Petroleum & Chemical (NYSE:SNP) and Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) are both large-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.8% of China Petroleum & Chemical shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.6% of Phillips 66 shares are owned by institutional investors. 92.2% of China Petroleum & Chemical shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Phillips 66 shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for China Petroleum & Chemical and Phillips 66, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
China Petroleum & Chemical10302.50
Phillips 66041402.78

Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $83.6471, indicating a potential downside of 5.70%. Given Phillips 66's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Phillips 66 is more favorable than China Petroleum & Chemical.

Profitability

This table compares China Petroleum & Chemical and Phillips 66's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
China Petroleum & Chemical1.65%4.11%1.96%
Phillips 66-3.45%3.38%1.47%

Risk and Volatility

China Petroleum & Chemical has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares China Petroleum & Chemical and Phillips 66's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Petroleum & Chemical$421.14 billion0.15$8.32 billion$6.378.30
Phillips 66$109.56 billion0.35$3.08 billion$8.0511.02

China Petroleum & Chemical has higher revenue and earnings than Phillips 66. China Petroleum & Chemical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips 66, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

China Petroleum & Chemical pays an annual dividend of $3.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Phillips 66 pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. China Petroleum & Chemical pays out 51.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 44.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Phillips 66 has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Phillips 66 beats China Petroleum & Chemical on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.


China Petroleum & Chemical Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Chevron logo
CVX
Chevron
2.2$110.81+1.2%$213.65 billion$146.52 billion-18.05Analyst Report
BP logo
BP
BP
1.9$27.08+1.6%$91.54 billion$282.62 billion-4.22Analyst Report
ConocoPhillips logo
COP
ConocoPhillips
1.8$58.30+3.1%$78.67 billion$36.67 billion-51.59Analyst Report
Equinor ASA logo
EQNR
Equinor ASA
1.4$21.98+1.1%$73.38 billion$64.36 billion-21.76Unusual Options Activity
Marathon Petroleum logo
MPC
Marathon Petroleum
2.0$61.52+2.3%$40.15 billion$124.88 billion-4.07Analyst Report
Phillips 66 logo
PSX
Phillips 66
1.7$88.70+1.1%$38.84 billion$109.56 billion-14.38Dividend Announcement
Analyst Report
Suncor Energy logo
SU
Suncor Energy
1.9$24.08+3.5%$36.45 billion$29.54 billion-7.60
Valero Energy logo
VLO
Valero Energy
2.0$81.62+0.5%$33.36 billion$108.32 billion-2,719.76Ex-Dividend
Analyst Report
Hess logo
HES
Hess
1.4$86.42+2.4%$26.65 billion$6.51 billion-8.17Analyst Report
HollyFrontier logo
HFC
HollyFrontier
2.0$36.67+2.3%$5.96 billion$17.49 billion-14.05
Sunoco logo
SUN
Sunoco
1.6$35.36+0.7%$3.53 billion$16.60 billion22.52
CVR Energy logo
CVI
CVR Energy
0.8$23.23+0.8%$2.34 billion$6.36 billion-16.13
PBF Energy logo
PBF
PBF Energy
1.4$15.83+2.8%$1.90 billion$24.51 billion-1.81
YPF Sociedad Anónima logo
YPF
YPF Sociedad Anónima
0.9$4.69+4.7%$1.84 billion$11.45 billion-1.16Earnings Announcement
Delek US logo
DK
Delek US
1.1$22.54+2.0%$1.67 billion$9.30 billion-5.84
Calumet Specialty Products Partners logo
CLMT
Calumet Specialty Products Partners
1.2$5.72+1.7%$450.03 million$3.45 billion-4.37
Trecora Resources logo
TREC
Trecora Resources
1.3$8.07+0.0%$200.74 million$258.96 million18.77
Vertex Energy logo
VTNR
Vertex Energy
1.3$1.99+3.5%$102.97 million$163.37 million-3.62News Coverage
Gap Down
BPT
BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust
0.7$3.53+2.3%$75.54 million$48.97 million2.72
This page was last updated on 5/17/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more about MarketBeat.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.