Constellation Brands Competitors

Constellation Brands (NYSE:STZ.B) and Unilever (NYSE:UL) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Constellation Brands and Unilever, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Unilever has a consensus target price of $45.00, suggesting a potential downside of 20.86%. Given Unilever's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Unilever is more favorable than Constellation Brands.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Constellation Brands and Unilever's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Unilever has higher revenue and earnings than Constellation Brands.

Volatility & Risk

Constellation Brands has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Unilever has a beta of 0.44, suggesting that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.0% of Constellation Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 96.8% of Constellation Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Unilever shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Constellation Brands and Unilever's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Constellation Brands pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Unilever pays an annual dividend of $2.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Unilever pays out 71.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Unilever has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Unilever is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Constellation Brands beats Unilever on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Constellation Brands (NYSE:STZ.B) and Philip Morris International (NYSE:PM) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Constellation Brands and Philip Morris International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.0% of Constellation Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.2% of Philip Morris International shares are held by institutional investors. 96.8% of Constellation Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Philip Morris International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Constellation Brands and Philip Morris International's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Philip Morris International has higher revenue and earnings than Constellation Brands.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Constellation Brands and Philip Morris International, as provided by MarketBeat.

Philip Morris International has a consensus price target of $99.2727, indicating a potential upside of 8.63%. Given Philip Morris International's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Philip Morris International is more favorable than Constellation Brands.

Dividends

Constellation Brands pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Philip Morris International pays an annual dividend of $4.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Philip Morris International pays out 92.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Philip Morris International has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Philip Morris International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Risk and Volatility

Constellation Brands has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.77, indicating that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Philip Morris International beats Constellation Brands on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Constellation Brands (NYSE:STZ.B) and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (NYSE:BUD) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Constellation Brands and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV, as provided by MarketBeat.

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV has a consensus price target of $60.25, indicating a potential downside of 7.41%. Given Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV is more favorable than Constellation Brands.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Constellation Brands and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV has higher revenue and earnings than Constellation Brands.

Profitability

This table compares Constellation Brands and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Constellation Brands has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its share price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV has a beta of 1.48, indicating that its share price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Constellation Brands pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV pays an annual dividend of $0.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV pays out 10.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.0% of Constellation Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.8% of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV shares are held by institutional investors. 96.8% of Constellation Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Constellation Brands beats Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Estée Lauder Companies (NYSE:EL) and Constellation Brands (NYSE:STZ.B) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Dividends

The Estée Lauder Companies pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Constellation Brands pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. The Estée Lauder Companies pays out 51.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Estée Lauder Companies has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Volatility & Risk

The Estée Lauder Companies has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Constellation Brands has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares The Estée Lauder Companies and Constellation Brands' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares The Estée Lauder Companies and Constellation Brands' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

The Estée Lauder Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Constellation Brands.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

55.0% of The Estée Lauder Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Constellation Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.0% of The Estée Lauder Companies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 96.8% of Constellation Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for The Estée Lauder Companies and Constellation Brands, as provided by MarketBeat.

The Estée Lauder Companies currently has a consensus price target of $281.0952, suggesting a potential downside of 7.30%. Given The Estée Lauder Companies' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe The Estée Lauder Companies is more favorable than Constellation Brands.

Summary

The Estée Lauder Companies beats Constellation Brands on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Constellation Brands (NYSE:STZ.B) and Diageo (NYSE:DEO) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Constellation Brands has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its share price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Diageo has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its share price is 34% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.0% of Constellation Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Diageo shares are owned by institutional investors. 96.8% of Constellation Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Constellation Brands and Diageo's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Diageo has higher revenue and earnings than Constellation Brands.

Profitability

This table compares Constellation Brands and Diageo's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Constellation Brands pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Diageo pays an annual dividend of $3.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Diageo pays out 55.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Constellation Brands and Diageo, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Diageo has a consensus target price of $143.50, indicating a potential downside of 17.33%. Given Diageo's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Diageo is more favorable than Constellation Brands.

Summary

Diageo beats Constellation Brands on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Altria Group (NYSE:MO) and Constellation Brands (NYSE:STZ.B) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Altria Group and Constellation Brands' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Altria Group pays an annual dividend of $3.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Constellation Brands pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Altria Group pays out 81.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Altria Group has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Altria Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Risk and Volatility

Altria Group has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Constellation Brands has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

62.2% of Altria Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Constellation Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Altria Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 96.8% of Constellation Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Altria Group and Constellation Brands' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Constellation Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Altria Group.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Altria Group and Constellation Brands, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Altria Group currently has a consensus price target of $49.90, suggesting a potential downside of 3.57%. Given Altria Group's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Altria Group is more favorable than Constellation Brands.

Summary

Altria Group beats Constellation Brands on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.