CynergisTek Competitors

CynergisTek (NYSEAMERICAN:CTEK) and Logiq (OTCMKTS:LGIQ) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Risk & Volatility

CynergisTek has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Logiq has a beta of 2.49, suggesting that its stock price is 149% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares CynergisTek and Logiq's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

CynergisTek has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Logiq.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for CynergisTek and Logiq, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

20.9% of CynergisTek shares are held by institutional investors. 15.0% of CynergisTek shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.5% of Logiq shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares CynergisTek and Logiq's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

CynergisTek beats Logiq on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Iota Communications (OTCMKTS:IOTC) and CynergisTek (NYSEAMERICAN:CTEK) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

20.9% of CynergisTek shares are held by institutional investors. 6.2% of Iota Communications shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of CynergisTek shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Iota Communications has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CynergisTek has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Iota Communications and CynergisTek's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Iota Communications and CynergisTek's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

CynergisTek has higher revenue and earnings than Iota Communications.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Iota Communications and CynergisTek, as reported by MarketBeat.

Summary

CynergisTek beats Iota Communications on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

CynergisTek (NYSEAMERICAN:CTEK) and TuanChe (NASDAQ:TC) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

Volatility and Risk

CynergisTek has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TuanChe has a beta of 0.14, meaning that its share price is 86% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares CynergisTek and TuanChe's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for CynergisTek and TuanChe, as provided by MarketBeat.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

20.9% of CynergisTek shares are held by institutional investors. 15.0% of CynergisTek shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TuanChe shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares CynergisTek and TuanChe's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

CynergisTek has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TuanChe.

Summary

CynergisTek beats TuanChe on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Logiq (OTCMKTS:WEYL) and CynergisTek (NYSEAMERICAN:CTEK) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Logiq and CynergisTek, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Volatility and Risk

Logiq has a beta of 1.43, indicating that its share price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CynergisTek has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Logiq and CynergisTek's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

20.9% of CynergisTek shares are held by institutional investors. 9.5% of Logiq shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of CynergisTek shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Logiq and CynergisTek's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

CynergisTek has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Logiq.

Summary

CynergisTek beats Logiq on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

CynergisTek (NYSEAMERICAN:CTEK) and OmniComm Systems (OTCMKTS:OMCM) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares CynergisTek and OmniComm Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

20.9% of CynergisTek shares are held by institutional investors. 15.0% of CynergisTek shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 48.9% of OmniComm Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for CynergisTek and OmniComm Systems, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares CynergisTek and OmniComm Systems' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

CynergisTek has higher earnings, but lower revenue than OmniComm Systems.

Volatility & Risk

CynergisTek has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, OmniComm Systems has a beta of 0.67, meaning that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

OmniComm Systems beats CynergisTek on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

CynergisTek (NYSEAMERICAN:CTEK) and Generation Hemp (OTCMKTS:GENH) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for CynergisTek and Generation Hemp, as provided by MarketBeat.

Volatility & Risk

CynergisTek has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Generation Hemp has a beta of -1.41, indicating that its share price is 241% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

20.9% of CynergisTek shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.0% of CynergisTek shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares CynergisTek and Generation Hemp's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares CynergisTek and Generation Hemp's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

CynergisTek has higher revenue and earnings than Generation Hemp.

Summary

CynergisTek beats Generation Hemp on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.