Goodrich Petroleum Competitors

Advantage Oil & Gas (OTCMKTS:AAVVF) and Goodrich Petroleum (NYSEAMERICAN:GDP) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Advantage Oil & Gas and Goodrich Petroleum, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Advantage Oil & Gas presently has a consensus price target of $4.0625, suggesting a potential upside of 44.55%. Goodrich Petroleum has a consensus price target of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.93%. Given Advantage Oil & Gas' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Advantage Oil & Gas is more favorable than Goodrich Petroleum.

Risk and Volatility

Advantage Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.83, meaning that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Goodrich Petroleum has a beta of 2.11, meaning that its stock price is 111% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Advantage Oil & Gas and Goodrich Petroleum's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Goodrich Petroleum has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Advantage Oil & Gas.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

3.2% of Advantage Oil & Gas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Goodrich Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Goodrich Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Advantage Oil & Gas and Goodrich Petroleum's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Advantage Oil & Gas beats Goodrich Petroleum on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Goodrich Petroleum (NYSEAMERICAN:GDP) and Dorchester Minerals (NASDAQ:DMLP) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

Goodrich Petroleum has a beta of 2.11, suggesting that its share price is 111% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dorchester Minerals has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

80.4% of Goodrich Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.3% of Dorchester Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Goodrich Petroleum shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.8% of Dorchester Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Goodrich Petroleum and Dorchester Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Goodrich Petroleum and Dorchester Minerals' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Dorchester Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Goodrich Petroleum.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Goodrich Petroleum and Dorchester Minerals, as reported by MarketBeat.

Goodrich Petroleum currently has a consensus target price of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.93%. Given Goodrich Petroleum's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Goodrich Petroleum is more favorable than Dorchester Minerals.

Goodrich Petroleum (NYSEAMERICAN:GDP) and Laredo Petroleum (NYSE:LPI) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

Goodrich Petroleum has a beta of 2.11, suggesting that its share price is 111% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Laredo Petroleum has a beta of 4.72, suggesting that its share price is 372% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

80.4% of Goodrich Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.7% of Laredo Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Goodrich Petroleum shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Laredo Petroleum shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Goodrich Petroleum and Laredo Petroleum's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Goodrich Petroleum and Laredo Petroleum's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Goodrich Petroleum has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Laredo Petroleum. Laredo Petroleum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goodrich Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Goodrich Petroleum and Laredo Petroleum, as reported by MarketBeat.

Goodrich Petroleum currently has a consensus target price of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.93%. Laredo Petroleum has a consensus target price of $26.25, suggesting a potential downside of 33.27%. Given Goodrich Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Goodrich Petroleum is more favorable than Laredo Petroleum.

Goodrich Petroleum (NYSEAMERICAN:GDP) and W&T Offshore (NYSE:WTI) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

Goodrich Petroleum has a beta of 2.11, suggesting that its share price is 111% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, W&T Offshore has a beta of 3.16, suggesting that its share price is 216% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

80.4% of Goodrich Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.6% of W&T Offshore shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Goodrich Petroleum shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 34.1% of W&T Offshore shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Goodrich Petroleum and W&T Offshore's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Goodrich Petroleum and W&T Offshore's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

W&T Offshore has higher revenue and earnings than Goodrich Petroleum. W&T Offshore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goodrich Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Goodrich Petroleum and W&T Offshore, as reported by MarketBeat.

Goodrich Petroleum currently has a consensus target price of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.93%. Given Goodrich Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Goodrich Petroleum is more favorable than W&T Offshore.

Goodrich Petroleum (NYSEAMERICAN:GDP) and Berry (NASDAQ:BRY) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

Goodrich Petroleum has a beta of 2.11, suggesting that its share price is 111% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Berry has a beta of 2.94, suggesting that its share price is 194% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

80.4% of Goodrich Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.5% of Berry shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Goodrich Petroleum shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Berry shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Goodrich Petroleum and Berry's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Goodrich Petroleum and Berry's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Berry has higher revenue and earnings than Goodrich Petroleum. Berry is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goodrich Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Goodrich Petroleum and Berry, as reported by MarketBeat.

Goodrich Petroleum currently has a consensus target price of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.93%. Berry has a consensus target price of $6.1250, suggesting a potential upside of 0.57%. Given Goodrich Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Goodrich Petroleum is more favorable than Berry.

Summary

Berry beats Goodrich Petroleum on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Goodrich Petroleum (NYSEAMERICAN:GDP) and Falcon Minerals (NASDAQ:FLMN) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

Goodrich Petroleum has a beta of 2.11, suggesting that its share price is 111% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Falcon Minerals has a beta of 1.78, suggesting that its share price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

80.4% of Goodrich Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Goodrich Petroleum shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Goodrich Petroleum and Falcon Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Goodrich Petroleum and Falcon Minerals' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Falcon Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Goodrich Petroleum. Goodrich Petroleum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Falcon Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Goodrich Petroleum and Falcon Minerals, as reported by MarketBeat.

Goodrich Petroleum currently has a consensus target price of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.93%. Falcon Minerals has a consensus target price of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.21%. Given Goodrich Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Goodrich Petroleum is more favorable than Falcon Minerals.

Summary

Falcon Minerals beats Goodrich Petroleum on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.