OTCMKTS:APVS

Applied Visual Sciences Competitors

$0.0047
0.00 (0.00 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$0.00
Now: $0.00
$0.01
50-Day Range
$0.00
MA: $0.01
$0.01
52-Week Range
$0.00
Now: $0.00
$0.01
Volume72,274 shs
Average Volume346,643 shs
Market CapitalizationN/A
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta0.16

Competitors

Applied Visual Sciences (OTCMKTS:APVS) Vs. HPE, KGDEY, SNX, PLUS, SCSC, and WSTG

Should you be buying APVS stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "computers, peripherals, & software" are considered alternatives and competitors to Applied Visual Sciences, including Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), Kingdee International Software Group (KGDEY), SYNNEX (SNX), ePlus (PLUS), ScanSource (SCSC), and Wayside Technology Group (WSTG).

Applied Visual Sciences (OTCMKTS:APVS) and Hewlett Packard Enterprise (NYSE:HPE) are both aerospace companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

81.3% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise shares are owned by institutional investors. 33.0% of Applied Visual Sciences shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Applied Visual Sciences and Hewlett Packard Enterprise's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Applied Visual SciencesN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Hewlett Packard Enterprise$26.98 billion0.77$-322,000,000.00$1.3511.81

Applied Visual Sciences has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hewlett Packard Enterprise.

Risk and Volatility

Applied Visual Sciences has a beta of 0.16, meaning that its share price is 84% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hewlett Packard Enterprise has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its share price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Applied Visual Sciences and Hewlett Packard Enterprise's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Applied Visual SciencesN/AN/AN/A
Hewlett Packard Enterprise-1.19%10.73%3.22%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Applied Visual Sciences and Hewlett Packard Enterprise, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Applied Visual Sciences0000N/A
Hewlett Packard Enterprise27502.21

Hewlett Packard Enterprise has a consensus target price of $12.8333, suggesting a potential downside of 19.54%. Given Hewlett Packard Enterprise's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hewlett Packard Enterprise is more favorable than Applied Visual Sciences.

Summary

Hewlett Packard Enterprise beats Applied Visual Sciences on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Applied Visual Sciences (OTCMKTS:APVS) and Kingdee International Software Group (OTCMKTS:KGDEY) are both aerospace companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.0% of Kingdee International Software Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 33.0% of Applied Visual Sciences shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Applied Visual Sciences and Kingdee International Software Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Applied Visual SciencesN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Kingdee International Software Group$472.17 million23.08$53.91 million$1.59197.56

Kingdee International Software Group has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Visual Sciences.

Risk and Volatility

Applied Visual Sciences has a beta of 0.16, meaning that its share price is 84% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kingdee International Software Group has a beta of 0.33, meaning that its share price is 67% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Applied Visual Sciences and Kingdee International Software Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Applied Visual SciencesN/AN/AN/A
Kingdee International Software GroupN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Applied Visual Sciences and Kingdee International Software Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Applied Visual Sciences0000N/A
Kingdee International Software Group12001.67

Summary

Kingdee International Software Group beats Applied Visual Sciences on 3 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

SYNNEX (NYSE:SNX) and Applied Visual Sciences (OTCMKTS:APVS) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

75.9% of SYNNEX shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of SYNNEX shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 33.0% of Applied Visual Sciences shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

SYNNEX has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its share price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Applied Visual Sciences has a beta of 0.16, suggesting that its share price is 84% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares SYNNEX and Applied Visual Sciences' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
SYNNEX2.14%17.47%5.51%
Applied Visual SciencesN/AN/AN/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares SYNNEX and Applied Visual Sciences' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SYNNEX$24.68 billion0.26$500.71 million$13.689.06
Applied Visual SciencesN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

SYNNEX has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Visual Sciences.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for SYNNEX and Applied Visual Sciences, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
SYNNEX02502.71
Applied Visual Sciences0000N/A

SYNNEX presently has a consensus price target of $123.1250, suggesting a potential downside of 0.67%. Given SYNNEX's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe SYNNEX is more favorable than Applied Visual Sciences.

Summary

SYNNEX beats Applied Visual Sciences on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

ePlus (NASDAQ:PLUS) and Applied Visual Sciences (OTCMKTS:APVS) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for ePlus and Applied Visual Sciences, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
ePlus01002.00
Applied Visual Sciences0000N/A

Volatility & Risk

ePlus has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Applied Visual Sciences has a beta of 0.16, suggesting that its share price is 84% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

92.7% of ePlus shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of ePlus shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 33.0% of Applied Visual Sciences shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares ePlus and Applied Visual Sciences' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
ePlus4.42%14.11%7.07%
Applied Visual SciencesN/AN/AN/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares ePlus and Applied Visual Sciences' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ePlus$1.59 billion0.84$69.08 million$5.1519.28
Applied Visual SciencesN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

ePlus has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Visual Sciences.

Summary

ePlus beats Applied Visual Sciences on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Applied Visual Sciences (OTCMKTS:APVS) and ScanSource (NASDAQ:SCSC) are both aerospace companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Applied Visual Sciences and ScanSource, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Applied Visual Sciences0000N/A
ScanSource00103.00

ScanSource has a consensus price target of $31.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.74%. Given ScanSource's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ScanSource is more favorable than Applied Visual Sciences.

Risk and Volatility

Applied Visual Sciences has a beta of 0.16, indicating that its stock price is 84% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ScanSource has a beta of 1.51, indicating that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

93.4% of ScanSource shares are held by institutional investors. 33.0% of Applied Visual Sciences shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of ScanSource shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Applied Visual Sciences and ScanSource's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Applied Visual SciencesN/AN/AN/A
ScanSource-6.63%5.58%2.30%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Applied Visual Sciences and ScanSource's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Applied Visual SciencesN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
ScanSource$3.05 billion0.25$-192,650,000.00$2.0514.86

Applied Visual Sciences has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ScanSource.

Summary

ScanSource beats Applied Visual Sciences on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Wayside Technology Group (NASDAQ:WSTG) and Applied Visual Sciences (OTCMKTS:APVS) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Volatility & Risk

Wayside Technology Group has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Applied Visual Sciences has a beta of 0.16, meaning that its share price is 84% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Wayside Technology Group and Applied Visual Sciences' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wayside Technology Group$208.76 million0.54$6.79 millionN/AN/A
Applied Visual SciencesN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Wayside Technology Group has higher revenue and earnings than Applied Visual Sciences.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

38.2% of Wayside Technology Group shares are held by institutional investors. 6.1% of Wayside Technology Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 33.0% of Applied Visual Sciences shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Wayside Technology Group and Applied Visual Sciences, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Wayside Technology Group0000N/A
Applied Visual Sciences0000N/A

Profitability

This table compares Wayside Technology Group and Applied Visual Sciences' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Wayside Technology Group2.10%15.39%5.42%
Applied Visual SciencesN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Wayside Technology Group beats Applied Visual Sciences on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.


Applied Visual Sciences Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Hewlett Packard Enterprise logo
HPE
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
2.1$15.95flat$20.75 billion$26.98 billion-61.35Analyst Report
Unusual Options Activity
Kingdee International Software Group logo
KGDEY
Kingdee International Software Group
0.5$314.12flat$10.90 billion$472.17 million197.56
SYNNEX logo
SNX
SYNNEX
1.9$123.96flat$6.43 billion$24.68 billion12.15Insider Selling
Increase in Short Interest
ePlus logo
PLUS
ePlus
1.3$99.27flat$1.34 billion$1.59 billion18.98Decrease in Short Interest
ScanSource logo
SCSC
ScanSource
1.4$30.47flat$775.52 million$3.05 billion-3.58News Coverage
Gap Up
Wayside Technology Group logo
WSTG
Wayside Technology Group
1.3$25.35flat$111.79 million$208.76 million23.47Increase in Short Interest
Gap Up
Smart Card Marketing Systems logo
SMKG
Smart Card Marketing Systems
0.2$0.07flat$25.75 millionN/A0.00Gap Down
Speed Commerce logo
SPDC
Speed Commerce
0.5$0.05flat$232,000.00N/A0.00
MTRO
Metro One Development
0.0$0.00flat$160,000.00N/A0.00
Cistera Networks logo
CNWT
Cistera Networks
0.0$0.01flat$0.00N/A0.00
INOW
InfoNow
0.0$0.02flat$0.00N/A0.00
This page was last updated on 4/18/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.