OTCMKTS:ARKAY

Arkema Competitors

$122.88
0.00 (0.00 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$122.88
Now: $122.88
$122.88
50-Day Range
$110.00
MA: $120.17
$124.90
52-Week Range
$74.25
Now: $122.88
$125.74
Volume733 shs
Average Volume1,835 shs
Market Capitalization$9.43 billion
P/E Ratio25.13
Dividend Yield1.63%
Beta1.57

Competitors

Arkema (OTCMKTS:ARKAY) Vs. SCHYY, KHNGY, SDVKY, HNNMY, JAPAY, and EXPGY

Should you be buying ARKAY stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "private households" are considered alternatives and competitors to Arkema, including Sands China (SCHYY), Kuehne + Nagel International (KHNGY), Sandvik AB (publ) (SDVKY), H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) (HNNMY), Japan Tobacco (JAPAY), and Experian (EXPGY).

Sands China (OTCMKTS:SCHYY) and Arkema (OTCMKTS:ARKAY) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.0% of Sands China shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Arkema shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Sands China has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its share price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Arkema has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its share price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Sands China and Arkema, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sands China01102.50
Arkema26502.23

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Sands China and Arkema's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sands China$8.81 billion4.28$2.03 billion$2.5118.57
Arkema$9.79 billion0.96$608.16 million$9.1913.37

Sands China has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Arkema. Arkema is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sands China, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Sands China and Arkema's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sands ChinaN/AN/AN/A
Arkema4.58%7.32%3.66%

Summary

Arkema beats Sands China on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kuehne + Nagel International (OTCMKTS:KHNGY) and Arkema (OTCMKTS:ARKAY) are both transportation companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings and risk.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.3% of Arkema shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Kuehne + Nagel International has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its share price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Arkema has a beta of 1.57, indicating that its share price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Kuehne + Nagel International pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Arkema pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Kuehne + Nagel International pays out 38.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Arkema pays out 22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Arkema is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Kuehne + Nagel International and Arkema, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kuehne + Nagel International65001.45
Arkema26502.23

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Kuehne + Nagel International and Arkema's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kuehne + Nagel International$21.23 billion1.74$803.19 million$1.3446.03
Arkema$9.79 billion0.96$608.16 million$9.1913.37

Kuehne + Nagel International has higher revenue and earnings than Arkema. Arkema is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kuehne + Nagel International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Kuehne + Nagel International and Arkema's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kuehne + Nagel International3.88%34.26%8.27%
Arkema4.58%7.32%3.66%

Summary

Arkema beats Kuehne + Nagel International on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sandvik AB (publ) (OTCMKTS:SDVKY) and Arkema (OTCMKTS:ARKAY) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Sandvik AB (publ) and Arkema's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sandvik AB (publ)$10.92 billion3.33$903.43 million$1.1824.61
Arkema$9.79 billion0.96$608.16 million$9.1913.37

Sandvik AB (publ) has higher revenue and earnings than Arkema. Arkema is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sandvik AB (publ), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Sandvik AB (publ) has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its share price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Arkema has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its share price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Sandvik AB (publ) and Arkema, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sandvik AB (publ)231102.56
Arkema26502.23

Profitability

This table compares Sandvik AB (publ) and Arkema's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sandvik AB (publ)6.75%19.81%10.54%
Arkema4.58%7.32%3.66%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.1% of Sandvik AB (publ) shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Arkema shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Sandvik AB (publ) beats Arkema on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Arkema (OTCMKTS:ARKAY) and H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) (OTCMKTS:HNNMY) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Dividends

Arkema pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Arkema pays out 22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) pays out 41.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Arkema is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Arkema and H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)'s top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Arkema$9.79 billion0.96$608.16 million$9.1913.37
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)$24.63 billion1.42$1.43 billion$0.1728.18

H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) has higher revenue and earnings than Arkema. Arkema is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Arkema has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Arkema and H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ), as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Arkema26502.23
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)36502.14

Profitability

This table compares Arkema and H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Arkema4.58%7.32%3.66%
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)1.62%5.72%1.87%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.3% of Arkema shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Arkema beats H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Arkema (OTCMKTS:ARKAY) and Japan Tobacco (OTCMKTS:JAPAY) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Dividends

Arkema pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Japan Tobacco pays an annual dividend of $0.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Arkema pays out 22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Japan Tobacco pays out 56.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Arkema and Japan Tobacco's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Arkema$9.79 billion0.96$608.16 million$9.1913.37
Japan Tobacco$19.96 billion1.70$3.20 billion$0.9010.62

Japan Tobacco has higher revenue and earnings than Arkema. Japan Tobacco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arkema, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Arkema has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Japan Tobacco has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Arkema and Japan Tobacco, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Arkema26502.23
Japan Tobacco01002.00

Profitability

This table compares Arkema and Japan Tobacco's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Arkema4.58%7.32%3.66%
Japan Tobacco13.61%11.20%5.45%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.3% of Arkema shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Japan Tobacco shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Arkema (OTCMKTS:ARKAY) and Experian (OTCMKTS:EXPGY) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Risk and Volatility

Arkema has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Experian has a beta of 0.64, suggesting that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Arkema and Experian's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Arkema$9.79 billion0.96$608.16 million$9.1913.37
Experian$5.18 billion6.53$675 million$1.0236.15

Experian has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Arkema. Arkema is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Experian, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Arkema and Experian's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Arkema4.58%7.32%3.66%
ExperianN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Arkema and Experian, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Arkema26502.23
Experian02902.82

Dividends

Arkema pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Experian pays an annual dividend of $0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Arkema pays out 22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Experian pays out 25.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Arkema is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.3% of Arkema shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Experian shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Arkema beats Experian on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Arkema Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Sands China logo
SCHYY
Sands China
0.9$46.61flat$37.71 billion$8.81 billion18.57Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
Kuehne + Nagel International logo
KHNGY
Kuehne + Nagel International
0.9$61.68flat$36.92 billion$21.23 billion45.69Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
Sandvik AB (publ) logo
SDVKY
Sandvik AB (publ)
0.8$29.04flat$36.43 billion$10.92 billion54.79Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) logo
HNNMY
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)
0.7$4.79flat$34.98 billion$24.63 billion159.67
Japan Tobacco logo
JAPAY
Japan Tobacco
1.2$9.56flat$33.91 billion$19.96 billion12.58
Experian logo
EXPGY
Experian
1.1$36.87flat$33.82 billion$5.18 billion36.15Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
Techtronic Industries logo
TTNDY
Techtronic Industries
0.2$88.81flat$32.55 billion$7.67 billion0.00
Amadeus IT Group logo
AMADY
Amadeus IT Group
0.5$70.16flat$31.61 billion$6.25 billion-241.92
CK Hutchison logo
CKHUY
CK Hutchison
0.7$8.19flat$31.58 billion$38.34 billion0.00Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
ASSA ABLOY AB (publ) logo
ASAZY
ASSA ABLOY AB (publ)
1.2$14.92flat$31.48 billion$9.95 billion36.39Decrease in Short Interest
Swire Pacific logo
SWRAY
Swire Pacific
1.6$7.96flat$30.94 billion$10.93 billion3.17Decrease in Short Interest
Fujitsu logo
FJTSY
Fujitsu
0.9$29.93flat$30.33 billion$35.49 billion22.67Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
Ashtead Group logo
ASHTY
Ashtead Group
1.2$260.87flat$29.30 billion$5.84 billion36.03Analyst Report
News Coverage
Zalando logo
ZLNDY
Zalando
0.4$53.06flat$27.69 billion$7.26 billion241.19Analyst Downgrade
Sampo Oyj logo
SAXPY
Sampo Oyj
0.8$24.01flat$26.90 billion$12.62 billion18.76
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions logo
MGDDY
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions
1.5$29.94flat$26.70 billion$27.03 billion13.80
Associated British Foods logo
ASBFY
Associated British Foods
0.9$33.52flat$26.54 billion$18.00 billion31.92Decrease in Short Interest
China CITIC Bank logo
CHCJY
China CITIC Bank
0.9$10.79flat$26.40 billion$47.62 billion0.00Upcoming Earnings
Wilmar International logo
WLMIY
Wilmar International
0.7$41.31flat$26.10 billion$42.64 billion20.25Increase in Short Interest
Sunny Optical Technology (Group) logo
SNPTF
Sunny Optical Technology (Group)
0.5$23.18flat$25.42 billion$5.48 billion0.00Analyst Revision
Unicharm logo
UNICY
Unicharm
0.9$8.20flat$24.35 billion$6.55 billion63.08
Kerry Group logo
KRYAY
Kerry Group
1.2$134.64flat$23.79 billion$8.11 billion30.53Analyst Upgrade
BAE Systems logo
BAESY
BAE Systems
1.4$29.00flat$23.36 billion$22.52 billion14.22Analyst Report
News Coverage
UniCredit logo
UNCFF
UniCredit
1.2$10.33flat$23.14 billion$25.52 billion10.76News Coverage
Gap Down
Shimano logo
SMNNY
Shimano
0.5$24.91flat$23.09 billion$3.33 billion41.84Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
China Mengniu Dairy logo
CIADY
China Mengniu Dairy
0.9$57.75flat$22.80 billion$11.44 billion37.99Analyst Upgrade
Ocado Group logo
OCDDY
Ocado Group
0.4$61.25flat$22.63 billion$2.26 billion-80.59High Trading Volume
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
SGS logo
SGSOY
SGS
1.3$29.47flat$22.30 billion$6.64 billion33.11Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Sysmex logo
SSMXY
Sysmex
0.6$52.20flat$21.87 billion$2.78 billion79.09
Suzuki Motor logo
SZKMY
Suzuki Motor
1.5$172.91flat$21.23 billion$32.03 billion20.51Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
Nomura Research Institute logo
NRILY
Nomura Research Institute
1.1$31.34flat$20.08 billion$4.87 billion36.87Decrease in Short Interest
Rakuten logo
RKUNY
Rakuten
0.6$12.69flat$19.99 billion$11.60 billion-20.80Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
Eisai logo
ESALY
Eisai
1.3$66.86flat$19.83 billion$6.40 billion17.28Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
Secom logo
SOMLY
Secom
1.3$21.20flat$19.78 billion$9.75 billion25.85News Coverage
Ferrovial logo
FRRVY
Ferrovial
0.5$26.46flat$19.39 billion$6.78 billion0.00Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Eurofins Scientific logo
ERFSF
Eurofins Scientific
0.9$107.50flat$19.14 billion$5.19 billion47.57News Coverage
Sino Biopharmaceutical logo
SBMFF
Sino Biopharmaceutical
0.8$1.00flat$18.88 billion$3.51 billion0.00
Deutsche Wohnen logo
DWHHF
Deutsche Wohnen
0.9$51.84flat$17.37 billion$937.88 million15.16Gap Down
OMRON logo
OMRNY
OMRON
1.0$82.95flat$17.11 billion$6.24 billion0.00Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
OMV Aktiengesellschaft logo
OMVJF
OMV Aktiengesellschaft
1.0$51.22flat$16.72 billion$26.28 billion-51.74Analyst Revision
NN Group logo
NNGRY
NN Group
1.1$25.08flat$16.57 billion$22.92 billion7.79
Surgutneftegas Public Joint Stock logo
SGTZY
Surgutneftegas Public Joint Stock
0.1$4.60flat$16.43 billion$28.13 billion0.00
Atlantia logo
ATASY
Atlantia
0.6$9.77flat$16.14 billion$14.13 billion108.56Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group logo
CJEWY
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group
1.2$16.10flat$16.10 billion$7.26 billion43.51Analyst Revision
bioMérieux logo
BMXMF
bioMérieux
0.5$134.50flat$15.92 billion$3.00 billion52.13
COSCO SHIPPING logo
CICOY
COSCO SHIPPING
0.8$7.68flat$15.69 billion$21.78 billion96.00News Coverage
Gap Down
Carrefour logo
CRRFY
Carrefour
1.1$3.68flat$15.04 billion$81.09 billion14.15Increase in Short Interest
Terna - Rete Elettrica Nazionale Società per Azioni logo
TEZNY
Terna - Rete Elettrica Nazionale Società per Azioni
0.6$21.96flat$14.71 billionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Persimmon logo
PSMMY
Persimmon
1.3$90.35flat$14.41 billion$4.66 billion13.15
Schroders logo
SHNWF
Schroders
0.9$50.52flat$14.27 billion$3.24 billion19.97Gap Down
This page was last updated on 4/16/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.