Arkema Competitors

Sands China (OTCMKTS:SCHYY) and Arkema (OTCMKTS:ARKAY) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.0% of Sands China shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Arkema shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Sands China has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its share price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Arkema has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its share price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Sands China and Arkema, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Sands China and Arkema's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Sands China has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Arkema. Arkema is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sands China, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Sands China and Arkema's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Arkema beats Sands China on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kuehne + Nagel International (OTCMKTS:KHNGY) and Arkema (OTCMKTS:ARKAY) are both transportation companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings and risk.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.3% of Arkema shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Kuehne + Nagel International has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its share price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Arkema has a beta of 1.57, indicating that its share price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Kuehne + Nagel International pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Arkema pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Kuehne + Nagel International pays out 38.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Arkema pays out 22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Arkema is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Kuehne + Nagel International and Arkema, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Kuehne + Nagel International and Arkema's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Kuehne + Nagel International has higher revenue and earnings than Arkema. Arkema is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kuehne + Nagel International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Kuehne + Nagel International and Arkema's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Arkema beats Kuehne + Nagel International on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sandvik AB (publ) (OTCMKTS:SDVKY) and Arkema (OTCMKTS:ARKAY) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Sandvik AB (publ) and Arkema's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Sandvik AB (publ) has higher revenue and earnings than Arkema. Arkema is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sandvik AB (publ), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Sandvik AB (publ) has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its share price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Arkema has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its share price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Sandvik AB (publ) and Arkema, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Profitability

This table compares Sandvik AB (publ) and Arkema's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.1% of Sandvik AB (publ) shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Arkema shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Sandvik AB (publ) beats Arkema on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Arkema (OTCMKTS:ARKAY) and H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) (OTCMKTS:HNNMY) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Dividends

Arkema pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Arkema pays out 22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) pays out 41.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Arkema is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Arkema and H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)'s top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) has higher revenue and earnings than Arkema. Arkema is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Arkema has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Arkema and H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ), as reported by MarketBeat.

Profitability

This table compares Arkema and H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.3% of Arkema shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Arkema beats H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Arkema (OTCMKTS:ARKAY) and Japan Tobacco (OTCMKTS:JAPAY) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Dividends

Arkema pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Japan Tobacco pays an annual dividend of $0.51 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Arkema pays out 22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Japan Tobacco pays out 56.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Arkema and Japan Tobacco's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Japan Tobacco has higher revenue and earnings than Arkema. Japan Tobacco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arkema, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Arkema has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Japan Tobacco has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Arkema and Japan Tobacco, as reported by MarketBeat.

Profitability

This table compares Arkema and Japan Tobacco's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.3% of Arkema shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Japan Tobacco shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Arkema (OTCMKTS:ARKAY) and Experian (OTCMKTS:EXPGY) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Risk and Volatility

Arkema has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Experian has a beta of 0.64, suggesting that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Arkema and Experian's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Experian has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Arkema. Arkema is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Experian, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Arkema and Experian's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Arkema and Experian, as reported by MarketBeat.

Dividends

Arkema pays an annual dividend of $2.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Experian pays an annual dividend of $0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Arkema pays out 22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Experian pays out 25.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Arkema is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.3% of Arkema shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Experian shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Arkema beats Experian on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.